These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9823125)

  • 1. Comparison of two endodontic handpieces during the preparation of root canals in extracted human teeth.
    Smith RB; Edmunds DH
    Int Endod J; 1998 Jan; 31(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 9823125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of two endodontic handpieces during the preparation of simulated root canals.
    Smith RB; Edmunds DH
    Int Endod J; 1997 Nov; 30(6):369-80. PubMed ID: 9588976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An in vitro comparison of the Excalibur handpiece and hand instrumentation in curved root canals.
    Cheung GS; Chan AW
    J Endod; 1996 Mar; 22(3):131-4. PubMed ID: 8618094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of different types of automated devices on the shaping ability of rotary nickel-titanium FlexMaster instruments.
    Schäfer E; Erler M; Dammaschke T
    Int Endod J; 2005 Sep; 38(9):627-36. PubMed ID: 16104976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Shaping ability of two rotary instruments in simulated canals: stainless steel ENDOflash and nickel-titanium HERO Shaper.
    Perez F; Schoumacher M; Peli JF
    Int Endod J; 2005 Sep; 38(9):637-44. PubMed ID: 16104977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
    Schäfer E; Vlassis M
    Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):239-48. PubMed ID: 15056350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analysis of mechanical preparations in extracted teeth using ProTaper rotary instruments: value of the safety quotient.
    Blum JY; Machtou P; Ruddle C; Micallef JP
    J Endod; 2003 Sep; 29(9):567-75. PubMed ID: 14503829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [In vitro comparison of root canal preparation with step-back technique and GT rotary file--a nickel-titanium engine driven rotary instrument system].
    Krajczár K; Tóth V; Nyárády Z; Szabó G
    Fogorv Sz; 2005 Jun; 98(3):119-23. PubMed ID: 16108416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of the performance of four files with rounded tips during shaping of simulated root canals.
    Dummer PM; al-Omari MA; Bryant S
    J Endod; 1998 May; 24(5):364-71. PubMed ID: 9641115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Root canal cleanliness after preparation with different endodontic handpieces and hand instruments: a comparative SEM investigation.
    Hülsmann M; Rümmelin C; Schäfers F
    J Endod; 1997 May; 23(5):301-6. PubMed ID: 9545932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Comparative study of hand-held nickel-titanium dental instruments based on the shape of the prepared root canal].
    Szabó J; Serbán T; Nagy G; Madléna M; Ipolyi T
    Fogorv Sz; 2003 Dec; 96(6):273-6. PubMed ID: 14971265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of two sonic handpieces during the preparation of simulated root canals.
    Dummer PM; Hutchings R; Hartles FR
    Int Endod J; 1993 May; 26(3):159-68. PubMed ID: 8406963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of nickel-titanium file distortion using electric and air-driven handpieces.
    Bortnick KL; Steiman HR; Ruskin A
    J Endod; 2001 Jan; 27(1):57-9. PubMed ID: 11487167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparative study of Endoflare-Hero Shaper and Mtwo NiTi instruments in the preparation of curved root canals.
    Veltri M; Mollo A; Mantovani L; Pini P; Balleri P; Grandini S
    Int Endod J; 2005 Sep; 38(9):610-6. PubMed ID: 16104974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The influence of various automated devices on the shaping ability of Mtwo rotary nickel-titanium instruments.
    Bürklein S; Schäfer E
    Int Endod J; 2006 Dec; 39(12):945-51. PubMed ID: 17107539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of the shaping abilities of 4 nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated root canals.
    Yun HH; Kim SK
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Feb; 95(2):228-33. PubMed ID: 12582365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Shaping ability of progressive versus constant taper instruments in simulated root canals.
    Yang GB; Zhou XD; Zhang H; Wu HK
    Int Endod J; 2006 Oct; 39(10):791-9. PubMed ID: 16948665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Root canal preparation with Endo-Eze AET: changes in root canal shape assessed by micro-computed tomography.
    Paqué F; Barbakow F; Peters OA
    Int Endod J; 2005 Jul; 38(7):456-64. PubMed ID: 15946266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Efficacy of rotary instruments with greater taper in preparing oval root canals.
    Elayouti A; Chu AL; Kimionis I; Klein C; Weiger R; Löst C
    Int Endod J; 2008 Dec; 41(12):1088-92. PubMed ID: 19133098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The evaluation of the ability of Apex D.S.P. to determine the length of root canal. In vitro study].
    Lewińska E; Lipski M; Marciniak-Paradowska M; Woźniak K; Lichota D
    Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2008; 54(2):37-40. PubMed ID: 19374229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.