123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9823809)
1. Prospective, randomized trial comparing pain and complications between diathermy and scissors for closed hemorrhoidectomy.
Ibrahim S; Tsang C; Lee YL; Eu KW; Seow-Choen F
Dis Colon Rectum; 1998 Nov; 41(11):1418-20. PubMed ID: 9823809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diathermy excisional hemorrhoidectomy: a prospective randomized study comparing pedicle ligation and pedicle coagulation.
Bessa SS
Dis Colon Rectum; 2011 Nov; 54(11):1405-11. PubMed ID: 21979186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prospective, randomized trial comparing diathermy and Harmonic Scalpel hemorrhoidectomy.
Tan JJ; Seow-Choen F
Dis Colon Rectum; 2001 May; 44(5):677-9. PubMed ID: 11357028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Randomized, clinical trial of Ligasure vs conventional diathermy in hemorrhoidectomy.
Franklin EJ; Seetharam S; Lowney J; Horgan PG
Dis Colon Rectum; 2003 Oct; 46(10):1380-3. PubMed ID: 14530679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prospective, randomized trial comparing diathermy excision and diathermy coagulation for symptomatic, prolapsed hemorrhoids.
Quah HM; Seow-Choen F
Dis Colon Rectum; 2004 Mar; 47(3):367-70. PubMed ID: 14991499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Stapled hemorrhoidectomy vs closed diathermy-excision hemorrhoidectomy without suture-ligation: a case-controlled trial.
Araujo SE; de Caravatto PP; Dumarco RB; Sousa M
Hepatogastroenterology; 2007 Dec; 54(80):2243-8. PubMed ID: 18265642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Double-blind, randomized trial comparing Harmonic Scalpel hemorrhoidectomy, bipolar scissors hemorrhoidectomy, and scissors excision: ligation technique.
Chung CC; Ha JP; Tai YP; Tsang WW; Li MK
Dis Colon Rectum; 2002 Jun; 45(6):789-94. PubMed ID: 12072632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Day-case stapled (circular) vs. diathermy hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized, controlled trial evaluating surgical and functional outcome.
Kairaluoma M; Nuorva K; Kellokumpu I
Dis Colon Rectum; 2003 Jan; 46(1):93-9. PubMed ID: 12544528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prospective, randomized trial comparing pain and clinical function after conventional scissors excision/ligation vs. diathermy excision without ligation for symptomatic prolapsed hemorrhoids.
Seow-Choen F; Ho YH; Ang HG; Goh HS
Dis Colon Rectum; 1992 Dec; 35(12):1165-9. PubMed ID: 1473420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Randomized trial comparing diathermy hemorrhoidectomy with the scissor dissection Milligan-Morgan operation.
Andrews BT; Layer GT; Jackson BT; Nicholls RJ
Dis Colon Rectum; 1993 Jun; 36(6):580-3. PubMed ID: 8500376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A randomized, controlled trial of diathermy hemorrhoidectomy vs. stapled hemorrhoidectomy in an intended day-care setting with longer-term follow-up.
Cheetham MJ; Cohen CR; Kamm MA; Phillips RK
Dis Colon Rectum; 2003 Apr; 46(4):491-7. PubMed ID: 12682543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ligasure vs. conventional diathermy in excisional hemorrhoidectomy: a prospective, randomized study.
Bessa SS
Dis Colon Rectum; 2008 Jun; 51(6):940-4. PubMed ID: 18273670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Stapled hemorrhoidectomy--cost and effectiveness. Randomized, controlled trial including incontinence scoring, anorectal manometry, and endoanal ultrasound assessments at up to three months.
Ho YH; Cheong WK; Tsang C; Ho J; Eu KW; Tang CL; Seow-Choen F
Dis Colon Rectum; 2000 Dec; 43(12):1666-75. PubMed ID: 11156449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Randomized controlled trial of LigaSure with submucosal dissection versus Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy for prolapsed hemorrhoids.
Wang JY; Lu CY; Tsai HL; Chen FM; Huang CJ; Huang YS; Huang TJ; Hsieh JS
World J Surg; 2006 Mar; 30(3):462-6. PubMed ID: 16479346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ligasure Precise vs. conventional diathermy for Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy: a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial.
Altomare DF; Milito G; Andreoli R; Arcanà F; Tricomi N; Salafia C; Segre D; Pecorella G; Pulvirenti d'Urso A; Cracco N; Giovanardi G; Romano G;
Dis Colon Rectum; 2008 May; 51(5):514-9. PubMed ID: 18231834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Surgical treatment of hemorrhoids: prospective, randomized trial comparing closed excisional hemorrhoidectomy and the Harmonic Scalpel technique of excisional hemorrhoidectomy.
Khan S; Pawlak SE; Eggenberger JC; Lee CS; Szilagy EJ; Wu JS; Margolin M D DA
Dis Colon Rectum; 2001 Jun; 44(6):845-9. PubMed ID: 11391146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A prospective randomized trial of transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization with mucopexy versus ultrasonic scalpel hemorrhoidectomy for grade III hemorrhoids.
Tsunoda A; Takahashi T; Kusanagi H
Tech Coloproctol; 2017 Aug; 21(8):657-665. PubMed ID: 28871428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A randomized trial of transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization with anopexy compared with open hemorrhoidectomy in the treatment of hemorrhoids.
Elmér SE; Nygren JO; Lenander CE
Dis Colon Rectum; 2013 Apr; 56(4):484-90. PubMed ID: 23478616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hemorrhoidectomy: open or closed technique? A prospective, randomized clinical trial.
Gençosmanoğlu R; Sad O; Koç D; Inceoğlu R
Dis Colon Rectum; 2002 Jan; 45(1):70-5. PubMed ID: 11786767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Doppler-guided transanal hemorrhoidal dearterilization versus conventional hemorrhoidectomy for treatment of hemorrhoids - early and long-term postoperative results.
Popov V; Yonkov A; Arabadzhieva E; Zhivkov E; Bonev S; Bulanov D; Tasev V; Korukov G; Simonova L; Kandilarov N; Taseva A; Dimitrova V
BMC Surg; 2019 Jan; 19(1):4. PubMed ID: 30630463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
