These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9824764)

  • 1. Evaluating different footprint parameters as a predictor of arch height.
    Shiang TY; Lee SH; Lee SJ; Chu WC
    IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag; 1998; 17(6):62-6. PubMed ID: 9824764
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Describing the medial longitudinal arch using footprint indices and a clinical grading system.
    Queen RM; Mall NA; Hardaker WM; Nunley JA
    Foot Ankle Int; 2007 Apr; 28(4):456-62. PubMed ID: 17475140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The use of arch index to characterize arch height: a digital image processing approach.
    Chu WC; Lee SH; Chu W; Wang TJ; Lee MC
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1995 Nov; 42(11):1088-93. PubMed ID: 7498912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Development of the human feet].
    Mizuno S
    Nihon Rinsho; 1977 Jan; 35(1):109-12. PubMed ID: 557599
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The relationship of static foot structure to dynamic foot function.
    Cavanagh PR; Morag E; Boulton AJ; Young MJ; Deffner KT; Pammer SE
    J Biomech; 1997 Mar; 30(3):243-50. PubMed ID: 9119823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reliability and Correlation of Static and Dynamic Foot Arch Measurement in a Healthy Pediatric Population.
    Scholz T; Zech A; Wegscheider K; Lezius S; Braumann KM; Sehner S; Hollander K
    J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2017 Sep; 107(5):419-427. PubMed ID: 28708428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Structural and functional predictors of regional peak pressures under the foot during walking.
    Morag E; Cavanagh PR
    J Biomech; 1999 Apr; 32(4):359-70. PubMed ID: 10213026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A simplified metatarsus adductus angle.
    Engel E; Erlick N; Krems I
    J Am Podiatry Assoc; 1983 Dec; 73(12):620-8. PubMed ID: 6655195
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The reliability of three techniques for measuring foot position.
    Weiner-Ogilvie S; Rome K
    J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 1998 Aug; 88(8):381-6. PubMed ID: 9735624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The measurement of the medial longitudinal arch in children.
    Gilmour JC; Burns Y
    Foot Ankle Int; 2001 Jun; 22(6):493-8. PubMed ID: 11475457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Locomotory trends in primates expressed by the foot ratios. The adaptation to bipedalism (author's transl)].
    Lessertisseur J; Jouffroy FK
    Folia Primatol (Basel); 1973; 20(2):125-60. PubMed ID: 4207773
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Study of the plantar arch: correlations between podometrical and radiological parameters. results of a prospective study of 79 cases].
    Maes R; Dojcinovic S; Andrianne Y; Burny F
    Rev Med Brux; 2006; 27(5):422-9. PubMed ID: 17144641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Examining the validity of selected measures of foot type: a preliminary study.
    Mathieson I; Upton D; Prior TD
    J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2004; 94(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 15153590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contact force ratio: a new parameter to assess foot arch function.
    Leung AK; Cheng JC; Zhang M; Fan Y; Dong X
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2004 Aug; 28(2):167-74. PubMed ID: 15382810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Towards an efficient and robust foot classification from pedobarographic images.
    Oliveira FP; Sousa A; Santos R; Tavares JM
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2012; 15(11):1181-8. PubMed ID: 21660782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measurement of the medial longitudinal arch.
    Saltzman CL; Nawoczenski DA; Talbot KD
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1995 Jan; 76(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 7811174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fully automated determination of arch angle on weight-bearing foot radiograph.
    Kao EF; Lu CY; Wang CY; Yeh WC; Hsia PK
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Feb; 154():79-88. PubMed ID: 29249349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Variability of footprint ridge density and its use in estimation of sex in forensic examinations.
    Krishan K; Kanchan T; Pathania A; Sharma R; DiMaggio JA
    Med Sci Law; 2015 Oct; 55(4):284-90. PubMed ID: 25413487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A characterization of the geometric architecture of the peritalar joint complex via MRI: an aid to the classification of foot type.
    Stindel E; Udupa JK; Hirsch BE; Odhner D
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1999 Sep; 18(9):753-63. PubMed ID: 10571380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Footprint parameters as a measure of arch height.
    Hawes MR; Nachbauer W; Sovak D; Nigg BM
    Foot Ankle; 1992 Jan; 13(1):22-6. PubMed ID: 1577337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.