223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9825254)
1. Sensitivity of the MTI photoscreener for amblyogenic factors in infancy and early childhood.
Weinand F; Gräf M; Demming K
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 1998 Nov; 236(11):801-5. PubMed ID: 9825254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Detection of red reflex asymmetry by pediatric residents using the Brückner reflex versus the MTI photoscreener.
Paysse EA; Williams GC; Coats DK; Williams EA
Pediatrics; 2001 Oct; 108(4):E74. PubMed ID: 11581482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Screening for amblyopia in preverbal children with photoscreening photographs: II. Sensitivity and specificity of the MTI photoscreener.
Tong PY; Bassin RE; Enke-Miyazaki E; Macke JP; Tielsch JM; Stager DR; Beauchamp GR; Parks MM
Ophthalmology; 2000 Sep; 107(9):1623-9. PubMed ID: 10964818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Photoscreening for amblyogenic factors.
Ottar WL; Scott WE; Holgado SI
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 1995; 32(5):289-95. PubMed ID: 8531032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Screening for amblyogenic factors using a volunteer lay network and the MTI photoscreener. Initial results from 15,000 preschool children in a statewide effort.
Donahue SP; Johnson TM; Leonard-Martin TC
Ophthalmology; 2000 Sep; 107(9):1637-44; discussion 1645-6. PubMed ID: 10964820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluating photoscreeners II: MTI and fortune videorefractor.
Cooper CD; Gole GA; Hall JE; Colville DJ; Carden SM; Bowling FG
Aust N Z J Ophthalmol; 1999 Dec; 27(6):387-98. PubMed ID: 10641896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pediatric photoscreening for strabismus and refractive errors in a high-risk population.
Simons BD; Siatkowski RM; Schiffman JC; Berry BE; Flynn JT
Ophthalmology; 1999 Jun; 106(6):1073-80. PubMed ID: 10366073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The efficacy of photoscreening for amblyopiagenic factors in a high risk population.
Enzenauer RW
Binocul Vis Strabismus Q; 2003; 18(4):233-40. PubMed ID: 14653776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Polaroid photoscreening for amblyogenic factors. An improved methodology.
Freedman HL; Preston KL
Ophthalmology; 1992 Dec; 99(12):1785-95. PubMed ID: 1480393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Photoscreening for refractive errors in children and young adults with severe learning disabilities using the MTI photoscreener.
Watts P; Walker K; Beck L
Eye (Lond); 1999 Jun; 13 ( Pt 3a)():363-8. PubMed ID: 10624435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison between the plusoptiX and MTI Photoscreeners.
Matta NS; Arnold RW; Singman EL; Silbert DI
Arch Ophthalmol; 2009 Dec; 127(12):1591-5. PubMed ID: 20008713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sensitivity of photoscreening to detect high-magnitude amblyogenic factors.
Donahue SP; Johnson TM; Ottar W; Scott WE
J AAPOS; 2002 Apr; 6(2):86-91. PubMed ID: 11997804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Critical Assessment of an Ocular Photoscreener.
Williams T; Morgan LA; High R; Suh DW
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2018 May; 55(3):194-199. PubMed ID: 29257181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Screening for amblyopia in preverbal children with photoscreening photographs. National Children's Eye Care Foundation Vision Screening Study Group.
Tong PY; Enke-Miyazaki E; Bassin RE; Tielsch JM; Stager DR; Beauchamp GR; Parks MM
Ophthalmology; 1998 May; 105(5):856-63. PubMed ID: 9593387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of the iScreen and the MTI photoscreeners for the detection of amblyopia risk factors in children.
Silbert DI; Arnold RW; Matta NS
J AAPOS; 2013 Feb; 17(1):34-7. PubMed ID: 23415034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The accuracy of the plusoptiX A08 photoscreener in detecting risk factors for amblyopia in central Iowa.
Bloomberg JD; Suh DW
J AAPOS; 2013 Jun; 17(3):301-4. PubMed ID: 23791414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Screening for amblyopia in preverbal children with photoscreening photographs. III. improved grading criteria for hyperopia.
Tong PY; Macke JP; Bassin RE; Everett M; Enke-Miyazaki E; Tielsch JM; Stager DR; Parks MM; Beauchamp GR
Ophthalmology; 2000 Sep; 107(9):1630-6. PubMed ID: 10964819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Possibilities and limitations of amblyopia screening with auto-refractometers].
Ehrt O
Ophthalmologe; 2016 Apr; 113(4):289-95. PubMed ID: 27059984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [The performance of visual photoscreening for Chinese preschool children aged 4 to 5 years].
Li R; Huang D; Zhu H; Sun QG; Wang Y; Zhang XH; Zhao XY; He J; Liu L; Zhou JJ; Liu H
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Mar; 56(3):189-196. PubMed ID: 32187947
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Does assessing eye alignment along with refractive error or visual acuity increase sensitivity for detection of strabismus in preschool vision screening?
Vision in Preschoolers Study Group
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Jul; 48(7):3115-25. PubMed ID: 17591881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
