These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9825594)

  • 1. Affected sib-pair methods for detecting linkage to dichotomous traits: review of the methodology.
    Holmans P
    Hum Biol; 1998 Dec; 70(6):1025-40. PubMed ID: 9825594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The method of sib-pair linkage analysis in context of case-control design.
    Yang Q; Atkinson M; Sun F; Sherman S; Khoury MJ
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):939-44. PubMed ID: 9433604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of evidence for linkage from different analytic methods.
    Bull SB; Pinnaduwage D; Shin J; Xie F; Tritchler D
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):965-70. PubMed ID: 9433608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Testing the utility of mod scores and sib-pair analysis to detect presence of disease susceptibility loci.
    Neuman RJ; Xian H
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):1035-40. PubMed ID: 9433620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Detection of major genes underlying several quantitative traits associated with a common disease using different ascertainment schemes.
    Iyengar S; Calafell F; Kidd KK
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):809-14. PubMed ID: 9433582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sib-pair linkage analyses of nuclear family data: quantitative versus dichotomous disease classification.
    Korczak JF; Goldstein AM
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):827-32. PubMed ID: 9433585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sequential sib-pair and association studies to detect genes in quantitative traits.
    Savage A; Sun F; Crawford DC; Ashley AE; Yang Q; Sherman SL
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):885-90. PubMed ID: 9433595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The impact of genotyping error on family-based analysis of quantitative traits.
    Abecasis GR; Cherny SS; Cardon LR
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2001 Feb; 9(2):130-4. PubMed ID: 11313746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Genome screening using extremely discordant and extremely concordant sib pairs.
    Gu C; Todorov AA; Rao DC
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):791-6. PubMed ID: 9433579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multipoint analysis of quantitative traits.
    Marlow AJ; John S; Worthington J
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):845-50. PubMed ID: 9433588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Nonparametric trend statistic incorporating dispersion differences in sib pair linkage for quantitative traits.
    Kim MK; Hong YJ; Song HH
    Hum Hered; 2006; 62(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 16954696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of smoothing techniques in the interpretation of results from genomic scans using sib-pair data.
    Siegmund KD; Todorov AA; Rao DC; Borecki IB
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):1047-52. PubMed ID: 9433622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effectiveness of extreme discordant sib pairs to detect oligogenic disease loci.
    Rogus JJ; Harrington DP; Jorgenson E; Xu X
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):879-84. PubMed ID: 9433594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The performance of MIM in comparison with MAPMAKER/SIBS to detect QTLs.
    Shugart YY; Goldgar DE
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):897-902. PubMed ID: 9433597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comprehensive analysis of complex traits in problem 2A.
    Juo SH; Beaty TH; Duffy DL; Maestri NE; Prenger VL; Zeiger J; Lei HH; Coresh J
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):815-20. PubMed ID: 9433583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A variance component approach to dichotomous trait linkage analysis using a threshold model.
    Duggirala R; Williams JT; Williams-Blangero S; Blangero J
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):987-92. PubMed ID: 9433612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of misspecification of allele frequencies on the power of Haseman-Elston sib-pair linkage method for quantitative traits.
    Mandal DM; Wilson AF; Bailey-Wilson JE
    Am J Med Genet; 2001 Nov; 103(4):308-13. PubMed ID: 11746011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of adjustments for intermediate phenotypes on the power to detect linkage.
    Arnett DK; Pankow JS; Atwood LD; Sellers TA
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):749-54. PubMed ID: 9433572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Genetic Analysis Workshop II: sib pair screening tests for linkage.
    Elston RC
    Genet Epidemiol; 1984; 1(2):175-8. PubMed ID: 14968835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Approaches to genetic linkage analysis.
    Teare MD
    Methods Mol Biol; 2011; 713():55-67. PubMed ID: 21153611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.