416 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9826863)
1. Comparison of normal sinus rhythm and pacing rate in children with minute ventilation single chamber rate adaptive permanent pacemakers.
Celiker A; Ceviz N; Alehan D; Lenk MK; Ozme S
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1998 Nov; 21(11 Pt 1):2100-4. PubMed ID: 9826863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Efficacy and safety of ventricular rate responsive pacing in children with complete atrioventricular block.
Ragonese P; Guccione P; Drago F; Turchetta A; Calzolari A; Formigari R
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1994 Apr; 17(4 Pt 1):603-10. PubMed ID: 7516544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of continuously recorded sensor and sinus rates during daily life activities and standardized exercise testing: efficacy of automatically optimized rate adaptive dual sensor pacing to simulate sinus rhythm.
Lau CP; Leung SK; Guerola M; Crijns HJ
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Nov; 19(11 Pt 2):1672-7. PubMed ID: 8945022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Benefits and limitations of rate adaptive pacing under laboratory and daily life conditions in patients with minute ventilation single chamber pacemakers.
Osswald S; Leiggener C; Buser PT; Pfisterer ME; Burckhardt D; Burkart F
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Jun; 19(6):890-8. PubMed ID: 8774818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of rate-responsive pacemakers by transesophageal Holter monitoring of spontaneous atrial rate.
Bongiorni MG; Soldati E; Paperini L; Pozzolini A; Levorato D; Arena G; Pistelli P; Quirino G; Biagini A; Contini C
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Dec; 13(12 Pt 2):1755-60. PubMed ID: 1704536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Superior cardiac hemodynamics of atrioventricular synchrony over rate responsive pacing at submaximal exercise: observations in activity sensing DDDR pacemakers.
Lau CP; Wong CK; Leung WH; Liu WX
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Dec; 13(12 Pt 2):1832-7. PubMed ID: 1704550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Rate-adaptive cardiac pacing in children using a minute ventilation biosensor.
Yabek SM; Wernly J; Chick TW; Berman W; McWilliams B
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Dec; 13(12 Pt 2):2108-12. PubMed ID: 1704603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Rate responsive cardiac pacing using a minute ventilation sensor.
Abrahamsen AM; Barvik S; Aarsland T; Dickstein K
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1993 Aug; 16(8):1650-5. PubMed ID: 7690933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Physiological benefits of a pacemaker with dual chamber pacing at low heart rates and single chamber rate responsive pacing during exercise.
French WJ; Haskell RJ; Wesley GW; Florio J
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1988 Nov; 11(11 Pt 2):1840-5. PubMed ID: 2463556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Atrial arrhythmia management with sensor controlled atrial refractory period and automatic mode switching in patients with minute ventilation sensing dual chamber rate adaptive pacemakers.
Lau CP; Tai YT; Fong PC; Li JP; Chung FL
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1992 Oct; 15(10 Pt 1):1504-14. PubMed ID: 1383962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of the normal sinus node with seven types of rate responsive pacemaker during everyday activity.
Sulke AN; Pipilis A; Henderson RA; Bucknall CA; Sowton E
Br Heart J; 1990 Jul; 64(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 2390399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Rate augmentation and atrial arrhythmias in DDDR pacing.
Spencer WH; Markowitz T; Alagona P
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Dec; 13(12 Pt 2):1847-51. PubMed ID: 1704552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. AAIR versus DDDR pacing in patients with impaired sinus node chronotropy: an echocardiographic and cardiopulmonary study.
Vardas PE; Simantirakis EN; Parthenakis FI; Chrysostomakis SI; Skalidis EI; Zuridakis EG
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Jul; 20(7):1762-8. PubMed ID: 9249829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of maximum heart rate on oxygen kinetics and exercise performance at low and high workloads.
Carmouche DG; Bubien RS; Kay GN
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1998 Apr; 21(4 Pt 1):679-86. PubMed ID: 9584297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Is activity sensored pacing in children and young adults a feasible option?
Zeigler VL; Gillette PC; Kratz J
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Dec; 13(12 Pt 2):2104-7. PubMed ID: 1704602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of adaptive rate response provided by accelerometer, minute ventilation and dual sensor compared with normal sinus rhythm during exercise: a self-controlled study in chronotropically competent subjects.
Cao Y; Zhang Y; Su Y; Bai J; Wang W; Ge J
Chin Med J (Engl); 2015 Jan; 128(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 25563309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Use of single lead VDD pacing in children.
Seiden HS; Camuñas JL; Fishburger SB; Golinko RJ; Steinberg LG; Shagong U; Rossi AF
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Aug; 20(8 Pt 1):1967-74. PubMed ID: 9272535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pacemakers of the 1980s. An overview.
Sukhum P
Postgrad Med; 1986 Mar; 79(4):173-4, 177-83, 186-8. PubMed ID: 3952041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Rate responsive pacing using a minute ventilation sensor.
Mond H; Strathmore N; Kertes P; Hunt D; Baker G
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1988 Nov; 11(11 Pt 2):1866-74. PubMed ID: 2463560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sinus node function in children with congenital complete atrioventricular block.
Beaufort-Krol GC; Stienstra Y; Bink-Boelkens MT
Europace; 2007 Sep; 9(9):844-7. PubMed ID: 17550906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
