These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9827266)

  • 1. Two different worlds we live in.
    Schachter J
    Clin Infect Dis; 1998 Nov; 27(5):1181-5. PubMed ID: 9827266
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Can we do better than discrepant analysis for new diagnostic test evaluation?
    Miller WC
    Clin Infect Dis; 1998 Nov; 27(5):1186-93. PubMed ID: 9827267
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reproducibility and performance of the AMPLICOR Chlamydia trachomatis test.
    Rosenstraus M
    J Clin Microbiol; 1997 Dec; 35(12):3361-2. PubMed ID: 9399561
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improvement of cervical Chlamydia detection in asymptomatic family planning attendees by using Amplicor Chlamydia trachomatis assay.
    Chout R; Vaton S; Quist D; Bucher R; Leguyader-Desprees P; Sayada C
    Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand); 1995 Jul; 41(5):731-6. PubMed ID: 7580853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Discrepant analysis and screening for Chlamydia trachomatis.
    Schachter J; Stamm WE; Quinn TC
    Lancet; 1998 Jan; 351(9097):217-8. PubMed ID: 9449898
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prospective comparison of cell cultures and nucleic acid amplification tests for laboratory diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis Infections.
    Jespersen DJ; Flatten KS; Jones MF; Smith TF
    J Clin Microbiol; 2005 Oct; 43(10):5324-6. PubMed ID: 16208009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [The risk of false positive Chlamydia tests should be empirically determinated].
    Melbye H
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1995 Nov; 115(28):3549-50. PubMed ID: 7491612
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of bias in diagnostic-test sensitivity and specificity estimates computed by discrepant analysis.
    Green TA; Black CM; Johnson RE
    J Clin Microbiol; 1998 Feb; 36(2):375-81. PubMed ID: 9466744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The discrepancy in discrepant analysis.
    Hadgu A
    Lancet; 1996 Aug; 348(9027):592-3. PubMed ID: 8774575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [DNA amplification in the diagnosis of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infection].
    Ostergaard L
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1999 Jun; 119(16):2350-6. PubMed ID: 10414201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improved isolation of Chlamydia trachomatis from a low-prevalence population by using polyethylene glycol.
    Gibson JP; Egerer RM; Wiedbrauk DL
    J Clin Microbiol; 1993 Feb; 31(2):292-5. PubMed ID: 8432814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. One-tube nested polymerase chain reaction in the diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infections.
    Zanetti S; Sechi L; Pinna A; Sanna A; Usai D; Carta F; Fadda G
    New Microbiol; 1997 Jan; 20(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 9037666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in a low prevalence population.
    Ostergaard L
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1995 May; 14(5):471-2. PubMed ID: 7556244
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mucus digestion improves the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae on the cobas 4800.
    Miller A; Bromhead C; Jones M; Tustin P
    Sex Transm Dis; 2012 Sep; 39(9):733-4. PubMed ID: 22902672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reply to: Sampling for Chlamydia trachomatis infection.
    Boman J; Nylander E
    Int J STD AIDS; 2010 Jul; 21(7):530. PubMed ID: 20852212
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The discovery of Chlamydia trachomatis.
    Taylor-Robinson D
    Sex Transm Infect; 2017 Feb; 93(1):10. PubMed ID: 28100758
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Direct diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis genital infections: culture or PCR?].
    Labau E; Henry S; Bennet P; Massip P; Chabanon G
    Pathol Biol (Paris); 1998 Dec; 46(10):813-8. PubMed ID: 9922999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of laboratory testing methods for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in the era of nucleic acid amplification.
    Battle TJ; Golden MR; Suchland KL; Counts JM; Hughes JP; Stamm WE; Holmes KK
    J Clin Microbiol; 2001 Aug; 39(8):2924-7. PubMed ID: 11474014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [When happiness of marriage depends on epidemiologic knowledge].
    Salvesen KA
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1995 Oct; 115(25):3112-3. PubMed ID: 8539688
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bias in the evaluation of DNA-amplification tests for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis.
    Schachter J
    Stat Med; 1998 Jul; 17(13):1527-30. PubMed ID: 9695197
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.