182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9828055)
1. Chronic hemodialysis: Kt/V or solute removal index to evaluate the effective delivered dose?
Di Filippo S; Manzoni C; Corti M; Locatelli F
Int J Artif Organs; 1998 Sep; 21(9):509-14. PubMed ID: 9828055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Urea kinetics during sustained low-efficiency dialysis in critically ill patients requiring renal replacement therapy.
Marshall MR; Golper TA; Shaver MJ; Alam MG; Chatoth DK
Am J Kidney Dis; 2002 Mar; 39(3):556-70. PubMed ID: 11877575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Effect of gender and body mass on hemodialysis dose].
Kovacić V; Sain M; Dzanko D
Acta Med Croatica; 2003; 57(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 12876860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biostat 1000 and Daugirdas blood-based hemodialysis quantification: agreement and reproducibility.
Marshall MR; Santamaria P; Collins JF
Am J Kidney Dis; 1998 Jun; 31(6):1011-8. PubMed ID: 9631847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ionic dialysance allows an adequate estimate of urea distribution volume in hemodialysis patients.
Di Filippo S; Manzoni C; Andrulli S; Pontoriero G; Dell'Oro C; La Milia V; Tentori F; Crepaldi M; Bigi MC; Locatelli F
Kidney Int; 2004 Aug; 66(2):786-91. PubMed ID: 15253734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of two methods for predicting equilibrated Kt/V (eKt/V) using true eKt/V value.
Marsenić O; Peco-Antić A; Jovanović O
Pediatr Nephrol; 1999 Jun; 13(5):418-22. PubMed ID: 10412862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A simple method for the calculation of dialysis Kt factor as a quantitative measure of removal efficiency of uremic retention solutes: Applicability to high-dialysate vs low-dialysate volume technologies.
Colussi G; Brunati CCM; Gervasi F; Montoli A; Vergani D; Curci F; Minetti E
PLoS One; 2020; 15(5):e0233331. PubMed ID: 32469929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Imprecision of the hemodialysis dose when measured directly from urea removal. Hemodialysis Study Group.
Depner TA; Greene T; Gotch FA; Daugirdas JT; Keshaviah PR; Star RA
Kidney Int; 1999 Feb; 55(2):635-47. PubMed ID: 9987088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Urea distribution volume and ionic dialysance].
Pozzoni P; Pozzi M; Di Filippo S
G Ital Nefrol; 2004; 21 Suppl 30():S226-30. PubMed ID: 15750991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of the length of each hemodialysis session by on-line dialysate urea monitoring.
Hernandez-Herrera G; Martin-Malo A; Rodriguez M; Aljama P
Nephron; 2001 Sep; 89(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 11528230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. What volume to choose to assess online Kt/V?
Casino FG; Mancini E; Santarsia G; Mostacci SD; D'Elia F; Di Carlo M; Iannuzzella F; Rossi L; Vernaglione L; Grimaldi D; Rapanà R; Basile C
J Nephrol; 2020 Feb; 33(1):137-146. PubMed ID: 31392658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of methods to predict equilibrated Kt/V in the HEMO Pilot Study.
Daugirdas JT; Depner TA; Gotch FA; Greene T; Keshaviah P; Levin NW; Schulman G
Kidney Int; 1997 Nov; 52(5):1395-405. PubMed ID: 9350665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. On-line assessment of delivered dialysis dose.
Di Filippo S; Andrulli S; Manzoni C; Corti M; Locatelli F
Kidney Int; 1998 Jul; 54(1):263-7. PubMed ID: 9648087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Postdialysis urea rebound: determinants and influence on dialysis delivery in chronic hemodialysis patients.
Leblanc M; Charbonneau R; Lalumière G; Cartier P; Déziel C
Am J Kidney Dis; 1996 Feb; 27(2):253-61. PubMed ID: 8659502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Improving the "second generation Daugirdas equation" to estimate Kt/V on the once-weekly haemodialysis schedule.
Casino FG; Deira J; Suárez MA; Aguilar J; Santarsia G; Basile C
J Nephrol; 2021 Jun; 34(3):907-912. PubMed ID: 33515379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Disease severity adversely affects delivery of dialysis in acute renal failure.
Schiffl H
Nephron Clin Pract; 2007; 107(4):c163-9. PubMed ID: 17975323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of hemodialysis adequacy using online Kt/V and single-pool variable-volume urea Kt/V.
Grzegorzewska AE; Banachowicz W
Int Urol Nephrol; 2008; 40(3):771-8. PubMed ID: 18592391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ionic dialysance and determination of Kt/V in on-line hemodiafiltration with simultaneous
pre- and post-dilution.
Créput C; Toledano D; Petitclerc T
Int J Artif Organs; 2013 May; 36(5):327-34. PubMed ID: 23504813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Two spent dialysate samples are sufficient for hemodialysis efficacy assessment.
Kovacic V; Ljutic D
Int J Artif Organs; 2005 Jan; 28(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 15742306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validation of different methods to calculate Kt/V considering postdialysis rebound.
Maduell F; Garcia-Valdecasas J; Garcia H; Hernández-Jaras J; Sigüenza F; del Pozo C; Giner R; Moll R; Garrigos E
Nephrol Dial Transplant; 1997 Sep; 12(9):1928-33. PubMed ID: 9306345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]