These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9829116)

  • 1. Repeatability and comparability of automated keratometry: the Nikon NRK-8000, the Nidek KM-800 and the Bausch and Lomb keratometer.
    Elliott M; Simpson T; Richter D; Fonn D
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1998 May; 18(3):285-93. PubMed ID: 9829116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Repeatability and accuracy of automated refraction: a comparison of the Nikon NRK-8000, the Nidek AR-1000, and subjective refraction.
    Elliott M; Simpson T; Richter D; Fonn D
    Optom Vis Sci; 1997 Jun; 74(6):434-8. PubMed ID: 9255823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Keratometry evaluations with the Pentacam high resolution in comparison with the automated keratometry and conventional corneal topography.
    Módis L; Szalai E; Kolozsvári B; Németh G; Vajas A; Berta A
    Cornea; 2012 Jan; 31(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 22081146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of the EyeSys model II computerized videokeratoscope. Part I: Clinical assessment.
    Dave T; Ruston D; Fowler C
    Optom Vis Sci; 1998 Sep; 75(9):647-55. PubMed ID: 9778697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of posture and artificial tears on corneal power measurements with a handheld automated keratometer.
    Lam AK; Chan R; Chiu R
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Mar; 30(3):645-52. PubMed ID: 15050262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of corneal powers obtained from 4 different devices.
    Shirayama M; Wang L; Weikert MP; Koch DD
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2009 Oct; 148(4):528-535.e1. PubMed ID: 19541287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Repeatability and reproducibility of posterior corneal curvature measurements by combined scanning-slit and placido-disc topography after LASIK.
    Maldonado MJ; Nieto JC; Díez-Cuenca M; Piñero DP
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Nov; 113(11):1918-26. PubMed ID: 16935339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Repeatability of Keratometry Measurements Obtained With Three Topographers in Keratoconic and Normal Corneas.
    Guilbert E; Saad A; Elluard M; Grise-Dulac A; Rouger H; Gatinel D
    J Refract Surg; 2016 Mar; 32(3):187-92. PubMed ID: 27027626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validation of a handheld automated keratometer in adults.
    Noonan CP; Rao GP; Kaye SB; Green JR; Chandna A
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 1998 Mar; 24(3):411-4. PubMed ID: 9559480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Corneal power measurements in fixating versus anesthetized nonfixating children using a handheld keratometer.
    Rogers DL; Whitehead GR; Stephens JA; Fellows RR; Bremer DL; McGregor ML; Golden RP; Cassady CB; Rogers GL
    J AAPOS; 2010 Feb; 14(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 20227615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Anterior segment biometry with the Pentacam: comprehensive assessment of repeatability of automated measurements.
    Shankar H; Taranath D; Santhirathelagan CT; Pesudovs K
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Jan; 34(1):103-13. PubMed ID: 18165089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reliability of Orbscan II topography measurements in relation to refractive status.
    Rabsilber TM; Becker KA; Auffarth GU
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Aug; 31(8):1607-13. PubMed ID: 16129300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of instrument rotation on handheld keratometry.
    Lam AK; Chan R; Chiu R
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Dec; 30(12):2590-4. PubMed ID: 15617929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Wavefront- and topography-guided ablation in myopic eyes using Zyoptix.
    Kanjani N; Jacob S; Agarwal A; Agarwal A; Agarwal S; Agarwal T; Doshi A; Doshi S
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Feb; 30(2):398-402. PubMed ID: 15030830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of Orbscan II corneal topography in individuals with myopia.
    Wei RH; Lim L; Chan WK; Tan DT
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Feb; 113(2):177-83. PubMed ID: 16458090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Internal anterior chamber diameter using optical coherence tomography compared with white-to-white distances using automated measurements.
    Kohnen T; Thomala MC; Cichocki M; Strenger A
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Nov; 32(11):1809-13. PubMed ID: 17081862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Comparative results of keratometry with three different keratometers after LASIK].
    Schäfer S; Kürzinger G; Spraul CW; Kampmeier J
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2005 May; 222(5):419-23. PubMed ID: 15912460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of general anesthesia and muscle relaxants on keratometry measurements using a handheld keratometer.
    Al-Haddad C; Jurdy L; Farhat A; Farah F; Aouad M
    J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2014; 51(5):308-12. PubMed ID: 25036105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Precision of 5 different keratometry devices.
    Laursen JVN; Jeppesen P; Olsen T
    Int Ophthalmol; 2016 Feb; 36(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 25820577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of corneal thickness on comparative intraocular pressure measurements with Goldmann and non-contact tonometers in keratoconus.
    Stabuc Silih M; Hawlina M
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2003 Dec; 220(12):843-7. PubMed ID: 14704941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.