These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9829116)
21. Comparison of three computerized videokeratoscopy systems with keratometry. Moura RC; Bowyer BL; Stevens SX; Rowsey JJ Cornea; 1998 Sep; 17(5):522-8. PubMed ID: 9756447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of manual and automated methods to determine horizontal corneal diameter. Baumeister M; Terzi E; Ekici Y; Kohnen T J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Feb; 30(2):374-80. PubMed ID: 15030827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Repeatability of oculus pentacam metrics derived from corneal topography. Miranda MA; Radhakrishnan H; O'donnell C Cornea; 2009 Jul; 28(6):657-66. PubMed ID: 19512905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Precision of autokeratometry expressed as confidence ellipses in Euclidian 2-space. Naeser K; Guo S Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2000 Mar; 20(2):160-8. PubMed ID: 10829140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Reliability of noncontact pachymetry after laser in situ keratomileusis. Maldonado MJ; López-Miguel A; Nieto JC; Cano-Parra J; Calvo B; Alió JL Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Sep; 50(9):4135-41. PubMed ID: 19357360 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. An evaluation of keratometry in 6-year-old children. Huynh SC; Mai TQ; Kifley A; Wang JJ; Rose KA; Mitchell P Cornea; 2006 May; 25(4):383-7. PubMed ID: 16670473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Optic biometry in intraocular lense calculation for cataract surgery. Comparison with usual methods]. Siahmed K; Muraine M; Brasseur G J Fr Ophtalmol; 2001 Nov; 24(9):922-6. PubMed ID: 11912834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effect of soft contact lenses on optical measurements of axial length and keratometry for biometry in eyes with corneal irregularities. Lewis JR; Knellinger AE; Mahmoud AM; Mauger TF Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Aug; 49(8):3371-8. PubMed ID: 18441314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Repeatability, reproducibility, and agreement characteristics of rotating Scheimpflug photography and scanning-slit corneal topography for corneal power measurement. Kawamorita T; Uozato H; Kamiya K; Bax L; Tsutsui K; Aizawa D; Shimizu K J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Jan; 35(1):127-33. PubMed ID: 19101435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Short-term repeatability of hand-held keratometry measurements. Shin JA; Manny RE; Kleinstein RN; Mutti DO; Zadnik K Optom Vis Sci; 1999 Apr; 76(4):247-53. PubMed ID: 10333188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Consideration of the posterior corneal curvature for assessment of corneal power after myopic LASIK. Langenbucher A; Torres F; Behrens A; Suarez E; Haigis W; Seitz B Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2004 Jun; 82(3 Pt 1):264-9. PubMed ID: 15115446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [A research on clinical values of corneal topography and keratometer in measuring astigmatism]. Zhang K; Li Z; Lu W Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 1998 Nov; 34(6):448-50. PubMed ID: 11877251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Validity and limitations of the Nidek NT-4000 non-contact tonometer: a clinical study. Regine F; Scuderi GL; Cesareo M; Ricci F; Cedrone C; Nucci C Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2006 Jan; 26(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 16390480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A hand-held keratometer. Lam AK Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1995 May; 15(3):227-30. PubMed ID: 7659423 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]