181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9830655)
1. Observer differentiation of mechanical defects versus natural dental caries cavitations on monitor-displayed images with imaging plate readout.
Kang BC; Goldsmith LJ; Farman AG
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Nov; 86(5):595-600. PubMed ID: 9830655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Observer differentiation of proximal enamel mechanical defects versus natural proximal dental caries with computed dental radiography.
Kang BC; Farman AG; Scarfe WC; Goldsmith LJ
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1996 Oct; 82(4):459-65. PubMed ID: 8899789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mechanical defects in dental enamel vs. natural dental caries: observer differentiation using Ektaspeed Plus film.
Kang B-C ; Farman AG; Scarfe WC; Goldsmith LJ
Caries Res; 1996; 30(2):156-62. PubMed ID: 8833141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Approximal caries depth assessment with storage phosphor versus film radiography. Evaluation of the caries-specific Oslo enhancement procedure.
Svanaes DB; Moystad A; Larheim TA
Caries Res; 2000; 34(6):448-53. PubMed ID: 11093017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparing the performance of storage phosphor plate and Insight film images for the detection of proximal caries depth.
Crombie K; Parker ME; Nortje CJ; Sanderink GC
SADJ; 2009 Nov; 64(10):452, 454-6, 458-9. PubMed ID: 20306863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intraoral versus extraoral bitewing radiography in detection of enamel proximal caries: an ex vivo study.
Abu El-Ela WH; Farid MM; Mostafa MS
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(4):20150326. PubMed ID: 26892946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In vivo study of approximal caries depth on storage phosphor plate images compared with dental x-ray film.
Versteeg KH; Sanderink GC; Velders XL; van Ginkel FC; van der Stelt PF
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1997 Aug; 84(2):210-3. PubMed ID: 9269024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Detection of approximal caries with a storage phosphor system. A comparison of enhanced digital images with dental X-ray film.
Møystad A; Svanaes DB; Risnes S; Larheim TA; Gröndahl HG
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Sep; 25(4):202-6. PubMed ID: 9084274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic accuracy of two software modalities for detection of caries lesions in digital radiographs from four dental systems.
Hintze H
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Mar; 35(2):78-82. PubMed ID: 16549433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of standard and task-specific enhancement of Digora storage phosphor images for approximal caries diagnosis.
Møystad A; Svanaes DB; van der Stelt PF; Gröndahl HG; Wenzel A; van Ginkel FC; Kullendorff B; Hintze H; Larheim TA
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Nov; 32(6):390-6. PubMed ID: 15070842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Detection of artificial occlusal caries in a phosphor imaging plate system with two types of LCD monitors versus three different films.
Ilgüy M; Dinçer S; Ilgüy D; Bayirli G
J Digit Imaging; 2009 Jun; 22(3):242-9. PubMed ID: 18949518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of enamel-dentin caries lesions detection using bitewing PSP digital images.
Torres MG; Santos Ada S; Neves FS; Arriaga ML; Campos PS; Crusoé-Rebello I
J Appl Oral Sci; 2011 Oct; 19(5):462-8. PubMed ID: 21986650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic accuracy of intraoral film and direct digital images for detection of simulated recurrent decay.
Nair MK; Ludlow JB; May KN; Nair UP; Johnson MP; Close JM
Oper Dent; 2001; 26(3):223-30. PubMed ID: 11357563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Detection accuracy of proximal caries by phosphor plate and cone-beam computerized tomography images scanned with different resolutions.
Cheng JG; Zhang ZL; Wang XY; Zhang ZY; Ma XC; Li G
Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Aug; 16(4):1015-21. PubMed ID: 21805053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of tube potential and image receptor on the detection of natural proximal caries in primary teeth.
Sogur E; Baksı BG; Orhan K; Paksoy SC; Dogan S; Erdal YS; Mert A
Clin Oral Investig; 2011 Dec; 15(6):901-7. PubMed ID: 20838834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Extraoral imaging for proximal caries detection: Bitewings vs scanogram.
Khan EA; Tyndall DA; Caplan D
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2004 Dec; 98(6):730-7. PubMed ID: 15583548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of digital systems and conventional dental film for the detection of approximal enamel caries.
Pontual AA; de Melo DP; de Almeida SM; Bóscolo FN; Haiter Neto F
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 Oct; 39(7):431-6. PubMed ID: 20841461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. TACT imaging of primary caries.
Tyndall DA; Clifton TL; Webber RL; Ludlow JB; Horton RA
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1997 Aug; 84(2):214-25. PubMed ID: 9269025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of caries detection with four storage phosphor systems and E-speed radiographs.
Hintze H; Wenzel A; Frydenberg M
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 May; 31(3):170-5. PubMed ID: 12058264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Conventional, digital and contrast-enhanced bitewing radiographs in the decision to restore approximal carious lesions.
Haak R; Wicht MJ; Noack MJ
Caries Res; 2001; 35(3):193-9. PubMed ID: 11385199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
