These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9830656)

  • 1. Intraoral radiographic storage phosphor image mean pixel values and signal-to-noise ratio: effects of calibration.
    Hayakawa Y; Farman AG; Kelly MS; Kuroyanagi K
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Nov; 86(5):601-5. PubMed ID: 9830656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Optimum exposure ranges for computed dental radiography.
    Hayakawa Y; Farman AG; Scarfe WC; Kuroyanagi K; Rumack PM; Schick DB
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Apr; 25(2):71-5. PubMed ID: 9446976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dose response of a storage phosphor system for intraoral radiography.
    Stamatakis HC; Welander U; McDavid WD
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Sep; 28(5):272-6. PubMed ID: 10490744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of beam energy and filtration on the signal-to-noise ratio of the Dexis intraoral X-ray detector.
    Kitagawa H; Farman AG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Jan; 33(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 15140818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perceptibility curves for the Digora system.
    Yoshiura K; Welander U; McDavid WD; Li G; Shi XQ; Kawazu T; Tatsumi M; Matsuo T; Kanda S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 May; 32(3):191-7. PubMed ID: 12917286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Radiopacity of resin-based materials measured in film radiographs and storage phosphor plate (Digora).
    Sabbagh J; Vreven J; Leloup G
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(6):677-84. PubMed ID: 15646224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comments on noise and resolution of the DenOptix radiography system.
    Couture RA
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Jun; 95(6):746-51. PubMed ID: 12789159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reproducibility of pixel values for two photostimulable phosphor plates in consecutive standardized scannings.
    Freitas P; Yaedú RY; Rubira-Bullen IR; Escarpinati M; Vieira MC; Schiabel H; Lauris JR
    Braz Oral Res; 2006; 20(3):207-13. PubMed ID: 17119702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Some characteristics of solid-state and photo-stimulable phosphor detectors for intra-oral radiography.
    Borg E
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1999; 139():i-viii, 1-67. PubMed ID: 10635104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Signal-to-noise ratios of 6 intraoral digital sensors.
    Attaelmanan AG; Borg E; Gröndahl HG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 May; 91(5):611-5. PubMed ID: 11346743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quality assurance phantom for digital dental imaging.
    Mah P; McDavid WD; Dove SB
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Nov; 112(5):632-9. PubMed ID: 21862364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Technical report. Processing to achieve high-contrast images with computed dental radiography.
    Hayakawa Y; Farman AG; Scarfe WC; Kuroyanagi K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Sep; 25(4):211-4. PubMed ID: 9084276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Precise image-receptor calibration and monitoring of beam quality with a step wedge.
    Couture RA; Hildebolt CF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Jan; 31(1):56-62. PubMed ID: 11803390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of calibration and automatic greyscale adjustment on detectability of simulated bone lesions using a storage phosphor system.
    Versteeg CH; Sanderink GC; van Ginkel FC; van der Stelt PF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Jul; 27(4):240-4. PubMed ID: 9780903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of image quality in dental radiography, part 2: optimum exposure conditions for detection of small mass changes in 6 intraoral radiography systems.
    Yoshiura K; Kawazu T; Chikui T; Tatsumi M; Tokumori K; Tanaka T; Kanda S
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1999 Jan; 87(1):123-9. PubMed ID: 9927091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluating phantom image quality parameters to optimise patient radiation dose in dental digital radiology.
    Gonzalez L; Vano E; Fernandez R; Ziraldo V; Delgado J; Delgado V; Moro J; Ubeda C
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Aug; 151(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 22232776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Physical properties of a photostimulable phosphor system for intra-oral radiography.
    Stamatakis HC; Welander U; McDavid WD
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 10654033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of image quality parameters of representative intraoral digital radiographic systems.
    Udupa H; Mah P; Dove SB; McDavid WD
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2013 Dec; 116(6):774-83. PubMed ID: 24237729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Feasibility of an image planning system for kilovoltage image-guided radiation therapy.
    Thapa BB; Molloy JA
    Med Phys; 2013 Jun; 40(6):061703. PubMed ID: 23718582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Determination of the optimal conditions for dental subtraction radiography using a storage phosphor system.
    Brettle DS; Ellwood R; Davies R
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Jan; 28(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 10202471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.