These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

72 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9830992)

  • 1. Contact stress at articular surfaces in total joint replacements. Part I: experimental methods.
    Lewis G
    Biomed Mater Eng; 1998; 8(2):91-110. PubMed ID: 9830992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Contact stress at articular surfaces in total joint replacements. Part II: Analytical and numerical methods.
    Lewis G
    Biomed Mater Eng; 1998; 8(5-6):259-78. PubMed ID: 10081590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dynamic in vitro measurement of posterior cruciate ligament load and tibiofemoral stress after TKA in dependence on tibiofemoral slope.
    Ostermeier S; Schlomach C; Hurschler C; Windhagen H; Stukenborg-Colsman C
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Jun; 21(5):525-32. PubMed ID: 16494980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tibiofemoral contact stress after total knee arthroplasty: comparison of fixed and mobile-bearing inlay designs.
    Stukenborg-Colsman C; Ostermeier S; Hurschler C; Wirth CJ
    Acta Orthop Scand; 2002 Dec; 73(6):638-46. PubMed ID: 12553510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An investigation of the effect of conformity of knee hemiarthroplasty designs on contact stress, friction and degeneration of articular cartilage: a tribological study.
    McCann L; Ingham E; Jin Z; Fisher J
    J Biomech; 2009 Jun; 42(9):1326-31. PubMed ID: 19380137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bearing surface design changes affect contact patterns in total knee arthroplasty.
    Cottrell JM; Townsend E; Lipman J; Sculco TP; Wright TM
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Nov; 464():127-31. PubMed ID: 18062045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Tibiofemoral force following total knee arthroplasty: comparison of four prosthesis designs in vitro.
    Nicholls RL; Schirm AC; Jeffcote BO; Kuster MS
    J Orthop Res; 2007 Nov; 25(11):1506-12. PubMed ID: 17568418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A multiaxial force-sensing implantable tibial prosthesis.
    Kirking B; Krevolin J; Townsend C; Colwell CW; D'Lima DD
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(9):1744-51. PubMed ID: 16023656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Surface stress: a factor influencing ultra high molecular weight polyethylene durability in mobile-bearing knee design.
    Morra EA; Heim CS; Greenwald AS
    Orthopedics; 2007 May; 30(5 Suppl):35-8. PubMed ID: 17549865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of an accelerated aging protocol on viscoelastic properties of UHMWPE.
    Lewis G
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2002; 12(3):299-308. PubMed ID: 12446945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of sliding locus on subsurface crack formation in ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene knee component.
    Todo S; Tomita N; Kitakura T; Yamano Y
    Biomed Mater Eng; 1999; 9(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 10436849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of an interpositional spacer on the behaviour of the tibiofemoral joint: a finite element study.
    Checa S; Taylor M; New A
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 Oct; 23(8):1044-52. PubMed ID: 18499317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Contact pressure prediction in total knee joint replacements. Part 2: Application to the design of total knee joint replacements.
    Jin ZM; Stewart T; Auger DD; Dowson D; Fisher J
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 1995; 209(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 7669123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Tribological behavior of artificial hip joint under the effects of magnetic field in dry and lubricated sliding.
    Zaki M; Aljinaidi A; Hamed M
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2003; 13(3):205-21. PubMed ID: 12883170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The influence of design, materials and kinematics on the in vitro wear of total knee replacements.
    McEwen HM; Barnett PI; Bell CJ; Farrar R; Auger DD; Stone MH; Fisher J
    J Biomech; 2005 Feb; 38(2):357-65. PubMed ID: 15598464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tibiofemoral contact behavior is improved in high-flexion cruciate retaining TKA.
    Most E; Sultan PG; Park SE; Papannagari R; Li G
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2006 Nov; 452():59-64. PubMed ID: 16980895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The integrity of welded interfaces in ultra high molecular weight polyethylene: Part 1-Model.
    Buckley CP; Wu J; Haughie DW
    Biomaterials; 2006 Jun; 27(17):3178-86. PubMed ID: 16490249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hydroxyapatite-coated bioalloy surfaces: current status and future challenges.
    Lewis G
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2000; 10(3-4):157-88. PubMed ID: 11202145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pop-top tibial component: elimination of back-side wear with potential modularity.
    Lombardi AV; Berend KR; Mallory TH
    Surg Technol Int; 2004; 13():253-60. PubMed ID: 15744698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of carbon fiber reinforcement on contact area, contact pressure, and time-dependent deformation in polyethylene tibial components.
    Wright TM; Fukubayashi T; Burstein AH
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1981 Sep; 15(5):719-30. PubMed ID: 12659137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.