149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9831085)
1. Development of in vitro performance tests and evaluation of nonabsorbable monofilament sutures for cardiovascular surgery.
Hong T; King MW; Michielsen S; Cheung LW; Mary C; Guzman R; Guidoin R
ASAIO J; 1998; 44(6):776-85. PubMed ID: 9831085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantitative physical and handling characteristics of novel antibacterial braided silk suture materials.
Chen X; Hou D; Tang X; Wang L
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2015 Oct; 50():160-70. PubMed ID: 26143308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of mechanical properties of polyvinylidene fluoride and polypropylene monofilament sutures used for flexor tendon repair.
Wada A; Kubota H; Hatanaka H; Miura H; Iwamoto Y
J Hand Surg Br; 2001 Jun; 26(3):212-6. PubMed ID: 11386769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of Tensile Properties and Knot Security of Surgical Sutures: An In Vitro Mechanical Study.
Wang M; Xiang X; Wang Y; Ren Y; Yang L; Zhang Y
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Jul; 80(7):1215-1222. PubMed ID: 35452601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clamp fixation to prevent unfolding of a suture knot decreases tensile strength of polypropylene sutures.
Türker M; Yalçinozan M; Çirpar M; Çetik Ö; Kalaycioğlu B
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2012 Dec; 20(12):2602-5. PubMed ID: 22261991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of a new polypropylene suture with Prolene.
Chu CC; Pratt L; Zhang L; Hsu A; Chu A
J Appl Biomater; 1993; 4(2):169-81. PubMed ID: 10148624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Does Knot Configuration Improve Tensile Characteristics of Monofilament Suture Materials?
Taysi AE; Taysi NM; Sismanoglu S
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2023 Jan; 81(1):72-79. PubMed ID: 36209892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Why make monofilament sutures out of polyvinylidene fluoride?
Urban E; King MW; Guidoin R; Laroche G; Marois Y; Martin L; Cardou A; Douville Y
ASAIO J; 1994; 40(2):145-56. PubMed ID: 8003751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Handling characteristics of poly(L-lactide-co-epsilon-caprolactone) monofilament suture.
Tomihata K; Suzuki M; Tomita N
Biomed Mater Eng; 2005; 15(5):381-91. PubMed ID: 16179759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative study of knot performance and ease of manipulation of monofilament and braided sutures for arthroscopic applications.
Li X; King M; MacDonald P
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2004 Sep; 12(5):448-52. PubMed ID: 15118814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of tensile and knot security properties of surgical sutures.
Kim JC; Lee YK; Lim BS; Rhee SH; Yang HC
J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2007 Dec; 18(12):2363-9. PubMed ID: 17569012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Unique performance characteristics of Novafil.
Rodeheaver GT; Borzelleca DC; Thacker JG; Edlich RF
Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1987 Mar; 164(3):230-6. PubMed ID: 3547720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Knot performance of polypropylene sutures.
Faulkner BC; Tribble CG; Thacker JG; Rodeheaver GT; Edlich RF
J Biomed Mater Res; 1996; 33(3):187-92. PubMed ID: 8864890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An innovative absorbable coating for the polybutester suture.
Rodeheaver GT; Shimer AL; Boyd LM; Drake DB; Edlich RF
J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2001; 11(1-2):41-54. PubMed ID: 11495104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mechanical properties of commercially available nylon sutures in the United States.
Callahan TL; Lear W; Kruzic JJ; Maughan CB
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2017 May; 105(4):815-819. PubMed ID: 26777335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In Vitro Biomechanical Testing of the Tube Knot.
Chang S; Dong F; Lagman M; Schmidt PL; Irizarry KL; Schulz D; Fahie MA
Vet Surg; 2016 Oct; 45(7):962-967. PubMed ID: 27549511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Study on the mechanical properties of sutures in the process of suturing].
Zhang L; Dai A; Li W; Zhou Z
Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Jun; 36(3):386-392. PubMed ID: 31232540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Review of the physical and surgical technical properties of modern monofilament suture materials].
Lünstedt B; Knoop M; Thiede A
Chirurg; 1986 Aug; 57(8):510-3. PubMed ID: 3533460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical and clinical performance of a new synthetic monofilament absorbable suture.
Rodeheaver GT; Beltran KA; Green CW; Faulkner BC; Stiles BM; Stanimir GW; Traeland H; Fried GM; Brown HC; Edlich RF
J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 1996; 6(3-4):181-98. PubMed ID: 10167360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mechanical performance of monofilament synthetic absorbable sutures.
Rodeheaver GT; Powell TA; Thacker JG; Edlich RF
Am J Surg; 1987 Nov; 154(5):544-7. PubMed ID: 3118727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
