BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

369 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9831154)

  • 21. Potential benefits from deeply inserted cochlear implant electrodes.
    Boyd PJ
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):411-27. PubMed ID: 21248642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Temporal bone investigations on landmarks for conventional or endosteal insertion of cochlear electrodes.
    Pau HW; Just T; Dommerich S; Behrend D
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2007 Sep; 127(9):920-6. PubMed ID: 17712669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Relative importance of monaural sound deprivation and bilateral significant hearing loss in predicting cochlear implantation outcomes.
    Boisvert I; McMahon CM; Tremblay G; Lyxell B
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(6):758-66. PubMed ID: 21750463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Elimination of facial nerve stimulation by reimplantation in cochlear implant subjects.
    Battmer R; Pesch J; Stöver T; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Lenarz M; Lenarz T
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Oct; 27(7):918-22. PubMed ID: 17006341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Intact canal wall drill-out procedure for implantation of the totally ossified cochlea.
    Balkany T; Luntz M; Telischi FF; Hodges AV
    Am J Otol; 1997 Nov; 18(6 Suppl):S58-9. PubMed ID: 9391598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Cochlear implantation in the irradiated temporal bone.
    Adunka OF; Buchman CA
    J Laryngol Otol; 2007 Jan; 121(1):83-6. PubMed ID: 17040614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The round window: is it the "cochleostomy" of choice? Experience in 130 consecutive cochlear implants.
    Gudis DA; Montes M; Bigelow DC; Ruckenstein MJ
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Dec; 33(9):1497-501. PubMed ID: 22972422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Cochlear implantation in patients with inner ear malformations, clinical analysis of 25 cases].
    Zhao XT; Han DM; Li YX; Kong Y; Zheng J; Chen XQ; Liu B; Liu S; Mo LY
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2003 Jan; 83(2):103-5. PubMed ID: 12812675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults.
    Laske RD; Veraguth D; Dillier N; Binkert A; Holzmann D; Huber AM
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 19318885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Central effects of residual hearing: implications for choice of ear for cochlear implantation.
    Francis HW; Yeagle JD; Brightwell T; Venick H
    Laryngoscope; 2004 Oct; 114(10):1747-52. PubMed ID: 15454765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Multichannel cochlear implantation in the scala vestibuli.
    Lin K; Marrinan MS; Waltzman SB; Roland JT
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Aug; 27(5):634-8. PubMed ID: 16788421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Radical cavities and cochlear implantation.
    Hamzavi J; Baumgartner W; Franz P; Plenk H
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2001 Jul; 121(5):607-9. PubMed ID: 11583394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. 1-year postactivation results for sequentially implanted bilateral cochlear implant users.
    Wolfe J; Baker S; Caraway T; Kasulis H; Mears A; Smith J; Swim L; Wood M
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):589-96. PubMed ID: 17667768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Surgical results of cochlear implantation in malformed cochlea.
    Sennaroglu L; Sarac S; Ergin T
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Aug; 27(5):615-23. PubMed ID: 16788416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The influence of a cochlear implant electrode on the mechanical function of the inner ear.
    Huber AM; Hoon SJ; Sharouz B; Daniel B; Albrecht E
    Otol Neurotol; 2010 Apr; 31(3):512-8. PubMed ID: 20061991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Audiological outcome of the pull-back technique in cochlear implantees.
    Basta D; Todt I; Ernst A
    Laryngoscope; 2010 Jul; 120(7):1391-6. PubMed ID: 20564720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluation of a novel, noninvasive, objective test of auditory nerve function in cochlear implant candidates.
    Gräbel S; Hirschfelder A; Scheiber C; Olze H
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Sep; 30(6):716-24. PubMed ID: 19704358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Cochlear implantation via the round window membrane minimizes trauma to cochlear structures: a histologically controlled insertion study.
    Adunka O; Unkelbach MH; Mack M; Hambek M; Gstoettner W; Kiefer J
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2004 Sep; 124(7):807-12. PubMed ID: 15370564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effect of cochlear implant electrode insertion on middle-ear function as measured by intra-operative laser Doppler vibrometry.
    Donnelly N; Bibas A; Jiang D; Bamiou DE; Santulli C; Jeronimidis G; Fitzgerald O'Connor A
    J Laryngol Otol; 2009 Jul; 123(7):723-9. PubMed ID: 19138455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of round window and cochleostomy approaches with a prototype hearing preservation electrode.
    Briggs RJ; Tykocinski M; Xu J; Risi F; Svehla M; Cowan R; Stover T; Erfurt P; Lenarz T
    Audiol Neurootol; 2006; 11 Suppl 1():42-8. PubMed ID: 17063010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.