These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9833565)

  • 21. Assessing competency competently: toward a rational standard for competency-to-stand-trial assessments.
    Morris GH; Haroun AM; Naimark D
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2004; 32(3):231-45. PubMed ID: 15515910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A Proposed Model for Assessing Defendant Competence to Self-Represent.
    White MM; Gutheil TG
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2016 Dec; 44(4):425-436. PubMed ID: 28003386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Competence to proceed: a functional and context-determinative decision.
    Bennett GT; Sullwold AF
    J Forensic Sci; 1984 Oct; 29(4):1119-26. PubMed ID: 6502111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Competency to stand trial and the seriousness of the charge.
    Buchanan A
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2006; 34(4):458-65. PubMed ID: 17185474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Who is an expert? Competency evaluations in mental retardation and borderline intelligence.
    Siegert M; Weiss KJ
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2007; 35(3):346-9. PubMed ID: 17872557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Competency to stand trial: rationalism, "contextualism" and other modest theories.
    Jan Brakel S
    Behav Sci Law; 2003; 21(3):285-95. PubMed ID: 12808691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Competency restoration treatment: differences between defendants declared competent or incompetent to stand trial.
    Advokat CD; Guidry D; Burnett DM; Manguno-Mire G; Thompson JW
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2012; 40(1):89-97. PubMed ID: 22396346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Competency to stand trial and defendants who lack insight into their mental illness.
    Reisner AD; Piel J; Makey M
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2013; 41(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 23503181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Using Technology to Improve the Objectivity of Criminal Responsibility Evaluations.
    Vitacco MJ; Gottfried ED; Batastini AB
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2018 Mar; 46(1):71-77. PubMed ID: 29618538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Neuropsychological assessment of competency to stand trial evaluations: a practical conceptual model.
    Kirkish P; Sreenivasan S
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1999; 27(1):101-13. PubMed ID: 10212030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Quantifying the accuracy of forensic examiners in the absence of a "gold standard".
    Mossman D; Bowen MD; Vanness DJ; Bienenfeld D; Correll T; Kay J; Klykylo WM; Lehrer DS
    Law Hum Behav; 2010 Oct; 34(5):402-17. PubMed ID: 19771499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Depression in jailed women defendants and its relationship to their adjudicative competence.
    Redding RE
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1997; 25(1):105-19. PubMed ID: 9148887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Bridging the gap between conventional and standardized competency to stand trial (CST) assessments: An examination of defendant answers to conventional CST questions.
    Tarescavage AM; Luna Jones L; Lee TTC
    Law Hum Behav; 2017 Dec; 41(6):530-540. PubMed ID: 28857581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Five year research update (1991-1995): evaluations for competence to stand trial.
    Cooper DK; Grisso T
    Behav Sci Law; 1997; 15(3):347-64. PubMed ID: 9415961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Quality of criminal responsibility reports submitted to the Hawaii judiciary.
    Fuger KD; Acklin MW; Nguyen AH; Ignacio LA; Gowensmith WN
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2014; 37(3):272-80. PubMed ID: 24326082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Determination of Competency to Stand Trial (Fitness to Plead): An Exploratory Study in Hong Kong.
    Adjorlolo S; Chan HCO
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2017; 24(2):205-222. PubMed ID: 31983949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Opinion formation in evaluating sanity at the time of the offense: an examination of 5175 pre-trial evaluations.
    Warren JI; Murrie DC; Chauhan P; Dietz PE; Morris J
    Behav Sci Law; 2004; 22(2):171-86. PubMed ID: 15048857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Competency to Proceed to Trial Evaluations and Rational Understanding.
    Ragatz L; Vitacco MJ; Tross R
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2015 Dec; 59(14):1505-19. PubMed ID: 25080435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Competency to stand trial in family court: characteristics of competent and incompetent juveniles.
    McKee GR; Shea SJ
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1999; 27(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 10212027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Adjudicative competence.
    Dawes SE; Palmer BW; Jeste DV
    Curr Opin Psychiatry; 2008 Sep; 21(5):490-4. PubMed ID: 18650693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.