These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9833566)
1. Identification accuracy of children versus adults: a meta-analysis. Pozzulo JD; Lindsay RC Law Hum Behav; 1998 Oct; 22(5):549-70. PubMed ID: 9833566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Eyewitness identification across the life span: A meta-analysis of age differences. Fitzgerald RJ; Price HL Psychol Bull; 2015 Nov; 141(6):1228-65. PubMed ID: 26011788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Eyewitness accuracy rates in police showup and lineup presentations: a meta-analytic comparison. Steblay N; Dysart J; Fulero S; Lindsay RC Law Hum Behav; 2003 Oct; 27(5):523-40. PubMed ID: 14593796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Lineup identification by children: effects of clothing bias. Freire A; Lee K; Williamson KS; Stuart SJ; Lindsay RC Law Hum Behav; 2004 Jun; 28(3):339-54. PubMed ID: 15264450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Exploring the effects of age and delay on children's person identifications: verbal descriptions, lineup performance, and the influence of wildcards. Karageorge A; Zajac R Br J Psychol; 2011 May; 102(2):161-83. PubMed ID: 21492140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sequential lineup laps and eyewitness accuracy. Steblay NK; Dietrich HL; Ryan SL; Raczynski JL; James KA Law Hum Behav; 2011 Aug; 35(4):262-74. PubMed ID: 20632113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Children's identification of faces from lineups: the effects of lineup presentation and instructions on accuracy. Beresford J; Blades M J Appl Psychol; 2006 Sep; 91(5):1102-13. PubMed ID: 16953771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The information gained from witnesses' responses to an initial "blank" lineup. Palmer MA; Brewer N; Weber N Law Hum Behav; 2012 Oct; 36(5):439-47. PubMed ID: 22468758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Eyewitness accuracy rates in sequential and simultaneous lineup presentations: a meta-analytic comparison. Steblay N; Dysart J; Fulero S; Lindsay RC Law Hum Behav; 2001 Oct; 25(5):459-73. PubMed ID: 11688368 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The impact of eyewitness identifications from simultaneous and sequential lineups. Wright DB Memory; 2007 Oct; 15(7):746-54. PubMed ID: 17852725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Eyewitness confidence in simultaneous and sequential lineups: a criterion shift account for sequential mistaken identification overconfidence. Dobolyi DG; Dodson CS J Exp Psychol Appl; 2013 Dec; 19(4):345-57. PubMed ID: 24188335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Appearance-change instruction effects on eyewitness lineup identification accuracy are not moderated by amount of appearance change. Molinaro PF; Arndorfer A; Charman SD Law Hum Behav; 2013 Dec; 37(6):432-40. PubMed ID: 23855325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sequential lineup presentation promotes less-biased criterion setting but does not improve discriminability. Palmer MA; Brewer N Law Hum Behav; 2012 Jun; 36(3):247-55. PubMed ID: 22667814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Does filler database size influence identification accuracy? Bergold AN; Heaton P Law Hum Behav; 2018 Jun; 42(3):227-243. PubMed ID: 29809026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]