These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9835059)

  • 1. On the difference between strength-based and frequency-based mirror effects in recognition memory.
    Stretch V; Wixted JT
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1998 Nov; 24(6):1379-96. PubMed ID: 9835059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A bias in favor of the positive response to high-frequency words in recognition memory.
    Hoshino Y
    Mem Cognit; 1991 Nov; 19(6):607-16. PubMed ID: 1758305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On the nature of the decision axis in signal-detection-based models of recognition memory.
    Morrell HE; Gaitan S; Wixted JT
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Nov; 28(6):1095-110. PubMed ID: 12450335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Decision processes in recognition memory: criterion shifts and the list-strength paradigm.
    Hirshman E
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1995 Mar; 21(2):302-13. PubMed ID: 7738502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The word frequency effect in recognition memory versus repetition priming.
    Kinoshita S
    Mem Cognit; 1995 Sep; 23(5):569-80. PubMed ID: 7476243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Not all sources of familiarity are created equal: the case of word frequency and repetition in episodic recognition.
    Coane JH; Balota DA; Dolan PO; Jacoby LL
    Mem Cognit; 2011 Jul; 39(5):791-805. PubMed ID: 21264634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Strength-based criterion shifts in recognition memory.
    Singer M
    Mem Cognit; 2009 Oct; 37(7):976-84. PubMed ID: 19744937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Shades of the mirror effect: recognition of faces with and without sunglasses.
    Hockley WE; Hemsworth DH; Consoli A
    Mem Cognit; 1999 Jan; 27(1):128-38. PubMed ID: 10087862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Subjective memorability and the mirror effect.
    Wixted JT
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1992 Jul; 18(4):681-90. PubMed ID: 1385609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Global subjective memorability and the strength-based mirror effect in recognition memory.
    Bruno D; Higham PA; Perfect TJ
    Mem Cognit; 2009 Sep; 37(6):807-18. PubMed ID: 19679860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. fMRI evidence of word frequency and strength effects in recognition memory.
    de Zubicaray GI; McMahon KL; Eastburn MM; Finnigan S; Humphreys MS
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Aug; 24(3):587-98. PubMed ID: 16099368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Repetition effects in associative false recognition: Theme-based criterion shifts are the exception, not the rule.
    Starns JJ; Hicks JL; Marsh RL
    Memory; 2006 Aug; 14(6):742-61. PubMed ID: 16829490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The variance theory of the mirror effect in recognition memory.
    Sikström S
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2001 Sep; 8(3):408-38. PubMed ID: 11700894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Word frequency and list composition effects in associative recognition and recall.
    Clark SE; Burchett RE
    Mem Cognit; 1994 Jan; 22(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 8035685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A reexamination of stimulus-frequency effects in recognition: two mirrors for low- and high-frequency pseudowords.
    Reder LM; Angstadt P; Cary M; Erickson MA; Ayers MS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Jan; 28(1):138-52. PubMed ID: 11827076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using overt rehearsals to explain word frequency effects in free recall.
    Ward G; Woodward G; Stevens A; Stinson C
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Mar; 29(2):186-210. PubMed ID: 12696809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A mechanistic account of the mirror effect for word frequency: a computational model of remember-know judgments in a continuous recognition paradigm.
    Reder LM; Nhouyvanisvong A; Schunn CD; Ayers MS; Angstadt P; Hiraki K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2000 Mar; 26(2):294-320. PubMed ID: 10764098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Encoding, repetition, and the mirror effect in recognition memory: symmetry in motion.
    Hilford A; Glanzer M; Kim K
    Mem Cognit; 1997 Sep; 25(5):593-605. PubMed ID: 9337579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Blocking by word frequency and neighborhood density in visual word recognition: a task-specific response criteria account.
    Perea M; Carreiras M; Grainger J
    Mem Cognit; 2004 Oct; 32(7):1090-102. PubMed ID: 15813492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dissociating the influence of familiarity and meaningfulness from word frequency in naming and lexical decision performance.
    Colombo L; Pasini M; Balota DA
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Sep; 34(6):1312-24. PubMed ID: 17225511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.