These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9835248)
1. Patient satisfaction with clinical trial participation. Verheggen FW; Nieman FH; Reerink E; Kok GJ Int J Qual Health Care; 1998 Aug; 10(4):319-30. PubMed ID: 9835248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Patient experiences in retinal trials: a cross-sectional study. Au CP; Fardell N; Williams M; Fraser-Bell S; Campain A; Gillies M BMC Ophthalmol; 2015 Jul; 15():80. PubMed ID: 26202164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Understanding the decisions of cancer clinical trial participants to enter research studies: factors associated with informed consent, patient satisfaction, and decisional regret. Stryker JE; Wray RJ; Emmons KM; Winer E; Demetri G Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Oct; 63(1-2):104-9. PubMed ID: 16242898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Determinants of patient participation in clinical studies requiring informed consent: why patients enter a clinical trial. Verheggen FW; Nieman F; Jonkers R Patient Educ Couns; 1998 Oct; 35(2):111-25. PubMed ID: 10026554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ethical aspects of clinical trials: the attitudes of participants in two non-cancer trials. Madsen SM; Holm S; Davidsen B; Munkholm P; Schlichting P; Riis P J Intern Med; 2000 Dec; 248(6):463-74. PubMed ID: 11155139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The views of patients and healthy volunteers on participation in clinical trials: an exploratory survey study. Chu SH; Jeong SH; Kim EJ; Park MS; Park K; Nam M; Shim JY; Yoon YR Contemp Clin Trials; 2012 Jul; 33(4):611-9. PubMed ID: 22405971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparing Patients' Opinions on the Hospital Discharge Process Collected With a Self-Reported Questionnaire Completed Via the Internet or Through a Telephone Survey: An Ancillary Study of the SENTIPAT Randomized Controlled Trial. Couturier B; Carrat F; Hejblum G; J Med Internet Res; 2015 Jun; 17(6):e158. PubMed ID: 26109261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Consent for Anesthesia Clinical Trials on the Day of Surgery: Patient Attitudes and Perceptions. Murphy GS; Szokol JW; Avram MJ; Greenberg SB; Shear TD; Vender JS; Landry E Anesthesiology; 2016 Jun; 124(6):1246-55. PubMed ID: 27015153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Determinants of informed consent in a cataract surgery clinical trial: why patients participate. Constantinou M; Jhanji V; Chiang PP; Lamoureux EL; Rees G; Vajpayee RB Can J Ophthalmol; 2012 Apr; 47(2):118-23. PubMed ID: 22560415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Are subjects satisfied with the informed consent process? A survey of research participants. Pope JE; Tingey DP; Arnold JM; Hong P; Ouimet JM; Krizova A J Rheumatol; 2003 Apr; 30(4):815-24. PubMed ID: 12672205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Appreciation of the informed consent procedure in a randomised trial of decompressive surgery for space occupying hemispheric infarction. Hofmeijer J; Amelink GJ; den Hertog HM; Algra A; Kappelle LJ; van der Worp HB; ; J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 2007 Oct; 78(10):1124-8. PubMed ID: 17400593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cross-sectional assessment of patient attitudes towards participation in clinical trials: does making results publicly available matter? Jones CW; Braz VA; McBride SM; Roberts BW; Platts-Mills TF BMJ Open; 2016 Nov; 6(11):e013649. PubMed ID: 27884854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An evaluation of the QSP and the QPP: two methods for measuring patient satisfaction. Nathorst-Böös J; Munck IM; Eckerlund I; Ekfeldt-Sandberg C Int J Qual Health Care; 2001 Jun; 13(3):257-64. PubMed ID: 11476150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Patients' perceptions of physicians communication and outcomes of the accrual to trial process. Grant CH; Cissna KN; Rosenfeld LB Health Commun; 2000; 12(1):23-39. PubMed ID: 10938905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Study of cohort-specific consent and patient control in phase I cancer trials. Daugherty CK; Ratain MJ; Minami H; Banik DM; Vogelzang NJ; Stadler WM; Siegler M J Clin Oncol; 1998 Jul; 16(7):2305-12. PubMed ID: 9667244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Trial participation and vaccine desirability for Vi polysaccharide typhoid fever vaccine in Hue City, Viet Nam. Kaljee LM; Pham V; Son ND; Hoa NT; Thiem VD; Canh DG; Thoa le TK; Ali M; Ochiai RL; Danovaro-Holliday MC; Acosta CJ; Stanton B; Clemens J Trop Med Int Health; 2007 Jan; 12(1):25-36. PubMed ID: 17207145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pre-notification letter type and response rate to a postal survey among women who have recently given birth. Todd AL; Porter M; Williamson JL; Patterson JA; Roberts CL BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Dec; 15():104. PubMed ID: 26621534 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Parallel multicentre randomised trial of a clinical trial question prompt list in patients considering participation in phase 3 cancer treatment trials. Tattersall MH; Jefford M; Martin A; Olver I; Thompson JF; Brown RF; Butow PN BMJ Open; 2017 Mar; 7(3):e012666. PubMed ID: 28249847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is patient satisfaction with organizational aspects of their general practitioner's practice associated with patient and doctor gender? An observational study. Sebo P; Herrmann FR; Haller DM BMC Fam Pract; 2016 Aug; 17(1):120. PubMed ID: 27729018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quality of care in the intensive care unit from the perspective of patient's relatives: development and psychometric evaluation of the consumer quality index 'R-ICU'. Rensen A; van Mol MM; Menheere I; Nijkamp MD; Verhoogt E; Maris B; Manders W; Vloet L; Verharen L BMC Health Serv Res; 2017 Jan; 17(1):77. PubMed ID: 28118840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]