These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9835663)

  • 41. Feigning combat-related posttraumatic stress disorder on the personality assessment inventory.
    Calhoun PS; Earnst KS; Tucker DD; Kirby AC; Beckham JC
    J Pers Assess; 2000 Oct; 75(2):338-50. PubMed ID: 11020148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. An investigation of the ECST-R in male pretrial patients: evaluating the effects of feigning on competency evaluations.
    Vitacco MJ; Rogers R; Gabel J
    Assessment; 2009 Sep; 16(3):249-57. PubMed ID: 19779096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. A pilot study on the Chinese Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 in detecting feigned mental disorders: Simulators classified by using the Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms.
    Chang YT; Tam WC; Shiah YJ; Chiang SK
    Psych J; 2017 Sep; 6(3):175-184. PubMed ID: 28613018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Does the disorder matter? Investigating a moderating effect on coached noncredible overreporting using the MMPI-2 and PAI.
    Veltri CO; Williams JE
    Assessment; 2013 Apr; 20(2):199-209. PubMed ID: 23118265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Effect of symptom information and intelligence in dissimulation: an examination of faking response styles by inmates on the Basic Personality Inventory.
    Steffan JS; Kroner DG; Morgan RD
    Assessment; 2007 Mar; 14(1):22-34. PubMed ID: 17314177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. New and improved? A comparison of the original and revised versions of the structured interview of reported symptoms.
    Green D; Rosenfeld B; Belfi B
    Assessment; 2013 Apr; 20(2):210-8. PubMed ID: 23242218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Detection of Feigning of Different Symptom Presentations With the PAI and IOP-29.
    Pignolo C; Giromini L; Ales F; Zennaro A
    Assessment; 2023 Apr; 30(3):565-579. PubMed ID: 34872384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Operating characteristics of six response distortion indicators for the personality assessment inventory.
    Morey LC; Lanier VW
    Assessment; 1998 Sep; 5(3):203-14. PubMed ID: 9728028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Clinical and conceptual problems in the attribution of malingering in forensic evaluations.
    Drob SL; Meehan KB; Waxman SE
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2009; 37(1):98-106. PubMed ID: 19297641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Rule-Out and Rule-In scales for the M test for malingering: a cross-validation.
    Smith GP; Borum R; Schinka JA
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1993; 21(1):107-10. PubMed ID: 8477101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Malingering on the Personality Assessment Inventory: identification of specific feigned disorders.
    Hopwood CJ; Morey LC; Rogers R; Sewell K
    J Pers Assess; 2007 Feb; 88(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 17266413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Utility of the Personality Assessment Inventory for Detecting Malingered ADHD in College Students.
    Musso MW; Hill BD; Barker AA; Pella RD; Gouvier WD
    J Atten Disord; 2016 Sep; 20(9):763-74. PubMed ID: 25204276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Likelihood of obtaining Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms (SIRS) and SIRS-2 elevations among forensic psychiatric inpatients with screening elevations on the Miller Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test.
    Glassmire DM; Tarescavage AM; Gottfried ED
    Psychol Assess; 2016 Dec; 28(12):1586-1596. PubMed ID: 27046275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Use of the SIRS in compensation cases: an examination of its validity and generalizability.
    Rogers R; Payne JW; Berry DT; Granacher RP
    Law Hum Behav; 2009 Jun; 33(3):213-24. PubMed ID: 18679780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Validity of the Miller forensic assessment of symptoms test in psychiatric inpatients.
    Veazey CH; Wagner AL; Hays JR; Miller HA
    Psychol Rep; 2005 Jun; 96(3 Pt 1):771-4. PubMed ID: 16050637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. A validation of the test of memory malingering in a forensic psychiatric setting.
    Weinborn M; Orr T; Woods SP; Conover E; Feix J
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2003 Oct; 25(7):979-90. PubMed ID: 13680444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Are exaggerated health complaints continuous or categorical? A taxometric analysis of the Health Problem Overstatement Scale.
    Walters GD; Berry DT; Lanyon RI; Murphy MP
    Psychol Assess; 2009 Jun; 21(2):219-26. PubMed ID: 19485676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The utility of the MMPI-2 malingering discriminant function index in the detection of malingering: a study of criminal defendants.
    Toomey JA; Kucharski LT; Duncan S
    Assessment; 2009 Mar; 16(1):115-21. PubMed ID: 18607009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Differentiating genuine from feigned suicidality in corrections: A necessary but perilous task.
    Obegi JH
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2020; 71():101573. PubMed ID: 32768118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Deceptiveness on the PAI: a study of naïve faking with psychiatric inpatients.
    Baity MR; Siefert CJ; Chambers A; Blais MA
    J Pers Assess; 2007 Feb; 88(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 17266410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.