These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

73 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9835735)

  • 1. [Correlation between malfunction of a bioprosthesis and deformation of a valve stent. Comparison of three different vale models].
    Actis Dato GM; Caimmi P; Di Rosa E; Deorsola L; Aidala E; Punta G; Poletti G; Di Summa M
    Minerva Cardioangiol; 1998 Apr; 46(4):97-101. PubMed ID: 9835735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Clinical study of "stent creep" in porcine bioprosthesis].
    Akiyama K; Sawatani O; Imamura E; Endo M; Hashimoto A; Koyanagi H
    Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 1988 May; 89(5):747-51. PubMed ID: 3412306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A 10-year comparison of explanted Hancock-II and Carpentier-Edwards supraannular bioprostheses.
    Butany J; Leong SW; Cunningham KS; D'Cruz G; Carmichael K; Yau TM
    Cardiovasc Pathol; 2007; 16(1):4-13. PubMed ID: 17218209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Eighteen-year follow up after Hancock II bioprosthesis insertion.
    Legarra JJ; Llorens R; Catalan M; Segura I; Trenor AM; de Buruaga JS; Rabago G; Sarralde A
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Jan; 8(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 10096477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Morphologic findings in explanted Hancock II porcine bioprostheses.
    Butany J; Yu W; Silver MD; David TE
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Jan; 8(1):4-15. PubMed ID: 10096476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Tricuspid valve replacement: bioprostheses are preferable.
    Dalrymple-Hay MJ; Leung Y; Ohri SK; Haw MP; Ross JK; Livesey SA; Monro JL
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Nov; 8(6):644-8. PubMed ID: 10616242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of patient-prosthesis mismatch on long-term results after aortic valve replacement with a stented bioprosthesis.
    Frapier JM; Rouvière P; Razcka F; Aymard T; Albat B; Chaptal PA
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 Jul; 11(4):543-51. PubMed ID: 12150304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [A case report: Carpentier-Edwards porcine bioprosthesis malfunction due to the stent dehiscence at 17 years after the implantation in the mitral position].
    Hayashi K; Nakano H; Sakamoto T; Okamura H
    Kyobu Geka; 2000 Jan; 53(1):79-82. PubMed ID: 10639799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Tears in bioprosthetic heart valve leaflets without calcific degeneration.
    Haziza F; Papouin G; Barratt-Boyes B; Christie G; Whitlock R
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1996 Jan; 5(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 8834723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Long-term results with the Xenomedica porcine bioprosthesis in the mitral position.
    Santini F; Auriemma S; Casali G; Rossi A; Lusini M; Mazzucco A
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 Nov; 10(6):789-94. PubMed ID: 11767188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mitral valve disease: if the mitral valve is not reparable/failed repair, is bioprosthesis suitable for replacement?
    Jamieson WR; Gudas VM; Burr LH; Janusz MT; Fradet GJ; Ling H; Germann E; Lichtenstein SV
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2009 Jan; 35(1):104-10. PubMed ID: 19056294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prevention of thromboembolism with ticlopidine shortly after valve repair or replacement with a bioprosthesis.
    Aramendi JL; Agredo J; Llorente A; Larrarte C; Pijoan J
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 Nov; 7(6):610-4. PubMed ID: 9870193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Durability of pericardial versus porcine aortic valves.
    Gao G; Wu Y; Grunkemeier GL; Furnary AP; Starr A
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2004 Jul; 44(2):384-8. PubMed ID: 15261935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mitroflow pericardial valve prosthesis in the aortic position: an analysis of long-term outcome and prognostic factors.
    Minami K; Boethig D; Mirow N; Kleikamp G; Koertke H; Godehardt E; Koerfer R
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 Jan; 9(1):112-22. PubMed ID: 10678383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Performance of the Carpentier-Edwards SAV and Hancock-II porcine bioprostheses in aortic valve replacement.
    Jamieson WR; David TE; Feindel CM; Miyagishima RT; Germann E
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 May; 11(3):424-30. PubMed ID: 12056738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Aortic valve replacement with the Sorin Pericarbon Freedom stentless valve: five-year follow up.
    Nyawo B; Graham R; Hunter S
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2007 Jan; 16(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 17315382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Late incidence and determinants of reoperation in patients with prosthetic heart valves.
    Ruel M; Kulik A; Rubens FD; Bédard P; Masters RG; Pipe AL; Mesana TG
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2004 Mar; 25(3):364-70. PubMed ID: 15019662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biological versus mechanical aortic prosthesis? A nineteen-year comparison in a propensity-matched population.
    Bottio T; Rizzoli G; Caprili L; Testolin L; Thiene G; Gerosa G
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Jul; 14(4):493-500. PubMed ID: 16116876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mechanical versus bioprosthetic valve replacement in middle-aged patients.
    Kulik A; Bédard P; Lam BK; Rubens FD; Hendry PJ; Masters RG; Mesana TG; Ruel M
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2006 Sep; 30(3):485-91. PubMed ID: 16857373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Late incidence and predictors of persistent or recurrent heart failure in patients with aortic prosthetic valves.
    Ruel M; Rubens FD; Masters RG; Pipe AL; Bédard P; Hendry PJ; Lam BK; Burwash IG; Goldstein WG; Brais MP; Keon WJ; Mesana TG
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2004 Jan; 127(1):149-59. PubMed ID: 14752425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.