These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9835827)

  • 1. A new in vitro method for testing the interproximal cleaning potential of toothbrushing.
    Bruun C; Ekstrand KR; Andreasen KB
    J Clin Dent; 1998; 9(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 9835827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Laboratory evaluations of elmex inter X toothbrushes for interproximal access efficacy and posterior tooth surface cleaning.
    Yankell SL; Shi X; Emling RC
    J Clin Dent; 2002; 13(6):249-52. PubMed ID: 12518499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Laboratory interproximal access efficacy comparison of a rippled bristles toothbrush and a flat manual toothbrush.
    Yankell SL; Shi X; Emling RC
    J Clin Dent; 1993; 4(3):82-4. PubMed ID: 8003238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Development and laboratory evaluation of a new toothbrush with a novel brush head design.
    Beals D; Ngo T; Feng Y; Cook D; Grau DG; Weber DA
    Am J Dent; 2000 Mar; 13(Spec No):5A-14A. PubMed ID: 11763943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative laboratory evaluation of two new toothbrushes regarding interproximal access efficacy.
    Yankell SL; Shi X; Emling RC
    J Clin Dent; 1993; 4 Suppl D():D1-4. PubMed ID: 8397835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparative evaluation of the in vitro penetration performance of the improved Crest complete toothbrush versus the Current Crest complete toothbrush, the Colgate Precision toothbrush and the Oral-B P40 toothbrush.
    Volpenhein DW; Handel SE; Hughes TJ; Wild J
    J Clin Dent; 1996; 7(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 9238881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Laboratory evaluations of toothbrush interproximal penetration ratios.
    Yost KG; Miluszewski KF; Chen AC
    J Clin Dent; 1994; 4(4):125-7. PubMed ID: 8031481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparative evaluation of the in vitro penetration performance of the improved Crest Complete toothbrush versus the Colgate Total toothbrush and the Oral-B Advantage toothbrush.
    Volpenhein DW; Hartman WL
    J Clin Dent; 1996; 7(4):101-5. PubMed ID: 9238886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative laboratory evaluation of three toothbrushes regarding interproximal access efficacy.
    Yankell SL; Shi X; Emling RC
    J Clin Dent; 1992; 3(Suppl C):C5-8. PubMed ID: 1306675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of tapered-end toothbrushes regarding subgingival access efficacy.
    Hotta M; Yoshida T; Sekine I; Imada S; Sano A
    J Clin Dent; 1997; 8(6):156-8. PubMed ID: 9586531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Laboratory interproximal access efficacy of two compact manual toothbrushes.
    Yankell SL; Shi X; Emling RC
    J Clin Dent; 1994; 4(4):111-3. PubMed ID: 8031478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Laboratory evaluations of interproximal access of two differently bristled manual toothbrushes.
    Battista GW; Petrone DM
    J Clin Dent; 1993; 4(3):85-7. PubMed ID: 8003239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Correlations between two plaque indices in assessment of toothbrush effectiveness.
    Cugini M; Thompson M; Warren PR
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Nov; 7(5):1-9. PubMed ID: 17091134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of the laboratory interproximal access efficacy of the Colgate precision toothbrush and the Crest complete toothbrush.
    Battista GW; Petrone DM
    J Clin Dent; 1993; 4 Suppl D():D5-7. PubMed ID: 8397838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The relative cleaning effectiveness of manual and powered toothbrushes.
    Hunt SA
    J Clin Dent; 2002; 13(5):211-4. PubMed ID: 12518492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative efficacy of two battery-powered toothbrushes on dental plaque removal.
    Ruhlman CD; Bartizek RD; Biesbrock AR
    J Clin Dent; 2002; 13(3):95-9. PubMed ID: 11887517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative study of plaque removal efficacy of twin-motor sonic toothbrush with floating bristles and conventional powered toothbrushes in posterior teeth.
    Hanato Y; Kishimoto T; Ojima M; Matsuo T; Kanesaki N; Ryu C; Hanioka T
    Am J Dent; 2005 Aug; 18(4):237-40. PubMed ID: 16296429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A new method for in vitro evaluation of the interproximal penetration of manual toothbrushes.
    Volpenhein DW; Walsh ME; Dellerman PA; Burkett TA
    J Clin Dent; 1994; 5(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 8031486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Three laboratory assessments of a new triple-head toothbrush and the Oral-B 40 toothbrush.
    Emling RC; Yankell SL; Shi X; Smith JC
    J Clin Dent; 2005; 16(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 15974217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Laboratory evaluations of two toothbrushes for removal of artificial plaque above, around and below the gingival margin.
    Yankell SL; Shi X; Emling RC
    J Clin Dent; 2003; 14(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 12619266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.