144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9835836)
1. Effect of implant number on transverse bending moments during simulated unilateral loading of mandibular fixed-detachable prostheses.
Korioth TW; Chew CB; Chung DH
J Oral Implantol; 1998; 24(2):93-6. PubMed ID: 9835836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of implant number, distribution and prosthesis material on loading on implants supporting fixed prostheses.
Ogawa T; Dhaliwal S; Naert I; Mine A; Kronstrom M; Sasaki K; Duyck J
J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Jul; 37(7):525-31. PubMed ID: 20236236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In vitro study of the influence of the type of connection on the fracture load of zirconia abutments with internal and external implant-abutment connections.
Sailer I; Sailer T; Stawarczyk B; Jung RE; Hämmerle CH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):850-8. PubMed ID: 19865625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Functional loads on freestanding and connected implants in three-unit mandibular prostheses opposing complete dentures: an in vivo study.
Gunne J; Rangert B; Glantz PO; Svensson A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(3):335-41. PubMed ID: 9197098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pre-load on oral implants after screw tightening fixed full prostheses: an in vivo study.
Duyck J; Van Oosterwyck H; Vander Sloten J; De Cooman M; Puers R; Naert I
J Oral Rehabil; 2001 Mar; 28(3):226-33. PubMed ID: 11350577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. On the role of number of fixtures, surgical technique and timing of loading.
Eliasson A
Swed Dent J Suppl; 2008; (197):3-95. PubMed ID: 18652085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical comparison of axial and tilted implants for mandibular full-arch fixed prostheses.
Kim KS; Kim YL; Bae JM; Cho HW
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):976-84. PubMed ID: 22010079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of tilted and short distal implants on axial forces and bending moments in implants supporting fixed dental prostheses: an in vitro study.
Ogawa T; Dhaliwal S; Naert I; Mine A; Kronstrom M; Sasaki K; Duyck J
Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(6):566-73. PubMed ID: 21209995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In vivo forces on implants influenced by occlusal scheme and food consistency.
Morneburg TR; Pröschel PA
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(5):481-6. PubMed ID: 14651231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In vivo comparison of force development with various materials of implant-supported prostheses.
Kim HK; Heo SJ; Koak JY; Kim SK
J Oral Rehabil; 2009 Aug; 36(8):616-25. PubMed ID: 19548956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Finite element stress analysis of the influence of staggered versus straight placement of dental implants.
Akça K; Iplikçioğlu H
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(5):722-30. PubMed ID: 11669255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of load distribution for implant overdenture attachments.
Porter JA; Petropoulos VC; Brunski JB
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(5):651-62. PubMed ID: 12381065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. On occlusal forces in dentitions with implant-supported fixed cantilever prostheses.
Falk H
Swed Dent J Suppl; 1990; 69():1-40. PubMed ID: 2196708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cyclic loading of implant-supported prostheses: changes in component fit over time.
Hecker DM; Eckert SE
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Apr; 89(4):346-51. PubMed ID: 12690346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Removable dentures with implant support in strategic positions followed for up to 8 years.
Kaufmann R; Friedli M; Hug S; Mericske-Stern R
Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(3):233-41; discussion 242. PubMed ID: 19548404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of implant framework and mandibular flexure on the strain distribution on a Kennedy class II mandible restored with a long-span implant fixed restoration: a pilot study.
Law C; Bennani V; Lyons K; Swain M
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Jul; 112(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 24388719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of abutment's height and framework alloy on the load distribution of mandibular cantilevered implant-supported prosthesis.
Suedam V; Souza EA; Moura MS; Jacques LB; Rubo JH
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Feb; 20(2):196-200. PubMed ID: 19191796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Load fatigue performance of implant-ceramic abutment combinations.
Nguyen HQ; Tan KB; Nicholls JI
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):636-46. PubMed ID: 19885403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Telescopic magnetic attachment for implant-supported denture: evaluation of splint effect.
Chen J; Tomotake Y; Watanabe M; Ishida Y; Nagao K; Ichikawa T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):657-64. PubMed ID: 21691614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of superstructure type and design on force transmission via implant-stabilised mandibular prostheses.
el-Sheikh AM; Hobkirk JA; Kelleway JP
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1999; 7(2):45-50. PubMed ID: 10865379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
