These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
387 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9835838)
21. Comparison of prefabricated and custom-made bars used for implant-retained mandibular complete overdentures. Abd El-Dayem MA; Assad AS; Eldin Sanad ME; Mahmoud Mogahed SA Implant Dent; 2009 Dec; 18(6):501-11. PubMed ID: 20009604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Tooth- and implant-supported prostheses: a retrospective clinical follow-up up to 8 years. Kindberg H; Gunne J; Kronström M Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(6):575-81. PubMed ID: 12066706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Implant treatment in edentulous maxillae: a 5-year follow-up report on patients with different degrees of jaw resorption. Jemt T; Lekholm U Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1995; 10(3):303-11. PubMed ID: 7615326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Five-year study of implant placement in regenerated bone and rehabilitation with telescopic crown retained dentures: a case report. Zafiropoulos GG; Hoffmann O J Oral Implantol; 2009; 35(6):303-9. PubMed ID: 20017648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Retrospective evaluation of complete-arch fixed partial dentures connecting teeth and implant abutments in patients with normal and reduced periodontal support. Cordaro L; Ercoli C; Rossini C; Torsello F; Feng C J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):313-20. PubMed ID: 16198167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Survival analysis and clinical evaluation of implant-retained prostheses in oral cancer resection patients over a mean follow-up period of 10 years. Nelson K; Heberer S; Glatzer C J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Nov; 98(5):405-10. PubMed ID: 18021829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Implant-retained maxillary overdentures on milled bar suprastructures: a 10-year follow-up of surgical and prosthetic care and aftercare. Visser A; Raghoebar GM; Meijer HJ; Vissink A Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(2):181-92. PubMed ID: 19418867 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A 10-year randomized clinical trial on the influence of splinted and unsplinted oral implants retaining mandibular overdentures: peri-implant outcome. Naert I; Alsaadi G; van Steenberghe D; Quirynen M Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(5):695-702. PubMed ID: 15508985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Removable dentures with implant support in strategic positions followed for up to 8 years. Kaufmann R; Friedli M; Hug S; Mericske-Stern R Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(3):233-41; discussion 242. PubMed ID: 19548404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Implant prosthodontic rehabilitation of patients with rheumatic disorders: a case series report. Weinlander M; Krennmair G; Piehslinger E Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 20234887 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Outcome of Brånemark Novum implant treatment in edentulous mandibles: a retrospective 5-year follow-up study. Gualini F; Gualini G; Cominelli R; Lekholm U Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Dec; 11(4):330-7. PubMed ID: 18783416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Removable four implant-supported mandibular overdentures rigidly retained with telescopic crowns or milled bars: a 3-year prospective study. Krennmair G; Sütö D; Seemann R; Piehslinger E Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Apr; 23(4):481-8. PubMed ID: 21504478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Clinical evaluation of mandibular overdentures supported by multiple-bar fabrication: a follow-up study of two implant systems. Versteegh PA; van Beek GJ; Slagter AP; Ottervanger JP Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1995; 10(5):595-603. PubMed ID: 7591005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The symphyseal single-tooth implant for anchorage of a mandibular complete denture in geriatric patients: a clinical report. Krennmair G; Ulm C Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(1):98-104. PubMed ID: 11280368 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Restoration with implants in patients with recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa and patient satisfaction with the implant-supported superstructure. Peñarrocha M; Larrazábal C; Balaguer J; Serrano C; Silvestre J; Bagán JV Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(4):651-5. PubMed ID: 17929528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Long-term, retrospective evaluation (implant and patient-centred outcome) of the two-implants-supported overdenture in the mandible. Part 1: survival rate. Vercruyssen M; Marcelis K; Coucke W; Naert I; Quirynen M Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Apr; 21(4):357-65. PubMed ID: 20105198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Within-subject comparison between connected and nonconnected tooth-to-implant fixed partial prostheses: up to 14-year follow-up study. Hosny M; Duyck J; van Steenberghe D; Naert I Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(4):340-6. PubMed ID: 11203652 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Outcome of treatment of implant-retained overdenture in patients with extreme mandibular bone resorption treated with bone grafts using a modified tent pole technique. Kuoppala R; Kainulainen VT; Korpi JT; Sándor GK; Oikarinen KS; Raustia A J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Nov; 71(11):1843-51. PubMed ID: 23953628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Marginal bone loss and prosthetic maintenance of bar-retained implant-supported overdentures: a prospective study. Akca K; Cehreli MC; Uysal S Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(1):137-45. PubMed ID: 20209196 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with ball or bar attachments: a randomized prospective 5-year study. Gotfredsen K; Holm B Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(2):125-30. PubMed ID: 11203620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]