338 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9835991)
1. [Principles of tests of hypotheses in statistics: alpha, beta and P].
Riou B; Landais P
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim; 1998; 17(9):1168-80. PubMed ID: 9835991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Hypothesis testing.
Yarandi HN
Clin Nurse Spec; 1996 Jul; 10(4):186-8. PubMed ID: 8900794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Inappropriate use of statistical power.
Fraser RA
Bone Marrow Transplant; 2023 May; 58(5):474-477. PubMed ID: 36869191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Statistics in ophthalmology revisited: the (effect) size matters.
Grzybowski A; Mianowany M
Acta Ophthalmol; 2018 Nov; 96(7):e885-e888. PubMed ID: 30187631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Significance, Errors, Power, and Sample Size: The Blocking and Tackling of Statistics.
Mascha EJ; Vetter TR
Anesth Analg; 2018 Feb; 126(2):691-698. PubMed ID: 29346210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [How to assess the size of a clinical trial?].
Paesmans M
Rev Mal Respir; 1994; 11(6):547-57. PubMed ID: 7831504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Statistical reasoning in clinical trials: hypothesis testing.
Kelen GD; Brown CG; Ashton J
Am J Emerg Med; 1988 Jan; 6(1):52-61. PubMed ID: 3275456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Some consequences of using the Horsfall-Barratt scale for hypothesis testing.
Bock CH; Gottwald TR; Parker PE; Ferrandino F; Welham S; van den Bosch F; Parnell S
Phytopathology; 2010 Oct; 100(10):1030-41. PubMed ID: 20839938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Comparison of two or more samples of quantitative data].
Ivanković D; Tiljak MK
Acta Med Croatica; 2006; 60 Suppl 1():37-46. PubMed ID: 16526306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biostatistics Series Module 2: Overview of Hypothesis Testing.
Hazra A; Gogtay N
Indian J Dermatol; 2016; 61(2):137-45. PubMed ID: 27057011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Précis of statistical significance: rationale, validity, and utility.
Chow SL
Behav Brain Sci; 1998 Apr; 21(2):169-94; discussion 194-239. PubMed ID: 10097013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Basic statistics for clinicians: 1. Hypothesis testing.
Guyatt G; Jaeschke R; Heddle N; Cook D; Shannon H; Walter S
CMAJ; 1995 Jan; 152(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 7804919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Analysis of phase II clinical trials in haematology and oncology: comparison of the triangular test to the usual methods.
Benichou J; Bellissant E; Chastang C
Stat Med; 1991 Jun; 10(6):989; discussion 989-90. PubMed ID: 1876789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. What your statistician never told you about P-values.
Blume J; Peipert JF
J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc; 2003 Nov; 10(4):439-44. PubMed ID: 14738627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sample size estimation in single-arm clinical trials with multiple testing under frequentist and Bayesian approaches.
Zaslavsky BG; Scott J
J Biopharm Stat; 2012; 22(4):819-35. PubMed ID: 22651117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Relationship between sample size and the definition of equivalence in non-inferiority drug studies.
Millar JA; Burke V
J Clin Pharm Ther; 2002 Oct; 27(5):329-33. PubMed ID: 12383133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An optimal three-stage design for phase II clinical trials.
Ensign LG; Gehan EA; Kamen DS; Thall PF
Stat Med; 1994 Sep; 13(17):1727-36. PubMed ID: 7997706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Research Techniques Made Simple: Sample Size Estimation and Power Calculation.
Schmidt SAJ; Lo S; Hollestein LM
J Invest Dermatol; 2018 Aug; 138(8):1678-1682. PubMed ID: 30032783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. On the power of some binomial modifications of the Bonferroni multiple test.
Teriokhin AT; de Meeûs T; Guégan JF
Zh Obshch Biol; 2007; 68(5):332-40. PubMed ID: 18038646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
