These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9836562)

  • 1. Clinical experience with Dynaflex penile prostheses in 120 patients.
    Anafarta K; Yaman O; Aydos K
    Urology; 1998 Dec; 52(6):1098-100. PubMed ID: 9836562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Long-term followup of and patient satisfaction with the Dynaflex self-contained inflatable penile prosthesis.
    Kabalin JN; Kuo JC
    J Urol; 1997 Aug; 158(2):456-9. PubMed ID: 9224322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Our experience with the implant of single component integrated prostheses (Hydroflex-Dynaflex)].
    Rodríguez Tolrá J; Franco Miranda E; Arbelaez Arango S; Trilla Herrera E; Serrallach Milá N
    Actas Urol Esp; 2002 Apr; 26(4):261-5. PubMed ID: 12090183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Penile prosthetic surgery in neurologically impaired patients: long-term followup.
    Zermann DH; Kutzenberger J; Sauerwein D; Schubert J; Loeffler U
    J Urol; 2006 Mar; 175(3 Pt 1):1041-4; discussion 1044. PubMed ID: 16469612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Outcome of penile prosthesis implantation for treating erectile dysfunction: experience with 504 procedures.
    Minervini A; Ralph DJ; Pryor JP
    BJU Int; 2006 Jan; 97(1):129-33. PubMed ID: 16336342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Long-term results with Hydroflex and Dynaflex penile prostheses: device survival comparison to multicomponent inflatables.
    Wilson SK; Cleves M; Delk JR
    J Urol; 1996 May; 155(5):1621-3. PubMed ID: 8627837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Penile prosthetic implant in the treatment of impotence: our experience].
    Pereira Arias JG; Escobal Tamayo V; Maraña Fernandez MT; Astobieta Odriozola A; Bernuy Malfaz C
    Arch Esp Urol; 1994 Sep; 47(7):703-8. PubMed ID: 7802474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Long-term survival and patient satisfaction with inflatable penile prosthesis for the treatment of erectile dysfunction.
    Ji YS; Ko YH; Song PH; Moon KH
    Korean J Urol; 2015 Jun; 56(6):461-5. PubMed ID: 26078844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Contemporary aspects of penile prosthesis implantation.
    Montague DK; Angermeier KW
    Urol Int; 2003; 70(2):141-6. PubMed ID: 12592043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Efficacy and safety of malleable penile prosthesis compared to inflatable penile prosthesis in erectile dysfunction patients.
    Satwikananda H; Laksita TB; Djatisoesanto W; Soebadi DM
    Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2024 Jun; 96(2):12353. PubMed ID: 38934528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Updates in inflatable penile prostheses.
    Henry GD; Wilson SK
    Urol Clin North Am; 2007 Nov; 34(4):535-47, vi. PubMed ID: 17983893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Penile prostheses in paraplegic men.
    Gross AJ; Sauerwein DH; Kutzenberger J; Ringert RH
    Br J Urol; 1996 Aug; 78(2):262-4. PubMed ID: 8813925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Inflatable penile prosthesis: satisfaction rate, result, prognostic factors. Prospective study on 50 primooperated patients in CHU of Nice between 2000 and 2009].
    Obadia F; Mouracade P; Terrier JE; Amiel J; Gigante M; Li G; Chevallier D
    Prog Urol; 2013 Dec; 23(16):1419-27. PubMed ID: 24274947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ambicor Two-Piece Inflatable Penile Prosthesis: Background and Contemporary Outcomes.
    Ko OS; Bennett NE
    Sex Med Rev; 2018 Apr; 6(2):319-327. PubMed ID: 28874326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Long term patient satisfaction and quality of life with AMS700CX inflatable penile prosthesis.
    Vitarelli A; Divenuto L; Fortunato F; Falco A; Pagliarulo V; Antonini G; Gentile V; Sciarra A; Salciccia S; Sansalone S; Di Placido MR; Garaffa G; Pagliarulo A
    Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2013 Sep; 85(3):133-7. PubMed ID: 24085235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Outcome of penile prosthesis implantation: are malleable prostheses an appropriate treatment option in patients with erectile dysfunction caused by prior radical surgery?
    Sevinc C; Ozkaptan O; Balaban M; Yucetas U; Karadeniz T
    Asian J Androl; 2017; 19(4):477-481. PubMed ID: 27121195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical experience with inflatable and malleable penile implants in 104 patients.
    Anafarta K; Safak M; Bedük Y; Baltaci S; Aydos K
    Urol Int; 1996; 56(2):100-4. PubMed ID: 8659000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. 10 years of experience with penile prosthesis implantation in Taiwanese patients.
    Chiang HS; Wu CC; Wen TC
    J Urol; 2000 Feb; 163(2):476-80. PubMed ID: 10647659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Combined inflatable penile prosthesis-artificial urinary sphincter implantation: no increased risk of adverse events compared to single or staged device implantation.
    Segal RL; Cabrini MR; Harris ED; Mostwin JL; Bivalacqua TJ; Burnett AL
    J Urol; 2013 Dec; 190(6):2183-8. PubMed ID: 23831315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mechanical reliability of the AMS 700CXM inflatable penile prosthesis for the treatment of male erectile dysfunction.
    Deuk Choi Y; Jin Choi Y; Hwan Kim J; Ki Choi H
    J Urol; 2001 Mar; 165(3):822-4. PubMed ID: 11176478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.