These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9838139)

  • 1. Choice and stimulus-response compatibility affect duration of response selection.
    Dassonville P; Lewis SM; Foster HE; Ashe J
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 1999 Jan; 7(3):235-40. PubMed ID: 9838139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Emerging features of modality mappings in task switching: modality compatibility requires variability at the level of both stimulus and response modality.
    Fintor E; Stephan DN; Koch I
    Psychol Res; 2018 Jan; 82(1):121-133. PubMed ID: 28578525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of dimensional overlap on location-related priming in the Simon task.
    Lehle C; Stürmer B; Sommer W
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(12):2329-47. PubMed ID: 23581810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stimulus-Response and Response-Effect Compatibility With Touchless Gestures and Moving Action Effects.
    Janczyk M; Xiong A; Proctor RW
    Hum Factors; 2019 Dec; 61(8):1297-1314. PubMed ID: 30844314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dissociating affordance and spatial compatibility effects using a pantomimed reaching action.
    Couth S; Gowen E; Poliakoff E
    Exp Brain Res; 2014 Mar; 232(3):855-64. PubMed ID: 24337351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. N2pc is modulated by stimulus-stimulus, but not by stimulus-response incompatibilities.
    Cespón J; Galdo-Álvarez S; Díaz F
    Biol Psychol; 2013 Apr; 93(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 23380335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dissociating stimulus-response compatibility and modality compatibility in task switching.
    Friedgen E; Koch I; Stephan DN
    Mem Cognit; 2022 Oct; 50(7):1546-1562. PubMed ID: 35103924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Modality compatibility biases voluntary choice of response modality in task switching.
    Fintor E; Poljac E; Stephan DN; Koch I
    Psychol Res; 2020 Mar; 84(2):380-388. PubMed ID: 29926170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stimulus-response correspondence across peripersonal space is unaffected by chronic unilateral limb loss.
    Philip BA; Frey SH
    Exp Brain Res; 2013 Feb; 224(3):373-82. PubMed ID: 23138521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Selection and maintenance of stimulus-response rules during preparation and performance of a spatial choice-reaction task.
    Schumacher EH; Cole MW; D'Esposito M
    Brain Res; 2007 Mar; 1136(1):77-87. PubMed ID: 17223091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reaching into response selection: Stimulus and response similarity influence central operations.
    Wifall T; Buss AT; Farmer TA; Spencer JP; Hazeltine E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Mar; 43(3):555-568. PubMed ID: 28080115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of instructions, practice, and stimulus-hand correspondence on the Simon effect.
    Roswarski TE; Proctor RW
    Psychol Res; 2003 Feb; 67(1):43-55. PubMed ID: 12589449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of prior practice on the stimulus-response compatibility effect in a mixed mapping environment.
    Creekmur B; Vu KP
    Am J Psychol; 2012; 125(3):335-49. PubMed ID: 22953692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Neural mechanisms of spatial stimulus-response compatibility: the effect of crossed-hand position.
    Matsumoto E; Misaki M; Miyauchi S
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Sep; 158(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 15029467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Correlations between spatial compatibility effects: are arrows more like locations or words?
    Miles JD; Proctor RW
    Psychol Res; 2012 Nov; 76(6):777-91. PubMed ID: 21909980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of stimulus-response compatibility on cortical motor activation.
    Dassonville P; Lewis SM; Zhu XH; Ugurbil K; Kim SG; Ashe J
    Neuroimage; 2001 Jan; 13(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 11133304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Brain-behavior relationships: evidence from practice effects in spatial stimulus-response compatibility.
    Iacoboni M; Woods RP; Mazziotta JC
    J Neurophysiol; 1996 Jul; 76(1):321-31. PubMed ID: 8836228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Response compatibility and the relationship between event-related potentials and the timing of a motor response.
    Goodin DS; Aminoff MJ; Chequer RS; Ortiz TA
    J Neurophysiol; 1996 Dec; 76(6):3705-13. PubMed ID: 8985868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mixing compatible and incompatible mappings: elimination, reduction, and enhancement of spatial compatibility effects.
    Vu KP; Proctor RW
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Apr; 57(3):539-56. PubMed ID: 15204140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is automatic imitation a specialized form of stimulus-response compatibility? Dissociating imitative and spatial compatibilities.
    Boyer TW; Longo MR; Bertenthal BI
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Mar; 139(3):440-8. PubMed ID: 22326448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.