These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9839351)

  • 1. Option-3 median measurement scheme in outlier reduction.
    Yang MC; Namgung YY; Kang T; Magnusson I; Hefti A
    Stat Med; 1998 Nov; 17(22):2607-15. PubMed ID: 9839351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluating the merits of option-3 methods in relative attachment level measurement in a healthy population.
    Johnson P; Yang MC; Magnusson I; Kang T; Ramirez J; Hefti AF
    J Periodontal Res; 1997 Feb; 32(2):256-63. PubMed ID: 9089493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The strategy and advantage in use of an electronic probe for attachment measurement.
    Clark WB; Magnusson I; Namgung YY; Yang MC
    Adv Dent Res; 1993 Aug; 7(2):152-7. PubMed ID: 8260002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Option-4 algorithm for third generation disc probe: agreement of selected site-specific relative attachment level measurements and detection of longitudinal site-specific attachment level change.
    Breen HJ; Rogers PA; Slaney RE; Gillett IR; Johnson NW
    J Periodontol; 1999 Feb; 70(2):159-70. PubMed ID: 10102553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Outlier reduction by an option-3 measurement scheme.
    Namgung YY; Yang MC
    Biometrics; 1994 Mar; 50(1):173-82. PubMed ID: 8086600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Option-4 algorithm for automated disc probe: reduction in the variance of site-specific relative attachment level measurements.
    Breen HJ; Rogers PA; Slaney RE; Lawless HC; Austin JS; Gillett IR; Johnson NW
    J Periodontol; 1997 May; 68(5):456-66. PubMed ID: 9182741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The use of periodontal probes and radiographs in clinical trials of diagnostic tests.
    Reddy MS
    Ann Periodontol; 1997 Mar; 2(1):113-22. PubMed ID: 9151548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reliability of single and double probing attachment level measurements.
    Zappa U; Simona C; Graf H; Case D; Thomas J
    J Clin Periodontol; 1995 Oct; 22(10):764-71. PubMed ID: 8682923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Advances in periodontal diagnosis. 2. New clinical methods of diagnosis.
    Eley BM; Cox SW
    Br Dent J; 1998 Jan; 184(2):71-4. PubMed ID: 9489214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Studies on the relationship between changes in radiographic bone height and probing attachment.
    Hausmann E; Allen K; Norderyd J; Ren W; Shibly O; Machtei E
    J Clin Periodontol; 1994 Feb; 21(2):128-32. PubMed ID: 8144732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reproducibility of attachment level recordings using an electronic and a conventional probe.
    Villata L; Baelum V
    J Periodontol; 1996 Dec; 67(12):1292-300. PubMed ID: 8997676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prediction and diagnosis of attachment loss by enhanced chemiluminescent assay of crevicular fluid alkaline phosphatase levels.
    Chapple IL; Garner I; Saxby MS; Moscrop H; Matthews JB
    J Clin Periodontol; 1999 Mar; 26(3):190-8. PubMed ID: 10100046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Site-specific attachment level change detected by physical probing in untreated chronic adult periodontitis: review of studies 1982-1997.
    Breen HJ; Johnson NW; Rogers PA
    J Periodontol; 1999 Mar; 70(3):312-28. PubMed ID: 10225549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reproducibility and detection threshold of peri-implant diagnostics.
    van Steenberghe D; Quirynen M
    Adv Dent Res; 1993 Aug; 7(2):191-5. PubMed ID: 8260007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of two pressure-sensitive periodontal probes and a manual periodontal probe in shallow and deep pockets.
    Rams TE; Slots J
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1993 Dec; 13(6):520-9. PubMed ID: 8181912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The reproducibility and validity of furcation measurements using a pressure-calibrated probe.
    Kim TS; Knittel M; Staehle HJ; Eickholz P
    J Clin Periodontol; 1996 Sep; 23(9):826-31. PubMed ID: 8891933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Measurement of clinical attachment levels using a constant-force periodontal probe modified to detect the cemento-enamel junction.
    Preshaw PM; Kupp L; Hefti AF; Mariotti A
    J Clin Periodontol; 1999 Jul; 26(7):434-40. PubMed ID: 10412847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of manual and controlled-force attachment-level measurements.
    Reddy MS; Palcanis KG; Geurs NC
    J Clin Periodontol; 1997 Dec; 24(12):920-6. PubMed ID: 9442430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An investigation of the validity of attachment level measurements with an automated periodontal probe.
    Ahmed N; Watts TL; Wilson RF
    J Clin Periodontol; 1996 May; 23(5):452-5. PubMed ID: 8783050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reproducibility and validity of the assessment of clinical furcation parameters as related to different probes.
    Eickholz P; Kim TS
    J Periodontol; 1998 Mar; 69(3):328-36. PubMed ID: 9579619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.