These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9840032)

  • 1. Comparison of two-dimensional MR digital subtraction angiography of the lower extremity with x-ray angiography.
    Winchester PA; Lee HM; Khilnani NM; Wang Y; Trost DW; Bush HL; Sos TA
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 1998; 9(6):891-9; discussion 900. PubMed ID: 9840032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical utility of time-resolved imaging of contrast kinetics (TRICKS) magnetic resonance angiography for infrageniculate arterial occlusive disease.
    Mell M; Tefera G; Thornton F; Siepman D; Turnipseed W
    J Vasc Surg; 2007 Mar; 45(3):543-8; discussion 548. PubMed ID: 17223303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Distal lower extremity arteries: evaluation with two-dimensional MR digital subtraction angiography.
    Lee HM; Wang Y; Sostman HD; Schwartz LH; Khilnani NM; Trost DW; Ramirez de Arellano E; Teeger S; Bush HL
    Radiology; 1998 May; 207(2):505-12. PubMed ID: 9577502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. MR angiography of infrapopliteal arteries in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease by using Gadofosveset at 3.0 T: diagnostic accuracy compared with selective DSA.
    Bonel HM; Saar B; Hoppe H; Keo HH; Husmann M; Nikolaou K; Ludwig K; Szucs-Farkas Z; Srivastav S; Kickuth R
    Radiology; 2009 Dec; 253(3):879-90. PubMed ID: 19864508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intraarterial MR angiography and DSA in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease: prospective comparison.
    Huegli RW; Aschwanden M; Bongartz G; Jaeger K; Heidecker HG; Thalhammer C; Schulte AC; Hashagen C; Jacob AL; Bilecen D
    Radiology; 2006 Jun; 239(3):901-8. PubMed ID: 16641335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diabetes and peripheral arterial occlusive disease: prospective comparison of contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography with conventional digital subtraction angiography.
    Kreitner KF; Kalden P; Neufang A; Düber C; Krummenauer F; Küstner E; Laub G; Thelen M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Jan; 174(1):171-9. PubMed ID: 10628475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [First clinical results in a study of contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography with the 1.0 molar gadobutrol in peripheral arterial occlusive disease--comparison to intraarterial DSA].
    Schäfer FK; Schäfer PJ; Jahnke T; Walluscheck K; Priebe M; Hentsch A; Heller M; Brossmann J
    Rofo; 2003 Apr; 175(4):556-64. PubMed ID: 12677513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Lower extremity occlusive disease: diagnostic imaging with a combination of cardiac-gated 2D phase-contrast and cardiac-gated 2D time-of-flight MRA.
    Steffens JC; Link J; Schwarzenberg H; Mueller-Huelsbeck S; Brinkmann G; Heller M
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1999; 23(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 10050798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Routine use of three-dimensional contrast-enhanced moving-table MR angiography in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease: comparison with selective digital subtraction angiography.
    Deutschmann HA; Schoellnast H; Portugaller HR; Preidler KW; Reittner P; Tillich M; Pilger E; Szolar DH
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2006; 29(5):762-70. PubMed ID: 16625410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR angiography from the distal aorta to the ankle joint with a step-by-step technique.
    Huber A; Heuck A; Baur A; Helmberger T; Waggershauser T; Billing A; Heiss M; Petsch R; Reiser M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Nov; 175(5):1291-8. PubMed ID: 11044026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Aortoiliac and lower extremity arteries: comparison of three-dimensional dynamic contrast-enhanced subtraction MR angiography and conventional angiography.
    Sueyoshi E; Sakamoto I; Matsuoka Y; Ogawa Y; Hayashi H; Hashmi R; Hayashi K
    Radiology; 1999 Mar; 210(3):683-8. PubMed ID: 10207467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Peripheral arteries in diabetic patients: standard bolus-chase and time-resolved MR angiography.
    Andreisek G; Pfammatter T; Goepfert K; Nanz D; Hervo P; Koppensteiner R; Weishaupt D
    Radiology; 2007 Feb; 242(2):610-20. PubMed ID: 17179394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intra-arterial MR-angiography on an open-bore MR-scanner compared to digital-subtraction angiography of the infra-popliteal runoff in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease.
    Huegli RW; Thalhammer C; Jacob AL; Jaeger K; Bilecen D
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 Jun; 66(3):519-25. PubMed ID: 17658713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Diagnostic accuracy of time-resolved 2D projection MR angiography for symptomatic infrapopliteal arterial occlusive disease.
    Zhang HL; Khilnani NM; Prince MR; Winchester PA; Golia P; Veit P; Watts R; Wang Y
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Mar; 184(3):938-47. PubMed ID: 15728621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Value of color duplex sonography for evaluation of tibioperoneal arteries in patients with femoropopliteal obstruction: a prospective comparison with anterograde intraarterial digital subtraction angiography.
    Larch E; Minar E; Ahmadi R; Schnürer G; Schneider B; Stümpflen A; Ehringer H
    J Vasc Surg; 1997 Apr; 25(4):629-36. PubMed ID: 9129617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of treatment plans for lower extremity arterial occlusive disease made with electrocardiography-triggered two-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography and digital subtraction angiography.
    Hoch JR; Kennell TW; Hollister MS; Sproat IA; Swan JS; Acher CW; Burks J; Heisey DM
    Am J Surg; 1999 Aug; 178(2):166-72. PubMed ID: 10487272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Feasibility of peripheral contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography at 3.0 Tesla with a hybrid technique: comparison with digital subtraction angiography.
    Berg F; Bangard C; Bovenschulte H; Hellmich M; Nijenhuis M; Lackner K; Gossmann A
    Invest Radiol; 2008 Sep; 43(9):642-9. PubMed ID: 18708858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of gadofosveset-enhanced three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography with digital subtraction angiography for lower-extremity peripheral arterial occlusive disease.
    Grijalba FU; Esandi MC
    Acta Radiol; 2010 Apr; 51(3):284-9. PubMed ID: 20105092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Contrast enhanced MR angiography in the assessment of relevant stenoses in occlusive disease of the pelvic and lower limb arteries: diagnostic value of a two-step examination protocol in comparison to conventional DSA.
    Winterer JT; Schaefer O; Uhrmeister P; Zimmermann-Paul G; Lehnhardt S; Altehoefer C; Laubenberger J
    Eur J Radiol; 2002 Feb; 41(2):153-60. PubMed ID: 11809545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pedal angiography in peripheral arterial occlusive disease: first-pass i.v. contrast-enhanced MR angiography with blood pool contrast medium versus intraarterial digital subtraction angiography.
    Kos S; Reisinger C; Aschwanden M; Bongartz GM; Jacob AL; Bilecen D
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Mar; 192(3):775-84. PubMed ID: 19234277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.