These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9841395)

  • 1. Animal experimentation rules in India.
    Basu SK; Rath S
    Science; 1998 Oct; 282(5388):415. PubMed ID: 9841395
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Animal experimentation. Strict rules rile Indian scientists.
    Bagla P
    Science; 1998 Sep; 281(5384):1777-8. PubMed ID: 9776673
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Animal welfare. New Indian rules disrupt research.
    Bagla P
    Science; 1999 Jul; 285(5425):180-1. PubMed ID: 10428709
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Billion dollar price tag for new animal rules.
    Holden C
    Science; 1988 Nov; 242(4879):662-3. PubMed ID: 3187514
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Defining distress.
    Alley KE; Cassady JM; Fields H; Glaser R; Goodridge A; Hoffsis GF; Moser BD; Sanfilippo F; Yonushonis WP
    Science; 2001 Mar; 291(5512):2316-7. PubMed ID: 11269299
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Research protocol review for animal welfare.
    Orlans FB
    Invest Radiol; 1987 Mar; 22(3):253-8. PubMed ID: 3557901
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Regulation of animal experimentation.
    Dresser R
    JAMA; 1986 Mar; 255(12):1567-8. PubMed ID: 3951087
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Animal experimentation. India backs off on central control.
    Bagla P
    Science; 1998 Dec; 282(5396):1967. PubMed ID: 9874641
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Animals in research.
    JAMA; 1988 Oct; 260(14):2061-4. PubMed ID: 3418870
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. New animal regulations causing scientists pain and distress.
    Holden C
    Science; 1986 Aug; 233(4764):619. PubMed ID: 3726551
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Animal regulations: so far, so good.
    Holden C
    Science; 1987 Nov; 238(4829):880-2. PubMed ID: 3672130
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Australian animal ethics committees: we have come a long way.
    Anderson WP; Perry MA
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1999; 8(1):80-6. PubMed ID: 9924622
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Regulation of animal experimentation in Sweden.
    Skoglund E
    Acta Physiol Scand; 1986; 128(Suppl. 554):153-7. PubMed ID: 11649994
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Row in India over rules on animal experiments.
    Jayaraman KS
    Nature; 1998 Sep; 395(6698):108. PubMed ID: 9744261
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Primate research. NIH withdraws support.
    Clarke M
    Nature; 1985 Oct 3-9; 317(6036):375. PubMed ID: 4047166
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Lax enforcement of animal rules alleged.
    Aldhous P
    Nature; 1990 May; 345(6272):190. PubMed ID: 2333089
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Access to animal care committees.
    Francione GL
    Rutgers Law Rev; 1990; 43(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 11651138
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. NIH watchdog committees.
    Beardsley T
    Nature; 1985 May 23-29; 315(6017):267. PubMed ID: 4000256
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Animal welfare. Tip-off leads to NIH ban.
    Beardsley T
    Nature; 1986 Feb 13-19; 319(6054):524. PubMed ID: 3945336
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Israel restricts animal experiments.
    Siegel-Itzkovich J
    BMJ; 1994 Sep; 309(6957):758. PubMed ID: 7950554
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.