These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9841521)

  • 1. Disparate effects of biphasic and monophasic shocks on postshock refractory period dispersion.
    Sims JJ; Miller AW; Ujhelyi MR
    Am J Physiol; 1998 Jun; 274(6):H1943-9. PubMed ID: 9841521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Refractory interval after transcardiac shocks during ventricular fibrillation.
    Sweeney RJ; Gill RM; Reid PR
    Circulation; 1996 Dec; 94(11):2947-52. PubMed ID: 8941125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The probability of defibrillation success and the incidence of postshock arrhythmia as a function of shock strength.
    Cates AW; Wolf PD; Hillsley RE; Souza JJ; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1994 Jul; 17(7):1208-17. PubMed ID: 7937226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Epicardial sock mapping following monophasic and biphasic shocks of equal voltage with an endocardial lead system.
    Usui M; Callihan RL; Walker RG; Walcott GP; Rollins DL; Wolf PD; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1996 Apr; 7(4):322-34. PubMed ID: 8777480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reduced arrhythmogenicity of biphasic versus monophasic T-wave shocks. Implications for defibrillation efficacy.
    Behrens S; Li C; Kirchhof P; Fabritz FL; Franz MR
    Circulation; 1996 Oct; 94(8):1974-80. PubMed ID: 8873676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Response of relatively refractory canine myocardium to monophasic and biphasic shocks.
    Daubert JP; Frazier DW; Wolf PD; Franz MR; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    Circulation; 1991 Dec; 84(6):2522-38. PubMed ID: 1959202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of monophasic and biphasic shocks on action potentials during ventricular fibrillation in dogs.
    Zhou X; Wolf PD; Rollins DL; Afework Y; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    Circ Res; 1993 Aug; 73(2):325-34. PubMed ID: 8330375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Timing of the upper limit of vulnerability is different for monophasic and biphasic shocks: implications for the determination of the defibrillation threshold.
    Behrens S; Li C; Franz MR
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Sep; 20(9 Pt 1):2179-87. PubMed ID: 9309741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Lidocaine increases the proarrhythmic effects of monophasic but not biphasic shocks.
    Sims JJ; Miller AW; Ujhelyi MR
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2001 Dec; 12(12):1363-8. PubMed ID: 11797993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative efficacy of monophasic and biphasic truncated exponential shocks for nonthoracotomy internal defibrillation in dogs.
    Chapman PD; Vetter JW; Souza JJ; Troup PJ; Wetherbee JN; Hoffmann RG
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1988 Sep; 12(3):739-45. PubMed ID: 3403834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Differential effects of lidocaine on defibrillation threshold with monophasic versus biphasic shock waveforms.
    Ujhelyi MR; Schur M; Frede T; Gabel M; Markel ML
    Circulation; 1995 Sep; 92(6):1644-50. PubMed ID: 7664452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Postshock potential gradients and dispersion of repolarization in cells stimulated with monophasic and biphasic waveforms.
    Sobie EA; Tung L
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1998 Jul; 9(7):743-56. PubMed ID: 9684722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of flecainide, encainide, and clofilium on ventricular refractory period extension by transcardiac shocks.
    Sweeney RJ; Gill RM; Steinberg MI; Reid PR
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Jan; 19(1):50-60. PubMed ID: 8848377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Virtual electrode-induced phase singularity: a basic mechanism of defibrillation failure.
    Efimov IR; Cheng Y; Van Wagoner DR; Mazgalev T; Tchou PJ
    Circ Res; 1998 May; 82(8):918-25. PubMed ID: 9576111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Relation between shock-related myocardial injury and defibrillation efficacy of monophasic and biphasic shocks in a canine model.
    Osswald S; Trouton TG; O'Nunain SS; Holden HB; Ruskin JN; Garan H
    Circulation; 1994 Nov; 90(5):2501-9. PubMed ID: 7955208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Relationship between "extension of refractoriness" and probability of successful defibrillation.
    Tovar OH; Jones JL
    Am J Physiol; 1997 Feb; 272(2 Pt 2):H1011-9. PubMed ID: 9124409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Superiority of biphasic over monophasic defibrillation shocks is attributable to less intracellular calcium transient heterogeneity.
    Hwang GS; Tang L; Joung B; Morita N; Hayashi H; Karagueuzian HS; Weiss JN; Lin SF; Chen PS
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2008 Sep; 52(10):828-35. PubMed ID: 18755345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mechanism of ventricular defibrillation for near-defibrillation threshold shocks: a whole-heart optical mapping study in swine.
    Chattipakorn N; Banville I; Gray RA; Ideker RE
    Circulation; 2001 Sep; 104(11):1313-9. PubMed ID: 11551885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of sodium channel blockade on the defibrillation energy requirements of biphasic versus monophasic shocks.
    Nelson SD; Lenhart MB; Saffarin A
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Nov; 19(11 Pt 1):1568-73. PubMed ID: 8946452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Transthoracic defibrillation of short-lasting ventricular fibrillation: a randomised trial for comparison of the efficacy of low-energy biphasic rectilinear and monophasic damped sine shocks.
    Szili-Torok T; Theuns D; Verblaauw T; Scholten M; Kimman GJ; Res J; Jordaens L
    Acta Cardiol; 2002 Oct; 57(5):329-34. PubMed ID: 12405569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.