These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

313 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9841658)

  • 1. Comparison of ultra- and microfiltration in the presence and absence of secondary flow with polysaccharides, proteins, and yeast suspensions.
    Gehlert G; Luque S; Belfort G
    Biotechnol Prog; 1998; 14(6):931-42. PubMed ID: 9841658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A new coiled hollow-fiber module design for enhanced microfiltration performance in biotechnology.
    Luque S; Mallubhotla H; Gehlert G; Kuriyel R; Dzengeleski S; Pearl S; Belfort G
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 1999 Nov; 65(3):247-57. PubMed ID: 10486122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Protein transmission during Dean vortex microfiltration of yeast suspensions.
    Kluge T; Rezende C; Wood D; Belfort G
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 1999 Dec; 65(6):649-58. PubMed ID: 10550771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dean vortex membrane microfiltration and diafiltration of rBDNF E. coli inclusion bodies.
    Schutyser M; Rupp R; Wideman J; Belfort G
    Biotechnol Prog; 2002; 18(2):322-9. PubMed ID: 11934303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Microfiltration of yeast suspensions with self-cleaning spiral vortices: possibilities for a new membrane module design.
    Mallubhotla H; Nunes E; Belfort G
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 1995 Nov; 48(4):375-85. PubMed ID: 18623498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Membrane foulants and fouling mechanisms in microfiltration and ultrafiltration of an activated sludge effluent.
    Nguyen ST; Roddick FA; Harris JL
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 62(9):1975-83. PubMed ID: 21045321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Autopsy of high-pressure membranes to compare effectiveness of MF and UF pretreatment in water reclamation.
    Kim J; DiGiano FA; Reardon RD
    Water Res; 2008 Feb; 42(3):697-706. PubMed ID: 17961627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of MFI-UF constant pressure, MFI-UF constant flux and Crossflow Sampler-Modified Fouling Index Ultrafiltration (CFS-MFI UF).
    Sim LN; Ye Y; Chen V; Fane AG
    Water Res; 2011 Feb; 45(4):1639-50. PubMed ID: 21194721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A crossflow filtration system for constant permeate flux membrane fouling characterization.
    Miller DJ; Paul DR; Freeman BD
    Rev Sci Instrum; 2013 Mar; 84(3):035003. PubMed ID: 23556842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Studies on the effect of humic acids and phenol on adsorption-ultrafiltration process performance.
    Mozia S; Tomaszewska M; Morawski AW
    Water Res; 2005; 39(2-3):501-9. PubMed ID: 15644259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fouling of nanofiltration, reverse osmosis, and ultrafiltration membranes by protein mixtures: the role of inter-foulant-species interaction.
    Wang YN; Tang CY
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Aug; 45(15):6373-9. PubMed ID: 21678956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Identification and understanding of fouling in low-pressure membrane (MF/UF) filtration by natural organic matter (NOM).
    Lee N; Amy G; Croué JP; Buisson H
    Water Res; 2004 Dec; 38(20):4511-23. PubMed ID: 15556226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A new integrated membrane filtration and chromatographic device.
    Xu Y; Sirkar KK; Dai XP; Luo RG
    Biotechnol Prog; 2005; 21(2):590-7. PubMed ID: 15801803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Global model for optimizing crossflow microfiltration and ultrafiltration processes: a new predictive and design tool.
    Baruah GL; Venkiteshwaran A; Belfort G
    Biotechnol Prog; 2005; 21(4):1013-25. PubMed ID: 16080678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of membrane configuration on bench-scale MF and UF fouling experiments.
    Howe KJ; Marwah A; Chiu KP; Adham SS
    Water Res; 2007 Sep; 41(17):3842-9. PubMed ID: 17582459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Microfiltration of skim milk and modified skim milk using a 0.1-µm ceramic uniform transmembrane pressure system at temperatures of 50, 55, 60, and 65°C.
    Hurt EE; Adams MC; Barbano DM
    J Dairy Sci; 2015 Feb; 98(2):765-80. PubMed ID: 25497798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biofilm increases permeate quality by organic carbon degradation in low pressure ultrafiltration.
    Chomiak A; Traber J; Morgenroth E; Derlon N
    Water Res; 2015 Nov; 85():512-20. PubMed ID: 26386342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of colloidal fouling and gas sparging on microfiltration of yeast suspension.
    Gupta BS; Hasan S; Hashim MA; Cui ZF
    Bioprocess Biosyst Eng; 2005 Oct; 27(6):407-413. PubMed ID: 16096765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Crossflow microfiltration of yeast suspensions in tubular filters.
    Redkar SG; Davis RH
    Biotechnol Prog; 1993; 9(6):625-34. PubMed ID: 7764351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modeling the influence of slurry concentration on Saccharomyces cerevisiae cake porosity and resistance during microfiltration.
    Mota M; Flickinger MC
    Biotechnol Prog; 2012; 28(6):1534-41. PubMed ID: 23011664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.