These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

357 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9841790)

  • 21. The neural basis of the right visual field advantage in reading: an MEG analysis using virtual electrodes.
    Barca L; Cornelissen P; Simpson M; Urooj U; Woods W; Ellis AW
    Brain Lang; 2011 Sep; 118(3):53-71. PubMed ID: 20932563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Left-right and upper-lower visual field asymmetries for face matching, letter naming, and lexical decision.
    Hagenbeek RE; Van Strien JW
    Brain Cogn; 2002 Jun; 49(1):34-44. PubMed ID: 12027390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Imageability and word recognition in the left and right visual fields: a signal detection analysis.
    Chiarello C; Liu S; Quan N; Shears C
    Brain Cogn; 2000; 43(1-3):90-4. PubMed ID: 10857670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Hemisphericity and top-down processing of language.
    Faust M; Kravetz S; Babkoff H
    Brain Lang; 1993 Jan; 44(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 8467373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Right visual field advantage for perceived contrast: correlation with an auditory bias and handedness.
    Railo H; Tallus J; Hämäläinen H
    Brain Cogn; 2011 Dec; 77(3):391-400. PubMed ID: 21962763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Attentional deployment in visual half-field tasks: the effect of cue position on word naming latency.
    Lindell AK; Nicholls ME
    Brain Cogn; 2003 Nov; 53(2):273-7. PubMed ID: 14607163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. What do lateralized displays tell us about visual word perception? A cautionary indication from the word-letter effect.
    Jordan TR; Patching GR
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(11):1504-14. PubMed ID: 15246288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The effect of word length on hemispheric word recognition: evidence from unilateral and bilateral-redundant presentations.
    Lindell AK; Nicholls ME; Castles AE
    Brain Cogn; 2002; 48(2-3):447-52. PubMed ID: 12030486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A comparison of upper vs. lower and right vs. left visual fields using lexical decision.
    Goldstein A; Babkoff H
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2001 Nov; 54(4):1239-59. PubMed ID: 11765742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Upper and lower visual field differences in perceptual asymmetries.
    Thomas NA; Elias LJ
    Brain Res; 2011 Apr; 1387():108-15. PubMed ID: 21362412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. On the interdependency between attentional biases and visual field effects with bilateral presentations of stimuli.
    Lupien S; Lafrance MS; Lecours AR
    Brain Cogn; 1993 Mar; 21(2):153-62. PubMed ID: 8442932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Hemispheric differences in attentional orienting by social cues.
    Greene DJ; Zaidel E
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jan; 49(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 21093465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Improving residual vision by attentional cueing in patients with brain lesions.
    Poggel DA; Kasten E; Müller-Oehring EM; Bunzenthal U; Sabel BA
    Brain Res; 2006 Jun; 1097(1):142-8. PubMed ID: 16777076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Dissociating prelexical and postlexical processing of affective information in the two hemispheres: effects of the stimulus presentation format.
    Windmann S; Daum I; Güntürkün O
    Brain Lang; 2002 Mar; 80(3):269-86. PubMed ID: 11896641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Quantitative and qualitative hemispheric asymmetry for processing Japanese kana.
    Hellige JB; Yamauchi M
    Brain Cogn; 1999 Aug; 40(3):453-63. PubMed ID: 10415131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Isolating the internal in endogenous attention.
    Hopfinger JB; Camblin CC; Parks EL
    Psychophysiology; 2010 Jul; 47(4):739-47. PubMed ID: 20149137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The non-contribution of attentional biases to visual field asymmetries for temporal discrimination.
    Nicholls ME
    Neuropsychologia; 1994 Feb; 32(2):209-20. PubMed ID: 8190244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Deficits in peripheral visual attention in patients with optic ataxia.
    Striemer C; Blangero A; Rossetti Y; Boisson D; Rode G; Vighetto A; Pisella L; Danckert J
    Neuroreport; 2007 Jul; 18(11):1171-5. PubMed ID: 17589321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A right visual field advantage for tool-recognition in the visual half-field paradigm.
    Verma A; Brysbaert M
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jul; 49(9):2342-8. PubMed ID: 21527265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Phonological processing of words in right- and left-handers.
    Tremblay T; Monetta L; Joanette Y
    Brain Cogn; 2004 Aug; 55(3):427-32. PubMed ID: 15223185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.