These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9842209)

  • 1. [Modifications to the technic of cesarean section after Stark].
    Corosu R; Roma B; Marziali M; Di Roberto R
    Minerva Ginecol; 1998 Sep; 50(9):391-5. PubMed ID: 9842209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Stark's method of cesarean section. Advantages compared to the traditional method].
    Corosu R; Roma B; Vizzaccaro F; Franchi M
    Minerva Ginecol; 1999 May; 51(5):203-5. PubMed ID: 10431531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Clinical observation of Stark cesarean section as secondary abdominal surgery].
    Ma YY; Zhu XL; Dong Y; Wang YQ; Zheng ZM; Zhang RJ; Xu Y; Zhao JJ
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2005 Nov; 40(11):729-31. PubMed ID: 16324243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Techniques for performing caesarean section.
    Hema KR; Johanson R
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2001 Feb; 15(1):17-47. PubMed ID: 11359313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An incision technique for emergency cesarean section.
    Goodlin RC
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1987 Dec; 165(6):544-6. PubMed ID: 2961096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Review of advantages of Joel-Cohen surgical abdominal incision in caesarean section: a basic science perspective.
    Karanth KL; Sathish N
    Med J Malaysia; 2010 Sep; 65(3):204-8. PubMed ID: 21939169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [The overall and step-by-step duration of cesarean section].
    Dimitrov A; Stamenov G; Krŭsteva K
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 1999; 38(3):7-10. PubMed ID: 10734668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Innovations of the Stark method for cesarean section. Comparison of techniques].
    Grignaffini A; Bazzani F; Rinaldi M; Azzoni D; Vadora E
    Minerva Ginecol; 1999 Dec; 51(12):475-82. PubMed ID: 10767996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Non-closure of peritoneum at cesarean section. Results from repeat cesarean sections].
    Nather A; Zeisler H; Sam CE; Husslein P; Joura EA
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2001 Jun; 113(11-12):451-3. PubMed ID: 11467092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Incidence of significant adhesions at repeat cesarean section and the relationship to method of prior peritoneal closure.
    Myers SA; Bennett TL
    J Reprod Med; 2005 Sep; 50(9):659-62. PubMed ID: 16363753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Two observations of evisceration after caesarean section performed according the so-called Stark procedure].
    Fournié A; Madzou S; Sentilhes L; Descamps P
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2008 Dec; 36(12):1211-3. PubMed ID: 19010708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Comparative evaluation of the Joel-Cohen cesarean section versus the transrectal incision].
    Le Dû R; Bernardini M; Agostini A; Mazouni C; Shojai R; Blanc B; Gamerre M; Bretelle F
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2007 Sep; 36(5):447-50. PubMed ID: 17335999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Incidence of infected surgical wound and prophylaxis with cefotaxime in cesarean section].
    Lemus Rocha R; García Gutiérrez LB; Basavilvazo Rodríguez MA; Cruz Avelar A; Peralta Pedrero ML; Hernández Valencia M
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2005 Oct; 73(10):537-43. PubMed ID: 16583834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Non-closure versus closure of peritoneum during cesarean section: a randomized study.
    Zareian Z; Zareian P
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2006; 128(1-2):267-9. PubMed ID: 16716491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Cesarean section according to Stark].
    Messalli EM; Cobellis L; Pierno G
    Minerva Ginecol; 2001 Oct; 53(5):367-71. PubMed ID: 11550004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Comparative trial between traditional cesarean section and Misgav-Ladach technique].
    Gutiérrez JG; Coló JA; Arreola MS
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2008 Feb; 76(2):75-80. PubMed ID: 18798399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prospective study of non-closure or closure of the peritoneum at cesarean delivery in 124 women: Impact of prior peritoneal closure at primary cesarean on the interval time between first cesarean section and the next pregnancy and significant adhesion at second cesarean.
    Komoto Y; Shimoya K; Shimizu T; Kimura T; Hayashi S; Temma-Asano K; Kanagawa T; Fukuda H; Murata Y
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2006 Aug; 32(4):396-402. PubMed ID: 16882265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Modification of extraperitoneal cesarean section in the prevention of infection].
    Mimić B
    Med Arh; 1990; 44(1):23-5. PubMed ID: 2093771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Misgav Ladach method: a step forward in the operative technique of caesarean section.
    Poonam ; Banerjee B; Singh SN; Raina A
    Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ); 2006; 4(2):198-202. PubMed ID: 18603898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative study of the ''Misgav Ladach'' and traditional Pfannenstiel surgical techniques for cesarean section.
    Belci D; Kos M; Zoricić D; Kuharić L; Slivar A; Begić-Razem E; Grdinić I
    Minerva Ginecol; 2007 Jun; 59(3):231-40. PubMed ID: 17576402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.