These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9842832)

  • 1. A comparison of pharyngeal mucosal pressure and airway sealing pressure with the laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized adult patients.
    Brimacombe J; Keller C
    Anesth Analg; 1998 Dec; 87(6):1379-82. PubMed ID: 9842832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pharyngeal mucosal pressures, airway sealing pressures, and fiberoptic position with the intubating versus the standard laryngeal mask airway.
    Keller C; Brimacombe J
    Anesthesiology; 1999 Apr; 90(4):1001-6. PubMed ID: 10201670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pharyngeal mucosal pressures with the laryngeal tube airway versus ProSeal laryngeal mask airway.
    Keller C; Brimacombe J; Kleinsasser A; Loeckinger A
    Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther; 2003 Jun; 38(6):393-6. PubMed ID: 12759874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of the flexible and standard laryngeal mask airways.
    Brimacombe J; Keller C
    Can J Anaesth; 1999 Jun; 46(6):558-63. PubMed ID: 10391603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of neuromuscular block, mode of ventilation and respiratory cycle on pharyngeal mucosal pressures with the laryngeal mask airway.
    Keller C; Brimacombe J
    Br J Anaesth; 1999 Sep; 83(3):480-2. PubMed ID: 10655926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pharyngeal mucosal pressure and perfusion: a fiberoptic evaluation of the posterior pharynx in anesthetized adult patients with a modified cuffed oropharyngeal airway.
    Brimacombe J; Keller C; Pühringer F
    Anesthesiology; 1999 Dec; 91(6):1661-5. PubMed ID: 10598608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Laryngeal mask airway size selection in males and females: ease of insertion, oropharyngeal leak pressure, pharyngeal mucosal pressures and anatomical position.
    Brimacombe J; Keller C
    Br J Anaesth; 1999 May; 82(5):703-7. PubMed ID: 10536546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Calculated vs measured pharyngeal mucosal pressures with the laryngeal mask airway during cuff inflation: assessment of four locations.
    Keller C; Brimacombe J; Benzer A
    Br J Anaesth; 1999 Mar; 82(3):399-401. PubMed ID: 10434824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mucosal pressures from the cuffed oropharyngeal airway vs the laryngeal mask airway.
    Keller C; Brimacombe J
    Br J Anaesth; 1999 Jun; 82(6):922-4. PubMed ID: 10562790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of the disposable versus the reusable laryngeal mask airway in paralyzed adult patients.
    Brimacombe J; Keller C; Morris R; Mecklem D
    Anesth Analg; 1998 Oct; 87(4):921-4. PubMed ID: 9768795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The influence of cuff volume and anatomic location on pharyngeal, esophageal, and tracheal mucosal pressures with the esophageal tracheal combitube.
    Keller C; Brimacombe J; Boehler M; Loeckinger A; Puehringer F
    Anesthesiology; 2002 May; 96(5):1074-7. PubMed ID: 11981145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mucosal pressure and oropharyngeal leak pressure with the ProSeal versus laryngeal mask airway in anaesthetized paralysed patients.
    Keller C; Brimacombe J
    Br J Anaesth; 2000 Aug; 85(2):262-6. PubMed ID: 10992836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of mucosal pressures induced by cuffs of different airway devices.
    Ulrich-Pur H; Hrska F; Krafft P; Friehs H; Wulkersdorfer B; Köstler WJ; Rabitsch W; Staudinger T; Schuster E; Frass M
    Anesthesiology; 2006 May; 104(5):933-8. PubMed ID: 16645443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pressure exerted by the laryngeal mask airway cuff upon the pharyngeal mucosa.
    Marjot R
    Br J Anaesth; 1993 Jan; 70(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 8431328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Large cuff volumes impede posterior pharyngeal mucosal perfusion with the laryngeal tube airway.
    Brimacombe J; Keller C; Roth W; Loeckinger A
    Can J Anaesth; 2002 Dec; 49(10):1084-7. PubMed ID: 12477684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. High laryngeal mask airway pressures resulting from nitrous oxide do not increase pharyngeal mucosal injury in dogs.
    Abud TM; Braz JR; Martins RH; Gregório EA; Saldanha JC
    Can J Anaesth; 2001 Sep; 48(8):800-6. PubMed ID: 11546723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Application of Minimum Effective Cuff Inflating Volume for Laryngeal Mask Airway and its Impact on Postoperative Pharyngeal Complications.
    Li BB; Yan J; Zhou HG; Hao J; Liu AJ; Ma ZL
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2015 Oct; 128(19):2570-6. PubMed ID: 26415792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pressures exerted against the cervical vertebrae by the standard and intubating laryngeal mask airways: a randomized, controlled, cross-over study in fresh cadavers.
    Keller C; Brimacombe J; Keller K
    Anesth Analg; 1999 Nov; 89(5):1296-300. PubMed ID: 10553855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A study of laryngeal mask inflation. Pressures exerted on the pharynx.
    O'Kelly SW; Heath KJ; Lawes EG
    Anaesthesia; 1993 Dec; 48(12):1075-8. PubMed ID: 8285330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A pilot study of pharyngeal pulse oximetry with the laryngeal mask airway: a comparison with finger oximetry and arterial saturation measurements in healthy anesthetized patients.
    Keller C; Brimacombe J; Agrò F; Margreiter J
    Anesth Analg; 2000 Feb; 90(2):440-4. PubMed ID: 10648336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.