These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9844089)

  • 1. Exploring the precursors of outcome evaluation in Australia: linking structure, process and outcome by peer review.
    Middleton S; Lumby J
    Int J Nurs Pract; 1998 Sep; 4(3):151-5. PubMed ID: 9844089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Outcome evaluation in nursing in Australia, 1960-1980.
    Middleton S; Lumby J
    Aust Health Rev; 1998; 21(4):72-9. PubMed ID: 10537570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Achieving improvement through quality: an evaluation of key factors in the implementation process.
    Harvey G; Kitson A
    J Adv Nurs; 1996 Jul; 24(1):185-95. PubMed ID: 8807395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An evaluation of approaches to assessing the quality of nursing care using (predetermined) quality assurance tools.
    Harvey G
    J Adv Nurs; 1991 Mar; 16(3):277-86. PubMed ID: 2037732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quality of nursing documentation and approaches to its evaluation: a mixed-method systematic review.
    Wang N; Hailey D; Yu P
    J Adv Nurs; 2011 Sep; 67(9):1858-75. PubMed ID: 21466578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evidence-based health care: development and audit of a clinical standard for research and its impact on an NHS trust.
    Parkin C; Bullock I
    J Clin Nurs; 2005 Apr; 14(4):418-25. PubMed ID: 15807748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Description and comparison of documentation of nursing assessment between paper-based and electronic systems in Australian aged care homes.
    Wang N; Yu P; Hailey D
    Int J Med Inform; 2013 Sep; 82(9):789-97. PubMed ID: 23786709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Peer review in nursing and midwifery: a literature review.
    Rout A; Roberts P
    J Clin Nurs; 2008 Feb; 17(4):427-42. PubMed ID: 17419775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quality of nursing documentation: Paper-based health records versus electronic-based health records.
    Akhu-Zaheya L; Al-Maaitah R; Bany Hani S
    J Clin Nurs; 2018 Feb; 27(3-4):e578-e589. PubMed ID: 28981172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Peer review of cancer multidisciplinary teams: is it acceptable in Australia?
    Slavova-Azmanova NS; Johnson CE; Platell C; Bydder S; Saunders CM
    Med J Aust; 2015 Feb; 202(3):144-7. PubMed ID: 25669477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A peer review program for professional nurses.
    Cohen B; Berube R; Turrentine B
    J Nurs Staff Dev; 1996; 12(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 8699271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [The results of nursing interventions: is an evaluation possible?].
    Di Giulio P
    Riv Inferm; 1992; 11(4):212-8. PubMed ID: 1296268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Progress in assessing the quality of Australian nursing home care.
    Braithwaite V; Braithwaite J; Gibson D; Makkai T
    Aust J Public Health; 1992 Mar; 16(1):89-97. PubMed ID: 1627720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The quality of paper-based versus electronic nursing care plan in Australian aged care homes: A documentation audit study.
    Wang N; Yu P; Hailey D
    Int J Med Inform; 2015 Aug; 84(8):561-9. PubMed ID: 26004340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An introduction to the evaluation of nursing care: a review of the literature.
    Wright D
    J Adv Nurs; 1984 Sep; 9(5):457-67. PubMed ID: 6567649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Nursing morbidity and mortality conferences: promoting clinical excellence.
    Pagano LA; Lookinland S
    Am J Crit Care; 2006 Jan; 15(1):78-85. PubMed ID: 16391317
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development of an instrument to measure the quality of documented nursing diagnoses, interventions and outcomes: the Q-DIO.
    Müller-Staub M; Lunney M; Odenbreit M; Needham I; Lavin MA; van Achterberg T
    J Clin Nurs; 2009 Apr; 18(7):1027-37. PubMed ID: 19220614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comprehensive audit of nursing record keeping practice.
    Griffiths P; Debbage S; Smith A
    Br J Nurs; 2007 Nov 22-Dec 12; 16(21):1324-7. PubMed ID: 18073669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The functional message behavior inventory. Linking nursing action with health care outcomes.
    Kasch CR; Knutson K
    Nurse Pract; 1986 Jun; 11(6):61-7. PubMed ID: 3714139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Nursing process outcome linkage research: issues, current status, and health policy implications.
    Maas ML; Delaney C
    Med Care; 2004 Feb; 42(2 Suppl):II40-8. PubMed ID: 14734941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.