These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9844201)

  • 1. Presurgical profile preferences of patients and clinicians.
    Arpino VJ; Giddon DB; BeGole EA; Evans CA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Dec; 114(6):631-7. PubMed ID: 9844201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of perceptions of computer-animated left- and right-facing profiles.
    Anderson NK; Evans CA; Giddon DB
    J Prosthodont; 1999 Jun; 8(2):72-9. PubMed ID: 10740505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Profile preferences of Korean American orthodontic patients and orthodontists.
    Park YS; Evans CA; Viana G; Anderson NK; Giddon DB
    World J Orthod; 2006; 7(3):286-92. PubMed ID: 17009479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Subjective evaluation of profile prediction using video imaging.
    Giangreco TA; Forbes DP; Jacobson RS; Kallal RH; Moretti RJ; Marshall SD
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1995; 10(3):211-7. PubMed ID: 9082009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Subjective evaluation of the accuracy of video imaging prediction following orthognathic surgery in Chinese patients.
    Chew MT; Koh CH; Sandham A; Wong HB
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Feb; 66(2):291-6. PubMed ID: 18201611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of the perception of facial profile by the general public and 3 groups of clinicians.
    Cochrane SM; Cunningham SJ; Hunt NP
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1999; 14(4):291-5. PubMed ID: 10895644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computer-animated comparison of self-perception with actual profiles of orthodontic and nonorthodontic subjects.
    Kitay D; BeGole EA; Evans CA; Giddon DB
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1999; 14(2):125-34. PubMed ID: 10686835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of two computer animated imaging programs for quantifying facial profile preference.
    Giddon DB; Bernier DL; Evans CA; Kinchen JA
    Percept Mot Skills; 1996 Jun; 82(3 Pt 2):1251-64. PubMed ID: 8823891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Patient- and clinician-perceived need for orthognathic surgery.
    Juggins KJ; Nixon F; Cunningham SJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Dec; 128(6):697-702. PubMed ID: 16360908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Esthetic preferences of orthodontists, oral surgeons, and laypersons for Persian facial profiles.
    Imani MM; Sanei E; Niaki EA; Shahroudi AS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Sep; 154(3):412-420. PubMed ID: 30173845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quantitative comparison of computerized discrete and animated profile preferences.
    Giddon DB; Sconzo R; Kinchen JA; Evans CA
    Angle Orthod; 1996; 66(6):441-8. PubMed ID: 8974180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of horizontal and vertical differences in facial profiles by orthodontists and lay people.
    Romani KL; Agahi F; Nanda R; Zernik JH
    Angle Orthod; 1993; 63(3):175-82. PubMed ID: 8214785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perceptions of facial profile and their influence on the decision to undergo orthognathic surgery.
    Bell R; Kiyak HA; Joondeph DR; McNeill RW; Wallen TR
    Am J Orthod; 1985 Oct; 88(4):323-32. PubMed ID: 3863490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predicting soft tissue changes in mandibular advancement surgery: a comparison of two video imaging systems.
    Syliangco ST; Sameshima GT; Kaminishi RM; Sinclair PM
    Angle Orthod; 1997; 67(5):337-46. PubMed ID: 9347107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Association between ratings of facial attractivess and patients' motivation for orthognathic surgery.
    Vargo JK; Gladwin M; Ngan P
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2003 Feb; 6(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 12627797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The perception of children's computer-imaged facial profiles by patients, mothers and clinicians.
    Miner RM; Anderson NK; Evans CA; Giddon DB
    Angle Orthod; 2007 Nov; 77(6):1034-9. PubMed ID: 18004912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Profile changes in orthodontic patients treated with mandibular advancement surgery.
    Tsang ST; McFadden LR; Wiltshire WA; Pershad N; Baker AB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jan; 135(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 19121503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of chin prominence on esthetic lip profile preferences.
    Coleman GG; Lindauer SJ; Tüfekçi E; Shroff B; Best AM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jul; 132(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 17628248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Presurgical satisfaction with facial appearance in orthognathic surgery patients.
    van Steenbergen E; Litt MD; Nanda R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1996 Jun; 109(6):653-9. PubMed ID: 8659476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Incorporation of facial plastic surgery in the planning and treatment of orthognathic surgical cases.
    Sarver DM; Matukas VJ; Weissman SM
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1991; 6(4):227-39. PubMed ID: 1820407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.