These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9844211)

  • 1. Soft tissue profile changes from 5 to 45 years of age.
    Bishara SE; Jakobsen JR; Hession TJ; Treder JE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Dec; 114(6):698-706. PubMed ID: 9844211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Longitudinal soft-tissue profile changes: a study of three analyses.
    Bishara SE; Hession TJ; Peterson LC
    Am J Orthod; 1985 Sep; 88(3):209-23. PubMed ID: 3862344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Changes in facial dimensions and relationships between the ages of 5 and 25 years.
    Bishara SE; Peterson LC; Bishara EC
    Am J Orthod; 1984 Mar; 85(3):238-52. PubMed ID: 6584033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Longitudinal changes in three normal facial types.
    Bishara SE; Jakobsen JR
    Am J Orthod; 1985 Dec; 88(6):466-502. PubMed ID: 3878083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of rapid maxillary expansion on Holdaway soft tissue measurements.
    Kiliç N; Kiki A; Oktay H; Erdem A
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Jun; 30(3):239-43. PubMed ID: 18540012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Treatment and posttreatment changes in patients with Class II, Division 1 malocclusion after extraction and nonextraction treatment.
    Bishara SE; Cummins DM; Zaher AR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Jan; 111(1):18-27. PubMed ID: 9009919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of extraction treatment on Holdaway soft-tissue measurements.
    Basciftci FA; Uysal T; Buyukerkmen A; Demir A
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Apr; 74(2):167-73. PubMed ID: 15132442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Soft-tissue profile changes during widening and protraction of the maxilla in patients with cleft lip and palate compared with normal growth and development.
    Tindlund RS; Rygh P
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1993 Sep; 30(5):454-68. PubMed ID: 8218309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A computer assisted photogrammetric analysis of soft tissue changes after orthodontic treatment. Part II: Results.
    Cummins DM; Bishara SE; Jakobsen JR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Jul; 108(1):38-47. PubMed ID: 7598103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Long-term profile changes in extraction and nonextraction patients.
    Stephens CK; Boley JC; Behrents RG; Alexander RG; Buschang PH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Oct; 128(4):450-7. PubMed ID: 16214626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Growth changes in the soft tissue facial profile.
    Nanda RS; Meng H; Kapila S; Goorhuis J
    Angle Orthod; 1990; 60(3):177-90. PubMed ID: 2389850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Posttreatment changes in male and female patients: a comparative study.
    Bishara SE; Ortho D; Jakobsen JR; Angelakis D
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1996 Dec; 110(6):624-9. PubMed ID: 8972809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dentofacial changes in Norwegian and Iowan populations between 6 and 18 years of age.
    el-Batouti A; Bishara S; Ogaard B; Jakobsen J
    Eur J Orthod; 1995 Jun; 17(3):241-9. PubMed ID: 7621925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Facial soft tissue harmony and growth in orthodontic treatment.
    Nanda RS; Ghosh J
    Semin Orthod; 1995 Jun; 1(2):67-81. PubMed ID: 8935046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The extraction of permanent second molars and its effect on the dentofacial complex of patients treated with the Tip-Edge appliance.
    Greatrex PA; Sampson WJ; Richards LC; Twelftree CC
    Eur J Orthod; 2002 Oct; 24(5):501-18. PubMed ID: 12407946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mandibular changes in persons with untreated and treated Class II division 1 malocclusion.
    Bishara SE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Jun; 113(6):661-73. PubMed ID: 9637570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Soft tissue facial profile changes after orthodontic treatment with four premolars extracted.
    Bravo LA
    Angle Orthod; 1994; 64(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 8172393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A computer assisted photogrammetric analysis of soft tissue changes after orthodontic treatment. Part I: Methodology and reliability.
    Bishara SE; Cummins DM; Jorgensen GJ; Jakobsen JR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Jun; 107(6):633-9. PubMed ID: 7771369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A soft-tissue cephalometric analysis and its use in orthodontic treatment planning. Part II.
    Holdaway RA
    Am J Orthod; 1984 Apr; 85(4):279-93. PubMed ID: 6585146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Extraction vs no treatment: Long-term facial profile changes.
    Rathod AB; Araujo E; Vaden JL; Behrents RG; Oliver DR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 May; 147(5):596-603. PubMed ID: 25919105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.