507 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9844322)
21. Automated Retinal Imaging System (ARIS) compared with ETDRS protocol color stereoscopic retinal photography to assess level of diabetic retinopathy.
Maker MP; Noble J; Silva PS; Cavallerano JD; Murtha TJ; Sun JK; Aiello LM; Bursell SE; Aiello LP
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2012 Jun; 14(6):515-22. PubMed ID: 22385213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Sensitivity and specificity of digital retinal images in grading diabetic retinopathy.
Saari JM; Summanen P; Kivelä T; Saari KM
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2004 Apr; 82(2):126-30. PubMed ID: 15043527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Accuracy of single-field nonmydriatic digital fundus image in screening for diabetic retinopathy.
Suansilpong A; Rawdaree P
J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 Sep; 91(9):1397-403. PubMed ID: 18843870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Screening for diabetic retinopathy by ophthalmologists and endocrinologists with pupillary dilation and a nonmydriatic digital camera.
Deb-Joardar N; Germain N; Thuret G; Manoli P; Garcin AF; Millot L; Gavet Y; Estour B; Gain P
Am J Ophthalmol; 2005 Nov; 140(5):814-821. PubMed ID: 16310458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Can digitised colour 35 mm transparencies be used to diagnose diabetic retinopathy?
George LD; Leverton C; Young S; Lusty J; Dunstan FD; Owens DR
Diabet Med; 1997 Nov; 14(11):970-3. PubMed ID: 9400922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Entoptic evaluation of diabetic retinopathy.
Applegate RA; Bradley A; van Heuven WA; Lee BL; Garcia CA
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1997 Apr; 38(5):783-91. PubMed ID: 9112972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Image quality characteristics of a novel colour scanning digital ophthalmoscope (SDO) compared with fundus photography.
Strauss RW; Krieglstein TR; Priglinger SG; Reis W; Ulbig MW; Kampik A; Neubauer AS
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2007 Nov; 27(6):611-8. PubMed ID: 17956367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effect of mydriasis and different field strategies on digital image screening of diabetic eye disease.
Murgatroyd H; Ellingford A; Cox A; Binnie M; Ellis JD; MacEwen CJ; Leese GP
Br J Ophthalmol; 2004 Jul; 88(7):920-4. PubMed ID: 15205238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. What is lost by digitizing stereoscopic fundus color slides for macular grading in age-related maculopathy and degeneration?
Scholl HP; Dandekar SS; Peto T; Bunce C; Xing W; Jenkins S; Bird AC
Ophthalmology; 2004 Jan; 111(1):125-32. PubMed ID: 14711724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Ophthalmoscopy versus fundus photographs for detecting and grading diabetic retinopathy.
Kinyoun JL; Martin DC; Fujimoto WY; Leonetti DL
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1992 May; 33(6):1888-93. PubMed ID: 1582794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Monoscopic versus stereoscopic retinal photography for grading diabetic retinopathy severity.
Li HK; Hubbard LD; Danis RP; Esquivel A; Florez-Arango JF; Krupinski EA
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2010 Jun; 51(6):3184-92. PubMed ID: 20053978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effectiveness and safety of screening for diabetic retinopathy with two nonmydriatic digital images compared with the seven standard stereoscopic photographic fields.
Boucher MC; Gresset JA; Angioi K; Olivier S
Can J Ophthalmol; 2003 Dec; 38(7):557-68. PubMed ID: 14740797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Study of the efficiency of a non-mydriatic retinal camera in the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy].
Hernáez-Ortega MC; Soto-Pedre E; Vázquez JA; Gutiérrez MA; Asua J
Rev Clin Esp; 1998 Apr; 198(4):194-9. PubMed ID: 9633202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A quantitative system to evaluate diabetic retinopathy from fundus photographs.
Feman SS; Leonard-Martin TC; Andrews JS; Armbruster CC; Burdge TL; Debelak JD; Lanier A; Fischer AG
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1995 Jan; 36(1):174-81. PubMed ID: 7822145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Grading of diabetic retinopathy from non-stereoscopic color fundus photographs--relationship to fluorescein angiography findings and three-year prognosis].
Kitano S
Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 2005 Sep; 109(9):563-72. PubMed ID: 16218434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Sensitivity and specificity of automated analysis of single-field non-mydriatic fundus photographs by Bosch DR Algorithm-Comparison with mydriatic fundus photography (ETDRS) for screening in undiagnosed diabetic retinopathy.
Bawankar P; Shanbhag N; K SS; Dhawan B; Palsule A; Kumar D; Chandel S; Sood S
PLoS One; 2017; 12(12):e0189854. PubMed ID: 29281690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Screening for diabetic retinopathy in rural area using single-field, digital fundus images.
Ruamviboonsuk P; Wongcumchang N; Surawongsin P; Panyawatananukul E; Tiensuwan M
J Med Assoc Thai; 2005 Feb; 88(2):176-80. PubMed ID: 15962667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Diabetic macular edema assessed with optical coherence tomography and stereo fundus photography.
Strøm C; Sander B; Larsen N; Larsen M; Lund-Andersen H
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Jan; 43(1):241-5. PubMed ID: 11773037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in Trang province determined by retinal photography and comprehensive eye examination.
Supapluksakul S; Ruamviboonsuk P; Chaowakul W
J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 May; 91(5):716-22. PubMed ID: 18672638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Can we predict which patients are at risk of having an ungradeable digital image for screening for diabetic retinopathy?
Murgatroyd H; Cox A; Ellingford A; Ellis JD; Macewen CJ; Leese GP
Eye (Lond); 2008 Mar; 22(3):344-8. PubMed ID: 17024219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
