These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9845030)

  • 1. Use of a loudness model for hearing-aid fitting. I. Linear hearing aids.
    Moore BC; Glasberg BR
    Br J Audiol; 1998 Oct; 32(5):317-35. PubMed ID: 9845030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Use of a loudness model for hearing aid fitting: III. A general method for deriving initial fittings for hearing aids with multi-channel compression.
    Moore BC; Glasberg BR; Stone MA
    Br J Audiol; 1999 Aug; 33(4):241-58. PubMed ID: 10509859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of a loudness model for hearing aid fitting: II. Hearing aids with multi-channel compression.
    Moore BC; Alcántara JI; Stone MA; Glasberg BR
    Br J Audiol; 1999 Jun; 33(3):157-70. PubMed ID: 10439142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of the NAL(R) and Cambridge formulae for the fitting of linear hearing aids.
    Peters RW; Moore BC; Glasberg BR; Stone MA
    Br J Audiol; 2000 Feb; 34(1):21-36. PubMed ID: 10759075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of threshold-based fitting strategies for nonlinear hearing aids.
    Stelmachowicz PG; Dalzell S; Peterson D; Kopun J; Lewis DL; Hoover BE
    Ear Hear; 1998 Apr; 19(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 9562535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of a loudness model for hearing aid fitting. IV. Fitting hearing aids with multi-channel compression so as to restore 'normal' loudness for speech at different levels.
    Moore BC
    Br J Audiol; 2000 Jun; 34(3):165-77. PubMed ID: 10905450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fitting hearing aids to individual loudness-perception measures.
    Ricketts TA
    Ear Hear; 1996 Apr; 17(2):124-32. PubMed ID: 8698159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is normal or less than normal overall loudness preferred by first-time hearing aid users?
    Smeds K
    Ear Hear; 2004 Apr; 25(2):159-72. PubMed ID: 15064661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparing loudness normalization (IHAFF) with speech intelligibility maximization (NAL-NL1) when implemented in a two-channel device.
    Keidser G; Grant F
    Ear Hear; 2001 Dec; 22(6):501-15. PubMed ID: 11770672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Maximizing effective audibility in hearing aid fitting.
    Ching TY; Dillon H; Katsch R; Byrne D
    Ear Hear; 2001 Jun; 22(3):212-24. PubMed ID: 11409857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of NAL and DSL prescriptive methods for paediatric hearing-aid fitting: predicted speech intelligibility and loudness.
    Ching TY; Johnson EE; Hou S; Dillon H; Zhang V; Burns L; van Buynder P; Wong A; Flynn C
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Dec; 52 Suppl 2(0 2):S29-38. PubMed ID: 24350692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. NAL-NL1 procedure for fitting nonlinear hearing aids: characteristics and comparisons with other procedures.
    Byrne D; Dillon H; Ching T; Katsch R; Keidser G
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2001 Jan; 12(1):37-51. PubMed ID: 11214977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Modern prescription theory and application: realistic expectations for speech recognition with hearing AIDS.
    Johnson EE
    Trends Amplif; 2013; 17(3):143-70. PubMed ID: 24253361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of low-pass filtering on the intelligibility of speech in quiet for people with and without dead regions at high frequencies.
    Vickers DA; Moore BC; Baer T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Aug; 110(2):1164-75. PubMed ID: 11519583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Threshold-based fitting methods for non-linear (WDRC) hearing instruments--comparison of acoustic characteristics.
    Smeds K; Leijon A
    Scand Audiol; 2001; 30(4):213-22. PubMed ID: 11845990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
    Davidson LS
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of a loudness model for hearing aid fitting. V. On-line gain control in a digital hearing aid.
    Launer S; Moore BC
    Int J Audiol; 2003 Jul; 42(5):262-73. PubMed ID: 12916699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the CAMEQ2-HF method for fitting hearing aids with multichannel amplitude compression.
    Moore BC; Füllgrabe C
    Ear Hear; 2010 Oct; 31(5):657-66. PubMed ID: 20526199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Children's speech perception and loudness ratings when fitted with hearing aids using the DSL v.4.1 and the NAL-NL1 prescriptions.
    Scollie SD; Ching TY; Seewald RC; Dillon H; Britton L; Steinberg J; King K
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Jan; 49 Suppl 1():S26-34. PubMed ID: 20109085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of two digital hearing instrument fitting strategies.
    Wesselkamp M; Margolf-Hackl S; Kiessling J
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 2001; (52):73-5. PubMed ID: 11318489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.