188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9846905)
1. Finite element analysis of non-axial versus axial loading of oral implants in the mandible of the dog.
Barbier L; Vander Sloten J; Krzesinski G; Schepers E; Van der Perre G
J Oral Rehabil; 1998 Nov; 25(11):847-58. PubMed ID: 9846905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Stimulating effect of implant loading on surrounding bone. Comparison of three numerical models and validation by in vivo data.
Mellal A; Wiskott HW; Botsis J; Scherrer SS; Belser UC
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Apr; 15(2):239-48. PubMed ID: 15008937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of stresses occurring on three different zirconia dental implants: three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Caglar A; Bal BT; Aydin C; Yilmaz H; Ozkan S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(1):95-103. PubMed ID: 20209191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative evaluation of the effect of diameter, length and number of implants supporting three-unit fixed partial prostheses on stress distribution in the bone.
Iplikçioğlu H; Akça K
J Dent; 2002 Jan; 30(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 11741734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Adaptive bone remodeling around oral implants under axial and nonaxial loading conditions in the dog mandible.
Barbier L; Schepers E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(2):215-23. PubMed ID: 9109272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Stress in bone adjacent to dental implants.
Murphy WM; Williams KR; Gregory MC
J Oral Rehabil; 1995 Dec; 22(12):897-903. PubMed ID: 9217301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of different fixture geometries on the stress distribution in mandibular peri-implant structures: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
Degerliyurt K; Simsek B; Erkmen E; Eser A
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Aug; 110(2):e1-11. PubMed ID: 20598590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Finite element analysis of effect of prosthesis height, angle of force application, and implant offset on supporting bone.
Sütpideler M; Eckert SE; Zobitz M; An KN
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(6):819-25. PubMed ID: 15623056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Finite element analysis of dental implant as orthodontic anchorage.
Sarmah A; Mathur AK; Gupta V; Pai VS; Nandini S
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2011 Jul; 12(4):259-64. PubMed ID: 22186860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Finite element analysis of 2 immediate loading systems in edentulous mandible: rigid and semirigid splinting of implants.
Teixeira MF; Ramalho SA; de Mattias Sartori IA; Lehmann RB
Implant Dent; 2010 Feb; 19(1):39-49. PubMed ID: 20147815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Implant-bone load transfer mechanisms in complete-arch prostheses supported by four implants: a three-dimensional finite element approach.
Baggi L; Pastore S; Di Girolamo M; Vairo G
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Jan; 109(1):9-21. PubMed ID: 23328192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the effect of the location and diameter of implants on the stress distribution in three-unit implant-supported posterior cantilever fixed partial dentures under dynamic loads].
Lü J; Liu C; Lan J; Gao X
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Dec; 31(6):552-6. PubMed ID: 24437284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of tapered and external hexagon connections on bone stresses around tilted dental implants: three-dimensional finite element method with statistical analysis.
de Faria Almeida DA; Pellizzer EP; Verri FR; Santiago JF; de Carvalho PS
J Periodontol; 2014 Feb; 85(2):261-9. PubMed ID: 23688104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Implant-bone interface stress distribution in immediately loaded implants of different diameters: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Ding X; Zhu XH; Liao SH; Zhang XH; Chen H
J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):393-402. PubMed ID: 19374710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The influence of occlusal loading location on stresses transferred to implant-supported prostheses and supporting bone: A three-dimensional finite element study.
Eskitascioglu G; Usumez A; Sevimay M; Soykan E; Unsal E
J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Feb; 91(2):144-50. PubMed ID: 14970760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of implant abutment type on stress distribution in bone under various loading conditions using finite element analysis.
Chun HJ; Shin HS; Han CH; Lee SH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(2):195-202. PubMed ID: 16634489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of different implant configurations for a mandibular fixed prosthesis.
Fazi G; Tellini S; Vangi D; Branchi R
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):752-9. PubMed ID: 21841984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Tooth-implant connection: some biomechanical aspects based on finite element analyses.
Menicucci G; Mossolov A; Mozzati M; Lorenzetti M; Preti G
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2002 Jun; 13(3):334-41. PubMed ID: 12010166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bone adaptation induced by non-passively fitting implant superstructures: a finite element analysis based on in vivo strain measurements.
Winter W; Taylor TD; Karl M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(6):1288-95. PubMed ID: 22167435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of stress and strain distribution characteristics of two different rigid implant designs for distal-extension fixed prostheses.
Akpinar I; Demirel F; Parnas L; Sahin S
Quintessence Int; 1996 Jan; 27(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 9063207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
