These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9846907)

  • 1. Influence of finishing time on marginal sealing ability of new generation composite bonding systems.
    Yap AU; Ang HQ; Chong KC
    J Oral Rehabil; 1998 Nov; 25(11):871-6. PubMed ID: 9846907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of marginal sealing ability of new generation bonding systems.
    Yap AU; Ho KS; Wong KM
    J Oral Rehabil; 1998 Sep; 25(9):666-71. PubMed ID: 9758395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of finishing time and techniques on marginal sealing ability of two composite restorative materials.
    Lopes GC; Franke M; Maia HP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jul; 88(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 12239477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Penetration of radiocalcium at the margins of resin and glass ionomer dentine bonding agents in primary and permanent teeth.
    Tulunoglu O; Tulunoglu I; Ulusu T; Genç Y
    J Dent; 2000 Sep; 28(7):481-6. PubMed ID: 10960751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The influence of finishing time on the marginal seal of a resin-modified glass-ionomer and polyacid-modified resin composite.
    Lim CC; Neo J; Yap A
    J Oral Rehabil; 1999 Jan; 26(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 10080324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Marginal quality and microleakage of adhesive class V restorations.
    Manhart J; Chen HY; Mehl A; Weber K; Hickel R
    J Dent; 2001 Feb; 29(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 11239587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Microleakage of light-cured resin and resin-modified glass-ionomer dentin bonding agents applied with co-cure vs pre-cure technique.
    Tulunoglu O; Uçtaşh M; Alaçam A; Omürlü H
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):292-8. PubMed ID: 11203833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of finishing/polishing techniques on microleakage of resin-modified glass ilonomer cement restorations.
    Yap AU; Yap WY; Yeo EJ; Tan JW; Ong DS
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 12540116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Laboratory evaluation of compomers in Class V restorations.
    Chersoni S; Lorenzi R; Ferrieri P; Prati C
    Am J Dent; 1997 Jun; 10(3):147-51. PubMed ID: 9545890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Marginal adaptation of resin-bonded light-cured glass ionomers in dentin cavities.
    Fritz UB; Finger WJ; Uno S
    Am J Dent; 1996 Dec; 9(6):253-8. PubMed ID: 9545879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dentin bond strength and marginal adaptation: direct composite resins vs ceramic inlays.
    Frankenberger R; Sindel J; Krämer N; Petschelt A
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):147-55. PubMed ID: 10530276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of different drying methods for single step adhesive systems on microleakage of tooth colored restorations.
    Owens BM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2003 Feb; 4(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 12595929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In vitro marginal adaptation of high-viscosity resin composite restorations bonded to dentin cavities.
    Rahiotis C; Tzoutzas J; Kakaboura A
    J Adhes Dent; 2004; 6(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 15119587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Microleakage of Class V resin-modified glass ionomer and compomer restorations.
    Toledano M; Osorio E; Osorio R; García-Godoy F
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 May; 81(5):610-5. PubMed ID: 10220667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of two different polishing techniques on microleakage of new composites in Class V restorations.
    Yalçin F; Korkmaz Y; Başeren M
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Nov; 7(5):18-25. PubMed ID: 17091136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of various surface protections on the margin microleakage of resin-modified glass ionomer cements.
    Chuang SF; Jin YT; Tsai PF; Wong TY
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Sep; 86(3):309-14. PubMed ID: 11552169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The marginal seal of Class II restorations: flowable composite resin compared to injectable glass ionomer.
    Payne JH
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1999; 23(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 10204453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Marginal leakage of filled dentin adhesives used with wet and dry bonding techniques.
    Santini A; Plasschaert AJ; Mitchell S
    Am J Dent; 2000 Apr; 13(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 11764834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of microleakage using different bonding agents.
    Gagliardi RM; Avelar RP
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(6):582-6. PubMed ID: 12413223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing microleakage in resin composite restorations rebonded with a surface sealant and three low-viscosity resin systems.
    Ramos RP; Chinelatti MA; Chimello DT; Dibb RG
    Quintessence Int; 2002 Jun; 33(6):450-6. PubMed ID: 12073726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.