These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

296 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9847553)

  • 1. The influence of semantic fit on on-line sentence processing.
    Schmauder AR; Egan MC
    Mem Cognit; 1998 Nov; 26(6):1304-12. PubMed ID: 9847553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Verb-specific constraints in sentence processing: separating effects of lexical preference from garden-paths.
    Trueswell JC; Tanenhaus MK; Kello C
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1993 May; 19(3):528-53. PubMed ID: 8501429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Limitations on the use of verb information during sentence comprehension.
    Kennison SM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2001 Mar; 8(1):132-8. PubMed ID: 11340858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interplay between syntax and semantics during sentence comprehension: ERP effects of combining syntactic and semantic violations.
    Hagoort P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Aug; 15(6):883-99. PubMed ID: 14511541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Plausibility and verb subeategorization in temporarily ambiguous sentences: evidence from self-paced reading.
    Traxler MJ
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2005 Jan; 34(1):1-30. PubMed ID: 15968918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The difficult mountain: enriched composition in adjective-noun phrases.
    Frisson S; Pickering MJ; McElree B
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2011 Dec; 18(6):1172-9. PubMed ID: 21826403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Utilization of prosodic information in syntactic ambiguity resolution.
    Dede G
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2010 Aug; 39(4):345-74. PubMed ID: 20033849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Misinterpretations in agreement and agreement attraction.
    Patson ND; Husband EM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(5):950-71. PubMed ID: 25624171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Processing temporary syntactic ambiguity: the effect of contextual bias.
    Mohamed MT; Clifton C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Sep; 64(9):1797-820. PubMed ID: 21722057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Proactive interference effects on sentence production.
    Ferreira VS; Firato CE
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2002 Dec; 9(4):795-800. PubMed ID: 12613685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. No Morphological Markers, No Problem: ERP Study Reveals Semantic Contribution to Distinct Neural Substrates Between Noun and Verb Processing in Online Sentence Comprehension.
    Feng J; Gong T; Shuai L; Wu Y
    Front Neurosci; 2019; 13():957. PubMed ID: 31551705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Semantic integration processes at different levels of syntactic hierarchy during sentence comprehension: an ERP study.
    Zhou X; Jiang X; Ye Z; Zhang Y; Lou K; Zhan W
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 May; 48(6):1551-62. PubMed ID: 20138898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Do verb bias effects on sentence production reflect sensitivity to comprehension or production factors?
    Ferreira VS; Schotter ER
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013 Aug; 66(8):1548-71. PubMed ID: 23286581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Argument status and PP-attachment.
    Boland JE; Blodgett A
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2006 Sep; 35(5):385-403. PubMed ID: 16838129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Neural basis of sentence processing in which incoming words form a sentence.
    Ikuta N; Sugiura M; Inoue K; Sato S; Horie K; Kawashima R
    Neuroreport; 2009 Mar; 20(5):531-5. PubMed ID: 19240659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Lexical access in the production of noun phrases.
    Schriefers H
    Cognition; 1992 Oct; 45(1):33-54. PubMed ID: 1424498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Thematic roles in sentence parsing.
    Clifton C
    Can J Exp Psychol; 1993 Jun; 47(2):222-46. PubMed ID: 8364531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comprehending anaphoric metaphors.
    Budiu R; Anderson JR
    Mem Cognit; 2002 Jan; 30(1):158-65. PubMed ID: 11958349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Broken agreement.
    Bock K; Miller CA
    Cogn Psychol; 1991 Jan; 23(1):45-93. PubMed ID: 2001615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Morphophonological influences on the comprehension of subject-verb agreement: an ERP study.
    Severens E; Jansma BM; Hartsuiker RJ
    Brain Res; 2008 Sep; 1228():135-44. PubMed ID: 18634765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.