These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9847612)

  • 41. MR cholangiopancreatography: comparison of images obtained with 1.0 and 1.5 Tesla units.
    Yasui M; Ito K; Koike S; Matsunaga N
    Radiat Med; 2002; 20(2):77-82. PubMed ID: 12041702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP): a perspective on potential clinical applications.
    Matos C; Devière J; Nicaise N; Braudé P; Van Gansbeke D; Metens T; Struyven J; Cremer M
    Acta Gastroenterol Belg; 1997; 60(4):268-73. PubMed ID: 9529670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Fat suppression techniques in MRI: an update.
    de Kerviler E; Leroy-Willig A; Clément O; Frija J
    Biomed Pharmacother; 1998; 52(2):69-75. PubMed ID: 9755798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. [Enhanced delineation of the pancreatic duct in MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) with a combined use of secretin].
    Takehara Y; Ichijo K; Tooyama N; Kodaira N; Fujiwara T; Yamamoto H; Watahiki H; Kaneko M
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1995 Mar; 55(4):255-6. PubMed ID: 7746728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. [Comparative studies of breath-hold magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) between different two sequences and between 1.0T and 1.5T units].
    Yasui M; Honjo K; Koike S; Matsunaga N
    Nihon Rinsho; 1998 Nov; 56(11):2849-53. PubMed ID: 9847608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Reconstruction of biliary structure in 2D MRCP images using multi-scale analysis.
    Logeswaran R
    Comput Biol Med; 2008 Mar; 38(3):391-400. PubMed ID: 18291357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Fat suppression with spectrally selective inversion vs. high spectral and spatial resolution MRI of breast lesions: qualitative and quantitative comparisons.
    Fan X; Abe H; Medved M; Foxley S; Arkani S; Zamora MA; Olopade OI; Newstead GM; Karczmar GS
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Dec; 24(6):1311-5. PubMed ID: 17096393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. MRCP pitfalls.
    Van Hoe L; Mermuys K; Vanhoenacker P
    Abdom Imaging; 2004; 29(3):360-87. PubMed ID: 15354345
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. MR pancreatography: technique and applications.
    Takehara Y
    Top Magn Reson Imaging; 1996 Oct; 8(5):290-301. PubMed ID: 8914227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [Fat suppression failure artifacts at the susceptibility interface on frequency selective fat suppression MR imaging in the head and neck].
    Anzai Y; Lufkin RB; Minoshima S; Ishihara M; Uno K; Yui N; Arimizu N
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1994 Jan; 54(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 8121765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [Elimination of artifacts in MRCP: technical consideration].
    Ohgi K; Satoh K; Tanaka S; Higami T; Furukawa T; Akiyama H; Kimura S; Uehara K; Murata K; Higashi M
    Nihon Rinsho; 1998 Nov; 56(11):2854-8. PubMed ID: 9847609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Fat and water magnetic resonance imaging.
    Bley TA; Wieben O; François CJ; Brittain JH; Reeder SB
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Jan; 31(1):4-18. PubMed ID: 20027567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. [Value of selective MIP reconstructions in respiratory triggered 3D TSE MR-cholangiography on a workstation in comparison with MIP standard projections and single-shot MRCP].
    Schaible R; Textor J; Kreft B; Neubrand M; Schild H
    Rofo; 2001 May; 173(5):416-23. PubMed ID: 11414149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, intraductal ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in bile duct strictures: a prospective comparison of imaging diagnostics with histopathological correlation.
    Domagk D; Wessling J; Reimer P; Hertel L; Poremba C; Senninger N; Heinecke A; Domschke W; Menzel J
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Sep; 99(9):1684-9. PubMed ID: 15330902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Pitfalls of MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP).
    Fulcher AS; Turner MA
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1998; 22(6):845-50. PubMed ID: 9843219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [Evaluation of a new sequence of magnetic resonance cholangio-pancreatography in thick cut and one shot acquisition].
    Mougenel JL; Hudziak H; Ernst O; Dupas B; Lefevre F; Barraud H; Watelet J; Cezard O; Regent D; Bigard MA
    Gastroenterol Clin Biol; 2000 Oct; 24(10):888-95. PubMed ID: 11084424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Breath-held MR cholangiopancreatography with half-averaged single shot hybrid rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement sequence: comparison of fast GRE and SE sequences.
    Ichikawa T; Nitatori T; Hachiya J; Mizutani Y
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1996; 20(5):798-802. PubMed ID: 8797916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. [Optimal scan parameters of MRCP using HASTE].
    Nishio H; Morimoto A; Shimoyashiki Y
    Nihon Rinsho; 1998 Nov; 56(11):2803-7. PubMed ID: 9847601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Diagnostic pitfalls of MR cholangiopancreatography in the evaluation of the biliary tract and gallbladder.
    Watanabe Y; Dohke M; Ishimori T; Amoh Y; Okumura A; Oda K; Koike S; Dodo Y
    Radiographics; 1999; 19(2):415-29. PubMed ID: 10194788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. MR cholangiopancreatography: techniques and clinical applications.
    Barish MA; Soto JA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Nov; 169(5):1295-303. PubMed ID: 9353445
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.