1074 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9847613)
1. [Evaluation of MRCP compared to ERCP in the diagnosis of biliary and pancreatic duct].
Hatano S; Kondoh S; Akiyama T; Okita K
Nihon Rinsho; 1998 Nov; 56(11):2874-9. PubMed ID: 9847613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, intraductal ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in bile duct strictures: a prospective comparison of imaging diagnostics with histopathological correlation.
Domagk D; Wessling J; Reimer P; Hertel L; Poremba C; Senninger N; Heinecke A; Domschke W; Menzel J
Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Sep; 99(9):1684-9. PubMed ID: 15330902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical significance of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) compared to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).
Hintze RE; Adler A; Veltzke W; Abou-Rebyeh H; Hammerstingl R; Vogl T; Felix R
Endoscopy; 1997 Mar; 29(3):182-7. PubMed ID: 9201467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. MR cholangiopancreatography of bile and pancreatic duct abnormalities with emphasis on the single-shot fast spin-echo technique.
Vitellas KM; Keogan MT; Spritzer CE; Nelson RC
Radiographics; 2000; 20(4):939-57; quiz 1107-8, 1112. PubMed ID: 10903685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Diagnostic value of secretin-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (S-MRCP) after unsuccessful endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)].
Czakó L; Takács T; Morvay Z; Csernay L; Lonovics J
Orv Hetil; 2004 Mar; 145(10):529-34. PubMed ID: 15085592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Half-Fourier RARE MR cholangiopancreatography: experience in 300 subjects.
Fulcher AS; Turner MA; Capps GW; Zfass AM; Baker KM
Radiology; 1998 Apr; 207(1):21-32. PubMed ID: 9530295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Magnetic resonance-cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of biliopancreatic diseases.
Lomanto D; Pavone P; Laghi A; Panebianco V; Mazzocchi P; Fiocca F; Lezoche E; Passariello R; Speranza V
Am J Surg; 1997 Jul; 174(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 9240949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pancreatic diseases: evaluation with MR cholangiopancreatography.
Ueno E; Takada Y; Yoshida I; Toda J; Sugiura T; Toki F
Pancreas; 1998 Apr; 16(3):418-26. PubMed ID: 9548689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. MRCP of congenital pancreaticobiliary malformation.
Kamisawa T; Tu Y; Egawa N; Tsuruta K; Okamoto A; Kamata N
Abdom Imaging; 2007; 32(1):129-33. PubMed ID: 16680507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [The usefulness of MRCP in the initial diagnosis of the biliary and pancreatic diseases compared with ERCP].
Iwano M; Mukai H; Mizuma Y; Takino T; Ashihara T; Ueda T; Matumura S; Fujita T; Takano Y; Fujiwara H; Watanabe A; Masuzawa A
Nihon Rinsho; 1998 Nov; 56(11):2880-4. PubMed ID: 9847614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [The utilities and outlooks of MR cholangiography (MRCP) as a non contrast and noninvasive technique].
Hachiya J; Haradome H
Nihon Rinsho; 1998 Nov; 56(11):2747-54. PubMed ID: 9847593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of endoscopic retrograde and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in the surgical diagnosis of pancreatic diseases.
Yamaguchi K; Chijiwa K; Shimizu S; Yokohata K; Morisaki T; Tanaka M
Am J Surg; 1998 Mar; 175(3):203-8. PubMed ID: 9560120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: comparative study with direct cholangiography].
Basile L; Pezzoto C; Roubicek D; Tempra A; Laborda Molteni J
Acta Gastroenterol Latinoam; 2000; 30(5):487-90. PubMed ID: 11144943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison between magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and ERCP for evaluation of the pancreatic duct.
Calvo MM; Bujanda L; Calderón A; Heras I; Cabriada JL; Bernal A; Orive V; Astigarraga E
Am J Gastroenterol; 2002 Feb; 97(2):347-53. PubMed ID: 11866272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. MR cholangiopancreatography using HASTE (half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin-echo) sequences.
Miyazaki T; Yamashita Y; Tsuchigame T; Yamamoto H; Urata J; Takahashi M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Jun; 166(6):1297-303. PubMed ID: 8633435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: non-invasive imaging for the biliary tree and pancreatic duct.
Little AF; Smith PJ; Hennessy OF; Lee WK
Med J Aust; 1998 Sep; 169(5):266-9. PubMed ID: 9762066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Single-shot MR cholangiopancreatography of neonates, infants, and young children.
Miyazaki T; Yamashita Y; Tang Y; Tsuchigame T; Takahashi M; Sera Y
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jan; 170(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 9423593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Value of MR cholangiography in the diagnosis of pancreatic diseases compared with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography].
Mitake M; Okamura S; Ohashi S; Urano F; Simodaira M; Kanamori S; Ohyama I; Okada N; Segawa K
Nihon Rinsho; 1998 Nov; 56(11):2885-9. PubMed ID: 9847615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Magnetic resonance study of the pancreatic duct.
Calvo MM; Calderón A; Heras I; Durán M; Orive V; Cabriada J; Astigarraga E
Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 1999 Apr; 91(4):287-96. PubMed ID: 10348928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: a novel approach to the evaluation of suspected pancreaticobiliary neoplasms.
Feldman DR; Kulling DP; Kay CL; Cole DJ; Cunningham JT; Hawes RH; Tarnasky PR; Cotton PB; Baron PL
Ann Surg Oncol; 1997 Dec; 4(8):634-8. PubMed ID: 9416410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
