456 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9847614)
1. [The usefulness of MRCP in the initial diagnosis of the biliary and pancreatic diseases compared with ERCP].
Iwano M; Mukai H; Mizuma Y; Takino T; Ashihara T; Ueda T; Matumura S; Fujita T; Takano Y; Fujiwara H; Watanabe A; Masuzawa A
Nihon Rinsho; 1998 Nov; 56(11):2880-4. PubMed ID: 9847614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, intraductal ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in bile duct strictures: a prospective comparison of imaging diagnostics with histopathological correlation.
Domagk D; Wessling J; Reimer P; Hertel L; Poremba C; Senninger N; Heinecke A; Domschke W; Menzel J
Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Sep; 99(9):1684-9. PubMed ID: 15330902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. MR cholangiopancreatography of bile and pancreatic duct abnormalities with emphasis on the single-shot fast spin-echo technique.
Vitellas KM; Keogan MT; Spritzer CE; Nelson RC
Radiographics; 2000; 20(4):939-57; quiz 1107-8, 1112. PubMed ID: 10903685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Magnetic resonance-cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of biliopancreatic diseases.
Lomanto D; Pavone P; Laghi A; Panebianco V; Mazzocchi P; Fiocca F; Lezoche E; Passariello R; Speranza V
Am J Surg; 1997 Jul; 174(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 9240949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [MR cholangiopancreatography: technique, indications and clinical results].
Pavone P; Laghi A; Panebianco V; Catalano C; Passariello R
Radiol Med; 1997 Dec; 94(6):632-41. PubMed ID: 9524602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Evaluation of MRCP compared to ERCP in the diagnosis of biliary and pancreatic duct].
Hatano S; Kondoh S; Akiyama T; Okita K
Nihon Rinsho; 1998 Nov; 56(11):2874-9. PubMed ID: 9847613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Application of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in biliary-pancreatic diseases.
Huang LY; Liu YX; Wu CR; Cui J; Zhang B
Chin Med J (Engl); 2009 Dec; 122(24):2967-72. PubMed ID: 20137483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
Shimizu S; Kutsumi H; Fujimoto S; Kawai K
Endoscopy; 1999 Jan; 31(1):74-9. PubMed ID: 10082413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pancreatic diseases: evaluation with MR cholangiopancreatography.
Ueno E; Takada Y; Yoshida I; Toda J; Sugiura T; Toki F
Pancreas; 1998 Apr; 16(3):418-26. PubMed ID: 9548689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Value of magnetic-resonance cholangio-pancreatography (MRCP) after unsuccessful endoscopic-retrograde cholangio-pancreatography (ERCP).
Adamek HE; Weitz M; Breer H; Jakobs R; Schilling D; Riemann JF
Endoscopy; 1997 Oct; 29(8):741-4. PubMed ID: 9427493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP): diagnostic usefulness].
Pamos S; Rivera P; Canelles P; Quiles F; Ortí E; Cuquerella J; Martínez V; Medina E
Gastroenterol Hepatol; 1998 Apr; 21(4):174-80. PubMed ID: 9633177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP).
Vrachliotis TG; Shirkhoda A; Bis KG; Shetty AN; Konez O; Ference JJ; Madrazo BL
Crit Rev Diagn Imaging; 1997 Aug; 38(4):295-323. PubMed ID: 9376087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Can endoscopic ultrasound or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography replace ERCP in patients with suspected biliary disease? A prospective trial and cost analysis.
Scheiman JM; Carlos RC; Barnett JL; Elta GH; Nostrant TT; Chey WD; Francis IR; Nandi PS
Am J Gastroenterol; 2001 Oct; 96(10):2900-4. PubMed ID: 11693324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The decision-making value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in patients seen in a referral center for suspected biliary and pancreatic disease.
Sahai AV; Devonshire D; Yeoh KG; Kay C; Feldman D; Willner I; Farber J; Patel R; Tamasky PR; Cunningham JT; Trus T; Hawes RH; Cotton PB
Am J Gastroenterol; 2001 Jul; 96(7):2074-80. PubMed ID: 11467634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Value of magnetic-resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) after unsuccessful endoscopic-retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).
Owens GR; Shutz SM
Gastrointest Endosc; 1999 Feb; 49(2):265-6. PubMed ID: 10084882
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [The value of magnetic resonance tomography (MRT), magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the diagnosis of pancreatic tumors].
Diehl SJ; Lehmann KJ; Gaa J; Meier-Willersen HJ; Wendl K; Georgi M
Rofo; 1999 May; 170(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 10370410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Diagnostic value of secretin-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (S-MRCP) after unsuccessful endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)].
Czakó L; Takács T; Morvay Z; Csernay L; Lonovics J
Orv Hetil; 2004 Mar; 145(10):529-34. PubMed ID: 15085592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: comparative study with direct cholangiography].
Basile L; Pezzoto C; Roubicek D; Tempra A; Laborda Molteni J
Acta Gastroenterol Latinoam; 2000; 30(5):487-90. PubMed ID: 11144943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Current status of MR cholangiopancreatography.
Reinhold C; Bret PM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Jun; 166(6):1285-95. PubMed ID: 8633434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) from a radiological and gastroenterological perspective].
Vogl TJ; Zeuzem S; Zangos S; Hammerstingl R
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2009 May; 134(19):1011-4. PubMed ID: 19401971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
