189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9848052)
1. Contrast limited adaptive histogram equalization image processing to improve the detection of simulated spiculations in dense mammograms.
Pisano ED; Zong S; Hemminger BM; DeLuca M; Johnston RE; Muller K; Braeuning MP; Pizer SM
J Digit Imaging; 1998 Nov; 11(4):193-200. PubMed ID: 9848052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Does intensity windowing improve the detection of simulated calcifications in dense mammograms?
Pisano ED; Chandramouli J; Hemminger BM; DeLuca M; Glueck D; Johnston RE; Muller K; Braeuning MP; Pizer S
J Digit Imaging; 1997 May; 10(2):79-84. PubMed ID: 9165422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Improving the detection of simulated masses in mammograms through two different image-processing techniques.
Hemminger BM; Zong S; Muller KE; Coffey CS; DeLuca MC; Johnston RE; Pisano ED
Acad Radiol; 2001 Sep; 8(9):845-55. PubMed ID: 11724039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of intensity windowing on the detection of simulated masses embedded in dense portions of digitized mammograms in a laboratory setting.
Pisano ED; Chandramouli J; Hemminger BM; Glueck D; Johnston RE; Muller K; Braeuning MP; Puff D; Garrett W; Pizer S
J Digit Imaging; 1997 Nov; 10(4):174-82. PubMed ID: 9399171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A digital equalisation technique improving visualisation of dense mammary gland and breast periphery in mammography.
Stefanoyiannis AP; Costaridou L; Skiadopoulos S; Panayiotakis G
Eur J Radiol; 2003 Feb; 45(2):139-49. PubMed ID: 12536094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of display luminance on the feature detection rates of masses in mammograms.
Hemminger BM; Dillon AW; Johnston RE; Muller KE; Deluca MC; Coffey CS; Pisano ED
Med Phys; 1999 Nov; 26(11):2266-72. PubMed ID: 10587207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparing the performance of mammographic enhancement algorithms: a preference study.
Sivaramakrishna R; Obuchowski NA; Chilcote WA; Cardenosa G; Powell KA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Jul; 175(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 10882244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Improvement of microcalcification cluster detection in mammography utilizing image enhancement techniques.
Papadopoulos A; Fotiadis DI; Costaridou L
Comput Biol Med; 2008 Oct; 38(10):1045-55. PubMed ID: 18774128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A psychophysical comparison of two methods for adaptive histogram equalization.
Zimmerman JB; Cousins SB; Hartzell KM; Frisse ME; Kahn MG
J Digit Imaging; 1989 May; 2(2):82-91. PubMed ID: 2488161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of histogram equalization and contrast limited adaptive histogram equalization effect on image quality and fractal dimensions of digital periapical radiographs.
Mehdizadeh M; Tavakoli Tafti K; Soltani P
Oral Radiol; 2023 Apr; 39(2):418-424. PubMed ID: 36076131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of breast masses using digitized images versus screen-film mammography.
Liang Z; Du X; Liu J; Yao X; Yang Y; Li K
Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):618-22. PubMed ID: 18568552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Radiologists' preferences for digital mammographic display. The International Digital Mammography Development Group.
Pisano ED; Cole EB; Major S; Zong S; Hemminger BM; Muller KE; Johnston RE; Walsh R; Conant E; Fajardo LL; Feig SA; Nishikawa RM; Yaffe MJ; Williams MB; Aylward SR
Radiology; 2000 Sep; 216(3):820-30. PubMed ID: 10966717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A segmentation technique to detect masses in dense breast digitized mammograms.
Santos VT; Schiabel H; Góes CE; Benatti RH
J Digit Imaging; 2002; 15 Suppl 1():210-3. PubMed ID: 12105730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Utility of adaptive control processing for the interpretation of digital mammograms.
Jinnouchi M; Yabuuchi H; Kubo M; Tokunaga E; Yamamoto H; Honda H
Acta Radiol; 2016 Nov; 57(11):1297-1303. PubMed ID: 25995309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Detection of simulated microcalcifications in fixed mammary tissue: An ROC study of the effect of local versus global histogram equalization.
Sund T; Olsen JB
Acta Radiol; 2006 Sep; 47(7):650-4. PubMed ID: 16950699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A method to test the reproducibility and to improve performance of computer-aided detection schemes for digitized mammograms.
Zheng B; Gur D; Good WF; Hardesty LA
Med Phys; 2004 Nov; 31(11):2964-72. PubMed ID: 15587648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic accuracy of digital mammography in patients with dense breasts who underwent problem-solving mammography: effects of image processing and lesion type.
Cole EB; Pisano ED; Kistner EO; Muller KE; Brown ME; Feig SA; Jong RA; Maidment AD; Staiger MJ; Kuzmiak CM; Freimanis RI; Lesko N; Rosen EL; Walsh R; Williford M; Braeuning MP
Radiology; 2003 Jan; 226(1):153-60. PubMed ID: 12511684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparing the performance of image enhancement methods to detect microcalcification clusters in digital mammography.
Moradmand H; Setayeshi S; Karimian AR; Sirous M; Akbari ME
Iran J Cancer Prev; 2012; 5(2):61-8. PubMed ID: 25628822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of enhancement methods for mammograms with performance measures.
Kurt B; Nabiyev VV; Turhan K
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2014; 205():486-90. PubMed ID: 25160232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Enhancement of Mammographic Images Using Histogram-Based Techniques for Their Classification Using CNN.
Alshamrani K; Alshamrani HA; Alqahtani FF; Almutairi BS
Sensors (Basel); 2022 Dec; 23(1):. PubMed ID: 36616832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
