These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9849364)

  • 21. Patient satisfaction with aesthetic outcome after bilateral prophylactic mastectomy and immediate reconstruction with implants.
    Gahm J; Jurell G; Edsander-Nord A; Wickman M
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2010 Feb; 63(2):332-8. PubMed ID: 19071075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Aesthetic refinements and reoperative procedures following 370 consecutive DIEP and SIEA flap breast reconstructions: important considerations for patient consent.
    Enajat M; Smit JM; Rozen WM; Hartman EH; Liss A; Kildal M; Audolfsson T; Acosta R
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2010 Jun; 34(3):306-12. PubMed ID: 20424838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Vertical reduction mammaplasty utilizing the superomedial pedicle: is it really for everyone?
    Neaman KC; Armstrong SD; Mendonca SJ; Aitken MA; VanderWoude DL; Renucci JD; Alfonso DR
    Aesthet Surg J; 2012 Aug; 32(6):718-25. PubMed ID: 22859543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Different techniques of reduction mammaplasty comparing clinical and esthetic complications with patient satisfaction].
    Stranz G; Petri E
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1999; 121(9):434-40. PubMed ID: 10522376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A process for quantifying aesthetic and functional breast surgery: I. Quantifying optimal nipple position and vertical and horizontal skin excess for mastopexy and breast reduction.
    Jia Y; Wang X
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2014 Mar; 133(3):421e-422e. PubMed ID: 24572890
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Satisfaction with outcome and attitudes towards scarring among women undergoing breast reconstructive surgery.
    Abu-Nab Z; Grunfeld EA
    Patient Educ Couns; 2007 May; 66(2):243-9. PubMed ID: 17337153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Aesthetic breast shape preferences among plastic surgeons.
    Broer PN; Juran S; Walker ME; Ng R; Weichman K; Tanna N; Liu YJ; Shah A; Patel A; Persing JA; Thomson JG
    Ann Plast Surg; 2015 Jun; 74(6):639-44. PubMed ID: 24691316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Self-esteem and patients' satisfaction after deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction.
    Haekens CM; Enajat M; Keymeulen K; Van der Hulst RR
    Plast Surg Nurs; 2011; 31(4):160-6. PubMed ID: 22157606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Reply: A process for quantifying aesthetic and functional breast surgery: I. Quantifying optimal nipple position and vertical and horizontal skin excess for mastopexy and breast reduction.
    Tebbetts J
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2014 Mar; 133(3):422e-423e. PubMed ID: 24572891
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The aesthetic implication of scar position in breast reconstruction.
    Coutinho M; Southern S; Ramakrishnan V; Watt D; Fourie L; Sharpe DT
    Br J Plast Surg; 2001 Jun; 54(4):326-30. PubMed ID: 11355988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. No-vertical-scar technique versus inverted T-scar technique in reduction mammoplasty: a two-center comparative study.
    Hosnuter M; Tosun Z; Kargi E; Babuccu O; Savaci N
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2005; 29(6):496-502. PubMed ID: 16328641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A comparison of the LeJour and Wise pattern methods of breast reduction.
    Kreithen J; Caffee H; Rosenberg J; Chin G; Clayman M; Lawson M; Seagle MB
    Ann Plast Surg; 2005 Mar; 54(3):236-41; discussion 241-2. PubMed ID: 15725821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Objective evaluation of nipple position after 336 breast reductions.
    Lewin R; Widmark-Jensen E; Plate N; Hansson E
    J Plast Surg Hand Surg; 2018 Aug; 52(4):198-203. PubMed ID: 29291680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Measuring patient-based outcomes in a plastic surgery service: breast reduction surgical patients.
    Shakespeare V; Cole RP
    Br J Plast Surg; 1997 Jun; 50(4):242-8. PubMed ID: 9215080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Outcome of reduction mammaplasty--a patients' perspective.
    Brown AP; Hill C; Khan K
    Br J Plast Surg; 2000 Oct; 53(7):584-7. PubMed ID: 11000075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Systematic Review: Aesthetic Assessment of Breast Reconstruction Outcomes by Healthcare Professionals.
    Maass SW; Bagher S; Hofer SO; Baxter NN; Zhong T
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Dec; 22(13):4305-16. PubMed ID: 25691279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Aesthetic outcome and oncological safety of nipple-areola complex replantation after mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction.
    Wirth R; Banic A; Erni D
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2010 Sep; 63(9):1490-4. PubMed ID: 19805012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparative Outcomes and Quality Analysis of Inverted-T and Pure Vertical Scar Techniques in Superomedial Pedicle Reduction Mammaplasty.
    Fernandez S; Coady L; Cohen-Shohet R; Molas-Pierson J; Mast BA
    Ann Plast Surg; 2016 Jun; 76 Suppl 4():S328-31. PubMed ID: 27015329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Vertical scar breast reduction with medial flap or glandular transposition of the nipple-areola.
    Asplund OA; Davies DM
    Br J Plast Surg; 1996 Dec; 49(8):507-14. PubMed ID: 8976741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Clinical outcome, quality of life, patients' satisfaction, and aesthetic results, after reduction mammaplasty.
    Eggert E; Schuss R; Edsander-Nord A
    Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg; 2009; 43(4):201-6. PubMed ID: 19688643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.