These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9849544)

  • 1. Assessment of bibliographic databases performance in information retrieval for occupational and environmental toxicology.
    Gehanno JF; Paris C; Thirion B; Caillard JF
    Occup Environ Med; 1998 Aug; 55(8):562-6. PubMed ID: 9849544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of the performance of seven key bibliographic databases in identifying all relevant systematic reviews of interventions for hypertension.
    Rathbone J; Carter M; Hoffmann T; Glasziou P
    Syst Rev; 2016 Feb; 5():27. PubMed ID: 26862061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Searching for information on toxicological data of chemical substances in selected bibliographic databases--selection of essential databases for toxicological researches.
    Ludl H; Schöpe LH; Mangelsdorf I
    Chemosphere; 1996 Mar; 32(5):867-80. PubMed ID: 8867141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of drug interaction document citation in nine on-line bibliographic databases.
    Barillot MJ; Sarrut B; Doreau CG
    Ann Pharmacother; 1997 Jan; 31(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 8997464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. EMBASE versus MEDLINE for family medicine searches: can MEDLINE searches find the forest or a tree?
    Wilkins T; Gillies RA; Davies K
    Can Fam Physician; 2005 Jun; 51(6):848-9. PubMed ID: 16926954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparing the coverage, recall, and precision of searches for 120 systematic reviews in Embase, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar: a prospective study.
    Bramer WM; Giustini D; Kramer BM
    Syst Rev; 2016 Mar; 5():39. PubMed ID: 26932789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Searching fee and non-fee toxicology information resources: an overview of selected databases.
    Wright LL
    Toxicology; 2001 Jan; 157(1-2):89-110. PubMed ID: 11164977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison and evaluation of nine bibliographic databases concerning adverse drug reactions.
    Biarez O; Sarrut B; Doreau CG; Etienne J
    DICP; 1991 Oct; 25(10):1062-5. PubMed ID: 1803790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Performance of online biomedical databases in rheumatology.
    Ramos-Remus C; Suarez-Almazor M; Dorgan M; Gomez-Vargas A; Russell AS
    J Rheumatol; 1994 Oct; 21(10):1912-21. PubMed ID: 7837159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Full-text and bibliographic database searching in the health sciences: an exploratory study comparing CCML and MEDLINE.
    Gallagher KE; Hulbert LA; Sullivan CP
    Med Ref Serv Q; 1990; 9(4):17-25. PubMed ID: 10110455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Identifying clinical trials in the medical literature with electronic databases: MEDLINE alone is not enough.
    Suarez-Almazor ME; Belseck E; Homik J; Dorgan M; Ramos-Remus C
    Control Clin Trials; 2000 Oct; 21(5):476-87. PubMed ID: 11018564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. High-performance information search filters for CKD content in PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, and EMBASE.
    Iansavichus AV; Hildebrand AM; Haynes RB; Wilczynski NL; Levin A; Hemmelgarn BR; Tu K; Nesrallah GE; Nash DM; Garg AX
    Am J Kidney Dis; 2015 Jan; 65(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 25059221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of literature searches on quality and costs for health technology assessment using the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases.
    Topfer LA; Parada A; Menon D; Noorani H; Perras C; Serra-Prat M
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1999; 15(2):297-303. PubMed ID: 10507189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Information sources for obesity prevention policy research: a review of systematic reviews.
    Hanneke R; Young SK
    Syst Rev; 2017 Aug; 6(1):156. PubMed ID: 28789703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Crossover comparison of drug information online database vendors: Dialog and MEDLARS.
    Rovers JP; Janosik JE; Souney PF
    Ann Pharmacother; 1993 May; 27(5):634-9. PubMed ID: 8347917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane index most primary studies but not abstracts included in orthopedic meta-analyses.
    Slobogean GP; Verma A; Giustini D; Slobogean BL; Mulpuri K
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Dec; 62(12):1261-7. PubMed ID: 19364634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lessons for search strategies from a systematic review, in The Cochrane Library, of nutritional supplementation trials in patients after hip fracture.
    Avenell A; Handoll HH; Grant AM
    Am J Clin Nutr; 2001 Mar; 73(3):505-10. PubMed ID: 11237924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Selecting a database for literature searches in nursing: MEDLINE or CINAHL?
    Brazier H; Begley CM
    J Adv Nurs; 1996 Oct; 24(4):868-75. PubMed ID: 8894905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Searching for evidence-based data].
    Dufour JC; Mancini J; Fieschi M
    J Chir (Paris); 2009 Aug; 146(4):355-67. PubMed ID: 19775689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Spanish personal name variations in national and international biomedical databases: implications for information retrieval and bibliometric studies.
    Ruiz-Pérez R; Delgado López-Cózar E; Jiménez-Contreras E
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2002 Oct; 90(4):411-30. PubMed ID: 12398248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.