66 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9849594)
1. [Dosage monitoring as a quality control instrument in digital radiography].
Kurtz C; Czapp W; Klose KJ
Rofo; 1998 Nov; 169(5):465-70. PubMed ID: 9849594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An examination of automatic exposure control regimes for two digital radiography systems.
Marshall NW
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug; 54(15):4645-70. PubMed ID: 19590115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Patient dosimetry and image quality in digital radiology from online audit of the X-ray system.
Vano E; Fernandez JM; Ten JI; Gonzalez L; Guibelalde E; Prieto C
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):199-203. PubMed ID: 16461529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dual-energy cardiac imaging: an image quality and dose comparison for a flat-panel detector and x-ray image intensifier.
Ducote JL; Xu T; Molloi S
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jan; 52(1):183-96. PubMed ID: 17183135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. 3-Dimensional rotational X-ray imaging, 3D-RX: image quality and patient dose simulation for optimisation studies.
Kroon JN
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):341-9. PubMed ID: 15933134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Digital storage phosphor radiography. Doses and image quality].
Salvini E; Pedroli G; Montanari G; Pastori R; Crespi A; Zincone G
Radiol Med; 1994 Jun; 87(6):847-51. PubMed ID: 8041940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Performance evaluation and testing of digital intra-oral radiographic systems.
Doyle P; Finney L
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):313-7. PubMed ID: 16461488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Calibrating automatic exposure control devices for digital radiography.
Doyle P; Martin CJ
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Nov; 51(21):5475-85. PubMed ID: 17047264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Radiation exposure of children in pediatric radiology. Part 4: Entrance doses achieved during the X-ray examination of the chest].
Seidenbusch MC; Schneider K
Rofo; 2008 Dec; 180(12):1082-103. PubMed ID: 19009497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quality assurance (QA) procedures for software: evaluation of an ADC quality system.
Efstathopoulos EP; Benekos O; Molfetas M; Charou E; Kottou S; Argentos S; Kelekis NL
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):291-7. PubMed ID: 16464840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of dose metrics and radiation risk models when optimizing CT x-ray tube voltage.
Huda W; Ogden KM; Khorasani MR
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 53(17):4719-32. PubMed ID: 18695298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Radiation exposure in full-field digital mammography with a flat-panel x-ray detector based on amorphous silicon in comparison with conventional screen-film mammography].
Hermann KP; Obenauer S; Grabbe E
Rofo; 2000 Nov; 172(11):940-5. PubMed ID: 11142129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Technical advances of interventional fluoroscopy and flat panel image receptor.
Lin PJ
Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):650-7. PubMed ID: 18849699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of grid control and object detection on radiation exposure and image quality using mobile C-arms - first results.
Gosch D; Ratzmer A; Berauer P; Kahn T
Rofo; 2007 Sep; 179(9):896-900. PubMed ID: 17705113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dose and perceived image quality in chest radiography.
Veldkamp WJ; Kroft LJ; Geleijns J
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Nov; 72(2):209-17. PubMed ID: 19577393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Chest radiography: a comparison of image quality and effective dose using four digital systems.
Pascoal A; Lawinski CP; Mackenzie A; Tabakov S; Lewis CA
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):273-7. PubMed ID: 15933121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of the problem: pediatric doses in screen-film and digital radiography.
Huda W
Pediatr Radiol; 2004 Oct; 34 Suppl 3():S173-82; discussion S234-41. PubMed ID: 15558259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effective dose and image quality evaluations of an automatic CT tube current modulation system with an anthropomorphic phantom.
Rampado O; Marchisio F; Izzo A; Garelli E; Bianchi CC; Gandini G; Ropolo R
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Oct; 72(1):181-7. PubMed ID: 18692337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Digital radiography: image quality and radiation dose.
Seibert JA
Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):586-98. PubMed ID: 18849693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Initial clinical results with a new needle screen storage phosphor system in chest radiograms.
Körner M; Wirth S; Treitl M; Reiser M; Pfeifer KJ
Rofo; 2005 Nov; 177(11):1491-6. PubMed ID: 16302129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
